Martynenko Nataliia
Department of Political Sciences and Law, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, 31, Povitroflotsky Avenue, Kyiv, 03037, Ukraine.
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024 Dec 11;9:100565. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100565. eCollection 2024.
The relevance of the issues studied in this article is due to the need to form an efficiently functioning system of regulating forensic expert activity in general and its individual components, in particular, financial support, taking into account positive foreign experience. The author proposes to introduce separate budget programmes for state specialised institutions of each state agency, which will help to resolve the issues of proper funding and justification of expenditures, and will serve as an anti-corruption factor. Attention is focused on the need to develop a unified methodological approach to calculating the number of forensic examinations. The author emphasises the importance of summarizing the financial statements of state specialised institutions engaged in forensic activities and making them available to the public. It is stated that there is an urgent necessity to find reasonable opportunities to expand the financial autonomy of state specialised institutions. The author proves the need to include forensic experts in the list of persons obliged to file declarations and introduce financial monitoring of forensic experts' lifestyle. The author concludes that it is expedient to introduce a mixed system for determining the cost of forensic examinations.
本文所研究问题的相关性源于这样一种需求,即要形成一个总体上有效运作的法医鉴定活动监管体系及其各个组成部分,特别是考虑到国外的积极经验,形成财政支持体系。作者提议为每个国家机构的国家专门机构引入单独的预算方案,这将有助于解决适当资金和支出合理性的问题,并将成为一个反腐败因素。注意力集中在制定统一的法医鉴定数量计算方法的必要性上。作者强调了汇总从事法医活动的国家专门机构财务报表并向公众公开的重要性。指出迫切需要找到合理的机会来扩大国家专门机构的财务自主权。作者证明有必要将法医专家列入必须提交申报的人员名单,并对法医专家的生活方式进行财务监测。作者得出结论,采用混合系统来确定法医鉴定费用是适宜的。