Castro Arizaldo E, De Ungria Maria Corazon A
Microbial Ecology of Terrestrial and Aquatic Systems Laboratory, Institute of Biology, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines.
DNA Analysis Laboratory, Natural Sciences Research Institute, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines.
Forensic Sci Res. 2022 Mar 23;7(4):650-661. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2021.2023272. eCollection 2022.
This review discusses microbial forensics as an emerging science that finds application in protecting human health. It is important to distinguish naturally acquired infections from those caused by the intentional release of microorganisms to the environment. This information is crucial in formulating procedures against the spread of infectious diseases and prosecuting persons who may be involved in acts of biocrime, bioterrorism, or biowarfare. A comparison between epidemiological investigations and microbial forensic investigations is provided. In addition, a discussion on how microbial forensics strengthens health systems is included in this review. Microbial forensic investigations and epidemiologic examinations employ similar concepts and involve identifying and characterising the microbe of interest. Both fields require formulating an appropriate case definition, determining a pathogen's mode of transmission, and identifying the source(s) of infection. However, the two subdisciplines differ in their objectives. An epidemiological investigation aims to identify the pathogen's source to prevent the spread of the disease. Microbial forensics focuses on source-tracking to facilitate the prosecution of persons responsible for the spread of a pathogen. Both fields use molecular techniques in analysing and comparing DNA, gene products, and biomolecules to identify and characterise the microorganisms of interest. We included case studies to show methods used in microbial forensic investigations, a brief discussion of the public significance of microbial forensic systems, and a roadmap for establishing a system at a national level. This system is expected to strengthen a country's capacity to respond to public health emergencies. Several factors must be considered in establishing national microbial forensic systems. First is the inherent ubiquity, diversity, and adaptability of microorganisms that warrants the use of robust and accurate molecular typing systems. Second, the availability of facilities and scientists who have been trained in epidemiology, molecular biology, bioinformatics, and data analytics. Human resources and infrastructure are critical requirements because formulating strategies and allocating resources in times of infectious disease outbreaks must be data-driven. Establishing and maintaining a national microbial forensic system to strengthen capacities in conducting forensic and epidemiological investigations should be prioritised by all countries, accompanied by a national policy that sets the legislative framework and provides for the system's financial requirements.
本综述讨论了微生物法医学这一新兴科学,它在保护人类健康方面有应用价值。区分自然获得的感染与因微生物故意释放到环境中而导致的感染很重要。这些信息对于制定针对传染病传播的程序以及起诉可能参与生物犯罪、生物恐怖主义或生物战行为的人至关重要。本文对流行病学调查和微生物法医调查进行了比较。此外,本综述还讨论了微生物法医学如何加强卫生系统。微生物法医调查和流行病学检查采用相似的概念,都涉及识别和表征感兴趣的微生物。这两个领域都需要制定适当的病例定义,确定病原体的传播方式,并识别感染源。然而,这两个子学科的目标不同。流行病学调查旨在识别病原体来源以防止疾病传播。微生物法医学专注于溯源,以便利起诉应对病原体传播负责的人员。这两个领域都使用分子技术来分析和比较DNA、基因产物和生物分子,以识别和表征感兴趣的微生物。我们纳入了案例研究以展示微生物法医调查中使用的方法,简要讨论了微生物法医系统的公共意义,以及在国家层面建立该系统的路线图。该系统有望加强一个国家应对突发公共卫生事件的能力。建立国家微生物法医系统时必须考虑几个因素。首先是微生物固有的普遍性、多样性和适应性,这就需要使用强大而准确的分子分型系统。其次是具备在流行病学、分子生物学、生物信息学和数据分析方面受过培训的设施和科学家。人力资源和基础设施是关键要求,因为在传染病暴发时制定策略和分配资源必须以数据为驱动。所有国家都应优先建立和维护国家微生物法医系统,以加强法医和流行病学调查能力,并配套一项国家政策,该政策要设定立法框架并为该系统提供资金需求。