Gregory Soma, Caffrey Louise, Daly Deirdre
School of Social Work and Social Policy, Trinity College Dublin, 24 D'Olier Street, Dublin D02 T283, Ireland.
School of Social Work and Social Policy, Trinity College Dublin, 24 D'Olier Street, Dublin D02 T283, Ireland.
Women Birth. 2023 Jul;36(4):e445-e452. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.02.003. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
Internationally, little is known about the experiences of the minority who have birthed both in hospital and at home. This group are in a unique position to provide experiential evidence regarding perceptions of care under each approach.
Obstetric care within the hospital setting is the hegemonic approach to birth in western cultures. Homebirth is at least as safe as hospital birth for those with low-risk pregnancies, yet access is strictly regulated.
To explore how those who have experienced both hospital and homebirth maternity care in Ireland perceived the care received, and experienced birth in each setting.
141 participants who birthed both in hospital and at home between 2011 and 2021 completed an online survey.
Participants' overall experience scores were significantly higher for homebirth (9.7/10) than hospital birth (5.5/10). In hospital, midwifery-led care scored significantly higher (6.4/10) than consultant-led care (4.9/10). Qualitative data revealed four explanatory themes: 1) Regulation of birth; 2) Continuity of care and/or carer and establishing relationships; 3) Bodily integrity and informed consent; and 4) Lived experiences of labour and birth at home and in hospital.
Homebirth was perceived far more positively than hospital birth experiences across all aspects of care surveyed. Findings suggest that those who have experienced both models of care have unique perspectives and aspirations about childbirth.
This study provides evidence regarding the need for genuine choices for maternity care and reveals the importance of care which is respectful and responsive to divergent ideologies about birth.
在国际上,对于那些既在医院又在家里分娩的少数人群的经历知之甚少。这群人处于独特的位置,可以提供关于在每种方法下的护理感知的经验证据。
在西方文化中,医院环境中的产科护理是生育的主导方式。对于低风险妊娠的人来说,家庭分娩至少与医院分娩一样安全,但获得家庭分娩的机会受到严格限制。
探讨那些在爱尔兰既在医院又在家庭中经历过母婴保健的人如何看待他们在每个环境中接受的护理,并体验分娩。
2011 年至 2021 年间,141 名在医院和家中分娩过的参与者完成了一项在线调查。
参与者对家庭分娩(9.7/10)的整体体验评分明显高于医院分娩(5.5/10)。在医院,助产士主导的护理评分(6.4/10)明显高于顾问主导的护理(4.9/10)。定性数据揭示了四个解释性主题:1)分娩的监管;2)护理和/或照顾者的连续性以及建立关系;3)身体完整性和知情同意;4)在家中和医院分娩的劳动和分娩的亲身体验。
家庭分娩在所有调查的护理方面都被认为比医院分娩体验更积极。研究结果表明,那些经历过两种护理模式的人对分娩有独特的观点和期望。
本研究提供了关于产妇保健真正选择的证据,并揭示了尊重和回应关于分娩的不同理念的护理的重要性。