Internal Medicine Residency, WVU Medicine Camden Clark Medical Center, Parkersburg, WV, USA.
Internal Medicine Residency, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jun;38(6):905-909. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16148. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
Sars-CoV-19 pandemic necessitated a transition to telemedicine for many healthcare encounters. The environmental impact of this transition in gastroenterology (GI) combined with user experience has not been studied.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent telemedicine visits (telephone and video) at a GI clinic at West Virginia University. Distance of patients' residence from clinic × 2 was calculated, and Environmental Protection Agency calculators utilized to calculate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that were avoided from tele-visits. Patients were reached by telephone and were asked questions to fill in a validated Telehealth Usability Questionnaire with Likert scales (1-7). Variables were also collected via chart review.
A total of 81 video and 89 telephone visits were conducted for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) between March 2020 and March 2021. A total of 111 patients were enrolled, with a response rate of 65.29%. Mean age was lower in the video visit cohort compared with the telephone visit cohort (43.45 ± 14.32 years vs 52.34 ± 17.46 years). Most patients had medications prescribed during the visit (79.3%), and a majority had laboratory testing orders placed (57.7%). We calculated a total distance of 8732 miles that the patients would have traveled if they were to present for in-person visits (including return trips). A total of 393.3 gallons of gasoline would have been required to transport these patients to and from the healthcare facility to their residence. A total of 3.5 metric tons of GHG's were saved by avoiding 393.3 gallons of gasoline for travel. In relatable terms, this is equivalent to burning more than 3500 pounds of coal. This averages to 31.5-kg GHG emissions and 3.54 gallons of gasoline saved per patient.
Telemedicine for GERD resulted in significant environmental savings and was rated highly for access, satisfaction, and usability by patients. Telemedicine for GERD can be an excellent alternative to in-person visits.
由于 SARS-CoV-19 大流行,许多医疗保健都需要进行远程医疗,这是必要的。这种转变对肠胃病学(GI)的环境影响以及用户体验尚未得到研究。
我们对西弗吉尼亚大学 GI 诊所进行了一项回顾性队列研究,该研究对象为接受电话和视频远程医疗访问的患者。计算患者住所与诊所之间的距离×2,并利用美国环境保护署(EPA)的计算器来计算因远程访问而避免的温室气体(GHG)排放量。通过电话联系患者,并要求他们回答问题,以填写具有李克特量表(1-7)的经过验证的远程医疗可用性问卷。还通过图表审查收集了变量。
在 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 3 月期间,共进行了 81 次视频和 89 次电话治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)的访问。共有 111 名患者入组,应答率为 65.29%。与电话访问组相比,视频访问组的平均年龄较低(43.45±14.32 岁比 52.34±17.46 岁)。大多数患者在就诊期间开了药(79.3%),并且大多数患者都开了实验室检测订单(57.7%)。我们计算出,如果患者亲自就诊(包括往返),则需要行驶 8732 英里的总里程。需要 393.3 加仑的汽油来运送这些患者往返医疗保健设施和住所。通过避免使用 393.3 加仑的汽油用于旅行,共节省了 3.5 公吨的 GHG。换句话说,这相当于燃烧了 3500 多磅的煤。这平均为每位患者产生 31.5-kg 的 GHG 排放和 3.54 加仑的汽油节省。
GERD 的远程医疗带来了显著的环境节省,并且患者对其访问、满意度和可用性的评价很高。GERD 的远程医疗可以作为面对面就诊的绝佳替代方法。