• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自行车道对骑车人友好吗?改善混合交通中骑行感知安全的微观环境因素。

Are bicycle streets cyclist-friendly? Micro-environmental factors for improving perceived safety when cycling in mixed traffic.

机构信息

Department of Economy and Society, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Earth Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

Department of Economy and Society, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2023 May;184:107007. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107007. Epub 2023 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2023.107007
PMID:36806076
Abstract

A bicycle street is a mixed traffic street where motor vehicles are forced to adapt their speed to bicycle traffic, for example by encouraging cycling in the middle of the street using centered bicycle lanes. The objective safety of cyclists increases with lower vehicle speeds and fewer motor vehicles. Despite this, cyclists' perception of their safety is often reduced in mixed traffic streets. Subjective unsafety and risk constitute a major barrier to increased cycling. This study investigates how the design of the micro-environment of bicycle streets can improve cyclists' perceived safety in mixed traffic. A quasi-experimental survey in which 371 participants rated their perceived safety in photo-manipulated bicycle streets was conducted. 52% of the participants were male, the mean age was 43 (20-77) years, and 76% reported that they cycle 4-5 days a week or more. The focus was on evaluating micro-environmental factors such as different designs of centered bicycle lanes, road markings, signs, traffic volume, and parked cars. It is concluded that the micro-environment has important effects on the perceived safety of cyclists. Important gains in subjective safety can be achieved with fairly simple design efforts. Many participants felt safe when there were clearly demarcated red-colored bicycle lanes in the center of the street accompanied by road markings for cyclists. The strongest effect, however, comes from reducing traffic volume. Most participants felt safe in micro-environments in which the traffic volume had been reduced, including those where no design changes had been made. Important differences between different groups of cyclists were also found.

摘要

自行车道是一种混合交通道路,机动车辆被迫在这种道路上降低速度以适应自行车交通,例如通过在道路中间使用中心式自行车道来鼓励骑车。随着车辆速度降低和机动车数量减少,自行车骑行者的安全性客观上会提高。尽管如此,在混合交通道路上,自行车骑行者对自身安全的感知往往会降低。主观上的不安全和风险是增加骑行的主要障碍。本研究旨在探讨自行车道微观环境的设计如何能提高混合交通中自行车骑行者的感知安全性。研究采用准实验调查方法,让 371 名参与者对经过照片处理的自行车道的感知安全性进行评分。参与者中 52%为男性,平均年龄为 43 岁(20-77 岁),76%的参与者报告每周骑车 4-5 天或以上。研究重点评估了微观环境因素,如中心式自行车道的不同设计、道路标线、标志、交通量和停放的汽车。研究结果表明,微观环境对自行车骑行者的感知安全性有重要影响。通过相当简单的设计努力,可以显著提高主观安全性。当街道中间有明确划分的红色自行车道,并配有自行车道标线时,许多参与者会感到安全。然而,最有效的方法是降低交通量。当交通量减少时,包括没有进行设计改变的情况下,大多数参与者都感到安全。此外,还发现了不同自行车骑行者群体之间的重要差异。

相似文献

1
Are bicycle streets cyclist-friendly? Micro-environmental factors for improving perceived safety when cycling in mixed traffic.自行车道对骑车人友好吗?改善混合交通中骑行感知安全的微观环境因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 May;184:107007. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107007. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
2
Do Safe Bike Lanes Really Slow Down Cars? A Simulation-Based Approach to Investigate the Effect of Retrofitting Safe Cycling Lanes on Vehicular Traffic.安全自行车道真的能让汽车减速吗?一种基于模拟的方法来研究改造安全自行车道对车辆交通的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 23;19(7):3818. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073818.
3
Cyclists' perceived safety on intersections and roundabouts - A qualitative bicycle simulator study.自行车手对交叉口和环岛的安全感知——一项定性自行车模拟器研究。
J Safety Res. 2023 Dec;87:143-156. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.09.012. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
4
Stuck in a (literal) tight spot: Cycling between tram rails, sharrows and parked cars.陷入(字面意义上的)困境:在电车轨道、自行车道指示标线和停放的汽车之间穿梭。
J Safety Res. 2023 Dec;87:107-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.09.009. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
5
How much space do drivers provide when passing cyclists? Understanding the impact of motor vehicle and infrastructure characteristics on passing distance.司机在超越自行车时会留出多大的空间?了解机动车和基础设施特征对超越距离的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jul;128:253-260. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
6
Safety assessment of on-road cycling lanes: A comparative study of different layouts using driving simulator.道路骑行道的安全评估:使用驾驶模拟器对不同布局的比较研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Mar;196:107431. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107431. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
7
Traffic Accidents Involving Cyclists Identifying Causal Factors Using Questionnaire Survey, Traffic Accident Data, and Real-World Observation.涉及骑自行车者的交通事故:使用问卷调查、交通事故数据和实际观察来确定因果因素
Stapp Car Crash J. 2016 Nov;60:183-198. doi: 10.4271/2016-22-0008.
8
Bicycle crashes in different riding environments in the Australian capital territory.澳大利亚首都地区不同骑行环境下的自行车事故。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(1):81-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.781591.
9
On-road bicycle lane types, roadway characteristics, and risks for bicycle crashes.道路上的自行车道类型、道路特征与自行车碰撞事故风险。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Feb;123:123-131. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.017. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
10
Protected and unprotected cycle lanes' effects on cyclists' behaviour.保护和非保护自行车道对自行车骑行者行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Jun;171:106668. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106668. Epub 2022 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating Equity Into Bicycle Infrastructure, Planning, and Programming: A Mixed Methods Exploration of Implementation Among Participants in the Bicycle Friendly Community Program.将公平性融入自行车基础设施、规划和项目中:自行车友好社区项目参与者实施过程中的混合方法探索。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Oct 5;20:E89. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.230119.