• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期乳腺癌治疗的共同决策:一项概念演变分析

Shared decision-making for early-stage breast cancer treatment: An evolutionary concept analysis.

作者信息

Chae Heemin, Ji Hee-Ju, Moon Hyunjung, Lee Yeongeun, Son Youn-Jung

机构信息

Department of Nursing, The Graduate School, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Red Cross College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2025 Aug 19;12:100775. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100775. eCollection 2025 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100775
PMID:40919444
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12409458/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The lack of a clear and unified definition of shared decision-making (SDM) may hinder its effective application in oncology care. This study aims to clarify the concept of SDM specifically in the context of early-stage breast cancer treatment through an evolutionary concept analysis.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases for articles published from January 2015 to December 2024. Using keywords "shared decision-making" and "breast cancer," relevant studies were identified, and key attributes of SDM were extracted and synthesized. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

SDM for early-stage breast cancer treatment was characterized by 10 attributes spanning three levels: 1) Patient perspective: involvement in decision-making, values and preferences regarding treatment options, and deliberative thinking to achieve choice certainty; 2) Healthcare professional perspective: provision of individualized information, psychological support, consultation focused on patients' best interests, collaborative partnerships with patients, coordinated care delivery, and promotion of person-centered, informed choices; 3) Healthcare system level: fostering a patient-centered healthcare culture.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide a comprehensive conceptual framework to guide the development of detailed SDM guidelines tailored for early-stage breast cancer patients. Enhanced understanding of SDM can support nurses and healthcare professionals in facilitating collaborative and optimal decision-making processes within oncology care. Furthermore, this study lays the groundwork for developing measurement tools and disease-specific interventions to advance SDM implementation in early-stage breast cancer treatment.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42024587218).

摘要

目的

缺乏对共同决策(SDM)清晰统一的定义可能会阻碍其在肿瘤护理中的有效应用。本研究旨在通过进化概念分析,明确SDM在早期乳腺癌治疗背景下的具体概念。

方法

在PubMed、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Cochrane和EMBASE数据库中进行系统检索,查找2015年1月至2024年12月发表的文章。使用关键词“共同决策”和“乳腺癌”,识别相关研究,并提取和综合SDM的关键属性。16项研究符合纳入标准。

结果

早期乳腺癌治疗的SDM具有10个属性,分为三个层次:1)患者视角:参与决策、对治疗方案的价值观和偏好,以及通过审慎思考以确定选择;2)医疗专业人员视角:提供个性化信息、心理支持、以患者最佳利益为重点的咨询、与患者的合作关系、协调护理提供,以及促进以患者为中心的知情选择;3)医疗系统层面:培育以患者为中心的医疗文化。

结论

这些发现提供了一个全面的概念框架,以指导为早期乳腺癌患者量身定制详细的SDM指南的制定。对SDM的深入理解可以支持护士和医疗专业人员在肿瘤护理中促进协作和优化决策过程。此外,本研究为开发测量工具和针对特定疾病的干预措施奠定了基础,以推进SDM在早期乳腺癌治疗中的实施。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO(CRD42024587218)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/176f/12409458/9aee287420f5/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/176f/12409458/9aee287420f5/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/176f/12409458/9aee287420f5/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Shared decision-making for early-stage breast cancer treatment: An evolutionary concept analysis.早期乳腺癌治疗的共同决策:一项概念演变分析
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2025 Aug 19;12:100775. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100775. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Shared decision-making for supporting women's decisions about breast cancer screening.支持女性进行乳腺癌筛查决策的共享决策。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 10;5(5):CD013822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013822.pub2.
3
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
4
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员采用共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2.
5
Interventions for promoting participation in shared decision-making for children with cancer.促进癌症患儿参与共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 29;11(11):CD008970. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008970.pub3.
6
Interventions for promoting participation in shared decision-making for children with cancer.促进癌症患儿参与共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 6(6):CD008970. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008970.pub2.
7
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
8
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
9
Engaging patients in health care decisions in the emergency department through shared decision-making: a systematic review.通过共同决策让患者参与急诊科的医疗决策:系统评价。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Aug;19(8):959-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01414.x. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
10
Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员共同决策使用率的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 19;7(7):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Leading with options or issues to support purposeful shared decision-making in clinical practice.以各种选择或问题为导向,支持临床实践中有目的的共同决策。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025 Apr 1. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-113322.
2
Shared Decision-Making Tools Implemented in the Electronic Health Record: Scoping Review.电子健康记录中实施的共同决策工具:范围审查
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 21;27:e59956. doi: 10.2196/59956.
3
Saving Shared Decision-Making.挽救共同决策。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jun;40(8):1844-1847. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09410-z. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
4
Decision Regret About Treatment Amongst Women With Early Breast Cancer: An Integrative Review.早期乳腺癌女性对治疗的决策遗憾:一项综合综述。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Jan 22. doi: 10.1111/jan.16767.
5
Facilitators and barriers to decision-making for hospital treatment among patients diagnosed with breast cancer in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A qualitative urban-based study.坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆乳腺癌确诊患者医院治疗决策的促进因素和障碍:一项基于城市的定性研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Nov 7;4(11):e0003366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003366. eCollection 2024.
6
Shared decision-making supported by outcome information regarding surveillance after curative treatment for breast cancer: Results of the SHOUT-BC study.支持基于癌症治疗后监测结果信息的共享决策:SHOUT-BC 研究结果。
Eur J Cancer. 2024 Dec;213:115107. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.115107. Epub 2024 Nov 2.
7
When western concept meets eastern culture: Exploring the impact of Confucianism on shared decision-making in China.当西方观念遇上东方文化:探究儒家思想对中国共同决策的影响。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Sep 2;11(11):100586. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100586. eCollection 2024 Nov.
8
Breast cancer patients' perspectives and needs about wed-based surgical decision aid: A qualitative study.乳腺癌患者对基于网络的手术决策辅助工具的看法和需求:一项定性研究。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Oct;72:102689. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102689. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
9
Association between Cognitive Function and Physical Function, Frailty, and Quality of Life in Older Breast Cancer Survivors.老年乳腺癌幸存者认知功能与身体功能、衰弱及生活质量之间的关联
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jul 31;16(15):2718. doi: 10.3390/cancers16152718.
10
Patient Preferences Influencing Treatment Decision-Making in Early-Stage Breast Cancer in Germany, Italy, and Japan.德国、意大利和日本早期乳腺癌患者偏好对治疗决策的影响
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Jul 25;18:1517-1530. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S450316. eCollection 2024.