Ingram R E, Kendall P C, Smith T W, Donnell C, Ronan K
Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, California 92182.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Oct;53(4):734-42. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.53.4.734.
Cognitive approaches to emotional distress posit that specific cognitive factors are critically linked to the etiology, course, or treatment of dysfunction. Although a number of empirical studies have assessed cognitive factors in emotional disorders such as depression and anxiety, research has yet to assess these variables simultaneously and with identical cognitive measures. Using depression and test anxiety as models of dysfunctional affective states, we examined cognitive specificity on measures of information processing, attributions, automatic thinking, and cognitive interference. Results indicated a pattern of specificity showing several differences and similarities in depression and anxiety. Specifically, "purely" depressed individuals showed evidence of selectively processing depressive information, making dysfunctional attributions, and engaging in more negative automatic thinking. "Purely" anxious individuals, on the other hand, showed evidence of selective anxious information processing and increased cognitive interference. Results are discussed in terms of a taxonomy for classifying depressive and anxious cognition.
针对情绪困扰的认知方法认为,特定的认知因素与功能障碍的病因、病程或治疗密切相关。尽管许多实证研究已经评估了诸如抑郁和焦虑等情绪障碍中的认知因素,但尚未同时使用相同的认知测量方法来评估这些变量。我们以抑郁和考试焦虑作为功能失调情感状态的模型,研究了信息处理、归因、自动思维和认知干扰测量方面的认知特异性。结果显示出一种特异性模式,表明抑郁和焦虑存在一些差异和相似之处。具体而言,“纯粹”的抑郁个体表现出选择性处理抑郁信息、做出功能失调归因以及进行更多消极自动思维的证据。另一方面,“纯粹”的焦虑个体表现出选择性处理焦虑信息和认知干扰增加的证据。我们根据一种用于对抑郁和焦虑认知进行分类的分类法对结果进行了讨论。