Suppr超能文献

中西部一大型公立大学医学生的同理心水平——一项横断面研究。

Empathy levels among health professional students at a large midwestern public university - a cross-sectional study.

机构信息

The University of Iowa College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.

The University of Iowa College of Pharmacy, Iowa City, IA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2023 Feb 20;23(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04090-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Empathic care is considered extremely important by patients and providers alike but there is still an ample need for assessing empathy among healthcare students and professionals and identifying appropriate educational interventions to improve it. This study aims to assess empathy levels and associated factors among students at different healthcare colleges at the University of Iowa.

METHODS

An online survey was delivered to healthcare students, including nursing, pharmacy, dental, and medical colleges (IRB ID #202,003,636). The cross-sectional survey included background questions, probing questions, college-specific questions, and the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Health Professionals Student version (JSPE-HPS). To examine bivariate associations, Kruskal Wallis and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used. A linear model with no transformation was used in the multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

Three hundred students responded to the survey. Overall JSPE-HPS score was 116 (± 11.7), consistent with other healthcare professional samples. There was no significant difference in JSPE-HPS score among the different colleges (P = 0.532).

CONCLUSION

Controlling for other variables in the linear model, healthcare students' view of their faculty's empathy toward patients and students' self-reported empathy levels were significantly associated with students' JSPE-HPS scores.

摘要

背景

共情关怀被患者和医护人员都认为是极其重要的,但仍需要评估医学生和专业人员的同理心,并确定适当的教育干预措施来提高同理心。本研究旨在评估爱荷华大学不同医疗学院学生的同理心水平和相关因素。

方法

向包括护理、药学、牙科和医学院在内的医学生在线发放调查问卷(IRB ID #202,003,636)。横断面调查包括背景问题、探究问题、学院特定问题和 Jefferson 同理心量表-健康专业人员学生版(JSPE-HPS)。为了检验变量间的关联,使用 Kruskal Wallis 和 Wilcoxon 秩和检验。多变量分析中使用未经转换的线性模型。

结果

共有 300 名学生对调查做出了回应。总体而言,JSPE-HPS 得分为 116(±11.7),与其他医疗专业样本一致。不同学院之间的 JSPE-HPS 得分没有显著差异(P=0.532)。

结论

在校正线性模型中的其他变量后,医学生对其教师对患者的同理心的看法以及学生自我报告的同理心水平与学生的 JSPE-HPS 得分显著相关。

相似文献

2
Empathy level towards patients among thai dental students: a cross-sectional study.
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Mar 30;23(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02891-6.
3
Measuring empathy in pharmacy students.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Aug 10;75(6):109. doi: 10.5688/ajpe756109.
4
Empathy in occupational therapy students: a cross-sectional study at a Spanish university.
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 26;12(4):e058821. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058821.
6
Empathy in health professional students: A comparative cross-sectional study.
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Jun;41:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.022. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
8
Measuring empathic behaviour among undergraduate dietetics students.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2024 Mar;30(2):153-161. doi: 10.1111/jep.13913. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
10
The Educational Effects of a Pregnancy Simulation in Medical/Nursing Students and Professionals.
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 24;19(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1589-8.

引用本文的文献

2
Use of an age-simulation suit as an empathy-building method for dental students: a pre-post study.
PeerJ. 2024 Aug 21;12:e17908. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17908. eCollection 2024.
3
Impact of Multimodal Intervention on Empathy Levels in Medical Students: A Questionnaire-Based Study.
Cureus. 2024 Apr 27;16(4):e59169. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59169. eCollection 2024 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of psychometric assessment of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Aug;26(4):1302-1315. doi: 10.1111/jep.13293. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
4
Empathy Levels of Dental Faculty and Students: A Survey Study at an Academic Dental Institution in Chile.
J Dent Educ. 2019 Oct;83(10):1134-1141. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.124. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
5
Empathy in dental care - the role of vicarious trauma.
Int Dent J. 2019 Oct;69(5):348-353. doi: 10.1111/idj.12487. Epub 2019 May 17.
7
Improving Empathy in Nursing Students: A Comparative Longitudinal Study of Two Curricula.
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2018 Oct;48(5):497-505. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2018.48.5.497.
8
Eliciting the Patient's Agenda- Secondary Analysis of Recorded Clinical Encounters.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jan;34(1):36-40. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4540-5. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
10
Physicians' self-assessed empathy levels do not correlate with patients' assessments.
PLoS One. 2018 May 31;13(5):e0198488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198488. eCollection 2018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验