Gouret Florian, Pfeuffer Christina U
Cognition, Action, and Sustainability Unit, Department of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Human-Technology Interaction, Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany.
J Cogn. 2023 Feb 10;6(1):15. doi: 10.5334/joc.261. eCollection 2023.
When an action contingently yields a predictable effect, we form bi-directional action-effect associations that allow us to anticipate both the location and timing of our actions' effects. This is evident in anticipatory eye movements towards the future effect's location which are performed earlier when the effect's delay is short rather than long. Such anticipatory eye movements reflect a proactive process of effect monitoring which prepares a comparison of expected and actual effects. Here, in two online eye tracking experiments, we manipulated effect locations (spatially compatible vs. incompatible in one half) and effect delays (short vs. long) to determine whether in-laboratory effects could be reliably replicated online using participants' individual webcams. Extending prior research, we further compared irrelevant (Experiment 1) to relevant effects (response to effect feature; Experiment 2). In contrast to prior in-laboratory studies, participants anticipatorily looked towards future effects above chance only when effects were relevant. Post-experiment questions suggested that online-participants intentionally ignore irrelevant information to optimize task performance. Nevertheless, replicating in-laboratory experiments, both for relevant and irrelevant effects, participants' first saccade towards a future effect occurred earlier for the short rather than the long effect delay. Thus, we demonstrate that anticipatory eye movements reflecting a time-sensitive proactive effect monitoring process can reliably be assessed both in-laboratory as well as online. However, when investigating anticipatory saccade frequencies online, additional aspects like effect relevance have to be considered.
当一个动作偶然产生可预测的效果时,我们会形成双向的动作-效果关联,使我们能够预测动作效果的位置和时间。这在朝向未来效果位置的预期眼动中很明显,当效果延迟较短而非较长时,这种眼动会更早进行。这种预期眼动反映了一种主动的效果监测过程,该过程准备对预期效果和实际效果进行比较。在此,在两项在线眼动追踪实验中,我们操纵了效果位置(一半空间兼容,一半空间不兼容)和效果延迟(短延迟与长延迟),以确定实验室中的效果是否可以使用参与者的个人网络摄像头在在线环境中可靠地复制。扩展先前的研究,我们进一步比较了无关效果(实验1)和相关效果(对效果特征的反应;实验2)。与先前的实验室研究不同,只有当效果相关时,参与者才会以高于机会水平的频率预期看向未来效果。实验后的问题表明,在线参与者会故意忽略无关信息以优化任务表现。然而,与实验室实验一致,对于相关和无关效果,参与者首次朝向未来效果的扫视在效果延迟短而非长时出现得更早。因此,我们证明反映时间敏感的主动效果监测过程的预期眼动在实验室和在线环境中都可以可靠地评估。然而,在在线研究预期扫视频率时,必须考虑效果相关性等其他因素。