McElwain Nancy L, Hu Yannan, Li Xiaomei, Fisher Meghan C, Baldwin Jenny C, Bodway Jordan M
Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Agricultural, Consumer, and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.
Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 16;12:734492. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734492. eCollection 2021.
The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated innovations in data collection protocols, including use of virtual or remote visits. Although developmental scientists used virtual visits prior to COVID-19, validation of virtual assessments of infant socioemotional and language development are lacking. We aimed to fill this gap by validating a virtual visit protocol that assesses mother and infant behavior during the Still Face Paradigm (SFP) and infant receptive and expressive communication using the Bayley-III Screening Test. Validation was accomplished through comparisons of data (i.e., proportions of missing data for a given task; observed infant and maternal behaviors) collected during in-person laboratory visits and virtual visits conducted Zoom. Of the 119 mother-infant dyads who participated, 73 participated in lab visits only, 13 participated in virtual visits only, and 33 dyads participated in a combination of lab and virtual visits across four time points (3, 6, 9, and 12 months). Maternal perspectives of, and preferences for, virtual visits were also assessed. Proportions of missing data were higher during virtual visits, particularly for assessments of infant receptive communication. Nonetheless, comparisons of virtual and laboratory visits within a given time point (3, 6, or 9 months) indicated that mothers and infants showed similar proportions of facial expressions, vocalizations and directions of gaze during the SFP and infants showed similar and expected patterns of behavioral change across SFP episodes. Infants also demonstrated comparable expressive and receptive communicative abilities across virtual and laboratory assessments. Maternal reports of ease and preference for virtual visits varied by infant age, with mothers of 12-month-old infants reporting, on average, less ease of virtual visits and a preference for in-person visits. Results are discussed in terms of feasibility and validity of virtual visits for assessing infant socioemotional and language development, and broader advantages and disadvantages of virtual visits are also considered.
新冠疫情促使数据收集协议进行创新,包括使用虚拟或远程访视。尽管发展科学家在新冠疫情之前就已使用虚拟访视,但对婴儿社会情感和语言发展的虚拟评估的验证仍很缺乏。我们旨在通过验证一种虚拟访视协议来填补这一空白,该协议使用贝利婴幼儿发展量表第三版筛查测试评估静脸范式(SFP)期间的母婴行为以及婴儿的接受性和表达性沟通能力。通过比较在面对面实验室访视和通过Zoom进行的虚拟访视期间收集的数据(即给定任务的缺失数据比例;观察到的婴儿和母亲行为)来完成验证。在参与的119对母婴二元组中,73对仅参与了实验室访视,13对仅参与了虚拟访视,33对二元组在四个时间点(3、6、9和12个月)参与了实验室访视和虚拟访视的组合。还评估了母亲对虚拟访视的看法和偏好。虚拟访视期间的缺失数据比例更高,尤其是在评估婴儿接受性沟通方面。尽管如此,在给定时间点(3、6或9个月)内对虚拟访视和实验室访视的比较表明,母亲和婴儿在SFP期间表现出相似比例的面部表情、发声和注视方向,并且婴儿在SFP各阶段表现出相似且预期的行为变化模式。在虚拟评估和实验室评估中,婴儿还表现出相当的表达性和接受性沟通能力。母亲对虚拟访视的轻松程度和偏好报告因婴儿年龄而异,12个月大婴儿的母亲平均报告虚拟访视的轻松程度较低,更倾向于面对面访视。本文从虚拟访视评估婴儿社会情感和语言发展的可行性和有效性方面进行了讨论,并考虑了虚拟访视更广泛的优缺点。