Suppr超能文献

瑞典脓毒症前后的医疗保健利用情况:一项病例对照研究。

Use of healthcare before and after sepsis in Sweden: a case-control study.

机构信息

Division of Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Division of Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 17;13(2):e065967. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065967.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare readmissions and death between sepsis and non-sepsis hospitalisations the first year after discharge, and to investigate what diagnoses patients with sepsis present with at readmission. The aim was also to evaluate to what degree patients hospitalised for sepsis seek medical attention prior to hospitalisation.

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study with data validated through clinical chart review. A disproportionate stratified sampling model was used to include a relatively larger number of sepsis hospitalisations.

SETTING

All eight public hospitals in region Scania, Sweden (1 January to 3 December 2019).

PARTICIPANTS

There were 447 patients hospitalised for sepsis (cases), and 541 hospitalised for other causes (control) identified through clinical chart review.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Cox regression was used to analyse readmission and death the year after discharge, and logistic regression was used to analyse healthcare the week prior to hospitalisation. Both analyses were made unadjusted, and adjusted for age, sex and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Out of patients who survived a sepsis hospitalisation, 48% were readmitted the year after discharge, compared with 39% for patients without sepsis (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.19), p=0.04. The majority (52%) of readmissions occurred within 90 days and 75% within 180 days. The readmissions were most often caused by infection (32%), and 18% by cardiovascular disease. Finally, 34% of patients with sepsis had sought prehospital contact with a physician the week before hospitalisation, compared with 22% for patients without sepsis (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.06 to 3.04), p=0.03.

CONCLUSION

Patients hospitalised for sepsis had a higher risk of readmission the year after discharge compared with patients without sepsis. The most common diagnoses at readmission were infection followed by cardiovascular disease. With better follow-up, some of these readmissions could potentially be prevented. Patients hospitalised for sepsis had sought prehospital contact the week prior to hospitalisation to a greater extent than patients without sepsis.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较脓毒症患者和非脓毒症患者出院后第一年的再入院率和死亡率,并探讨脓毒症患者再入院时的诊断情况。本研究还旨在评估因脓毒症住院的患者在住院前寻求医疗救治的程度。

设计

回顾性病例对照研究,数据通过临床病历回顾进行验证。采用不均衡分层抽样模型以纳入更多的脓毒症住院患者。

地点

瑞典斯科讷省的 8 家公立医院(2019 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 3 日)。

参与者

通过临床病历回顾共确定了 447 例因脓毒症住院的患者(病例)和 541 例因其他原因住院的患者(对照)。

结局指标

使用 Cox 回归分析出院后一年的再入院率和死亡率,使用逻辑回归分析住院前一周的医疗情况。这两种分析均未调整,调整了年龄、性别和合并症。

结果

存活的脓毒症患者中有 48%在出院后一年再次入院,而非脓毒症患者的再入院率为 39%(HR 1.50,95%CI 1.03 至 2.19),p=0.04。大多数(52%)再入院发生在 90 天内,75%发生在 180 天内。再入院的主要原因是感染(32%),其次是心血管疾病(18%)。最后,34%的脓毒症患者在住院前一周曾与医生进行过接触,而非脓毒症患者的这一比例为 22%(OR 1.80,95%CI 1.06 至 3.04),p=0.03。

结论

与非脓毒症患者相比,因脓毒症住院的患者出院后一年内再入院的风险更高。再入院的主要诊断是感染,其次是心血管疾病。通过更好的随访,这些再入院中的一部分是可以预防的。因脓毒症住院的患者在住院前一周比非脓毒症患者更倾向于寻求医疗救治。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ca5/9944643/e8f0c7f5ad4d/bmjopen-2022-065967f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验