Suppr超能文献

基于指数倾斜和超级学习器的因果推断中未测量混杂因素的敏感性分析。

Sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding in causal inference based on exponential tilting and super learner.

作者信息

Zhou Mi, Yao Weixin

机构信息

Department of Statistics, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Stat. 2021 Nov 10;50(3):744-760. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2021.1999398. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Causal inference under the potential outcome framework relies on the strongly ignorable treatment assumption. This assumption is usually questionable in observational studies, and the unmeasured confounding is one of the fundamental challenges in causal inference. To this end, we propose a new sensitivity analysis method to evaluate the impact of the unmeasured confounder by leveraging ideas of doubly robust estimators, the exponential tilt method, and the super learner algorithm. Compared to other existing methods of sensitivity analysis that parameterize the unmeasured confounder as a latent variable in the working models, the exponential tilting method does not impose any restrictions on the structure or models of the unmeasured confounders. In addition, in order to reduce the modeling bias of traditional parametric methods, we propose incorporating the super learner machine learning algorithm to perform nonparametric model estimation and the corresponding sensitivity analysis. Furthermore, most existing sensitivity analysis methods require multivariate sensitivity parameters, which make its choice difficult and subjective in practice. In comparison, the new method has a univariate sensitivity parameter with a nice and simple interpretation of log-odds ratios for binary outcomes, which makes its choice and the application of the new sensitivity analysis method very easy for practitioners.

摘要

潜在结果框架下的因果推断依赖于强可忽略治疗假设。在观察性研究中,这一假设通常存在问题,而未测量的混杂因素是因果推断中的基本挑战之一。为此,我们提出一种新的敏感性分析方法,通过利用双重稳健估计量、指数倾斜法和超级学习算法的思想来评估未测量混杂因素的影响。与其他现有的敏感性分析方法相比,这些方法将未测量的混杂因素参数化为工作模型中的潜在变量,而指数倾斜法对未测量混杂因素的结构或模型不施加任何限制。此外,为了减少传统参数方法的建模偏差,我们建议纳入超级学习机器学习算法来进行非参数模型估计和相应的敏感性分析。此外,大多数现有的敏感性分析方法需要多变量敏感性参数,这使得其在实践中的选择既困难又主观。相比之下,新方法有一个单变量敏感性参数,对于二元结果具有对数优势比的简洁解释,这使得从业者对新敏感性分析方法的选择和应用非常容易。

相似文献

1
Sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding in causal inference based on exponential tilting and super learner.
J Appl Stat. 2021 Nov 10;50(3):744-760. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2021.1999398. eCollection 2023.
2
Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounding for binary outcomes using confounding functions.
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Aug 1;46(4):1303-1311. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx023.
3
Tuning Random Forests for Causal Inference under Cluster-Level Unmeasured Confounding.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2023 Mar-Apr;58(2):408-440. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2021.1994364. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
5
Sensitivity Analysis Without Assumptions.
Epidemiology. 2016 May;27(3):368-77. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000457.
6
Multiply robust causal inference with double-negative control adjustment for categorical unmeasured confounding.
J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2020 Apr;82(2):521-540. doi: 10.1111/rssb.12361. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
7
Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounders for credible and reliable real-world evidence.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Oct;29(10):1219-1227. doi: 10.1002/pds.5117. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
8
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR UNMEASURED CONFOUNDING IN COARSE STRUCTURAL NESTED MEAN MODELS.
Stat Sin. 2018 Oct;28(4):1703-1723. doi: 10.5705/ss.202016.0133.
10
A flexible, interpretable framework for assessing sensitivity to unmeasured confounding.
Stat Med. 2016 Sep 10;35(20):3453-70. doi: 10.1002/sim.6973. Epub 2016 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Editorial to the special issue: Statistical Approaches for Big Data and Machine Learning.
J Appl Stat. 2023 Feb 7;50(3):451-455. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2023.2162471. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Survival analysis of heart failure patients: A case study.
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 20;12(7):e0181001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181001. eCollection 2017.
2
Sensitivity Analysis in Observational Research: Introducing the E-Value.
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Aug 15;167(4):268-274. doi: 10.7326/M16-2607. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
3
A comparison of Bayesian and Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding.
Stat Med. 2017 Aug 15;36(18):2887-2901. doi: 10.1002/sim.7298. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
4
A Bayesian nonparametric approach to marginal structural models for point treatments and a continuous or survival outcome.
Biostatistics. 2017 Jan;18(1):32-47. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxw029. Epub 2016 Jun 26.
5
A flexible, interpretable framework for assessing sensitivity to unmeasured confounding.
Stat Med. 2016 Sep 10;35(20):3453-70. doi: 10.1002/sim.6973. Epub 2016 May 3.
6
Sensitivity Analysis Without Assumptions.
Epidemiology. 2016 May;27(3):368-77. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000457.
7
Improved double-robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.
Biometrika. 2012 Jun;99(2):439-456. doi: 10.1093/biomet/ass013. Epub 2012 Apr 29.
8
Sensitivity analyses to estimate the potential impact of unmeasured confounding in causal research.
Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Feb;39(1):107-17. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp332. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
9
Super learner.
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2007;6:Article25. doi: 10.2202/1544-6115.1309. Epub 2007 Sep 16.
10
Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies.
Stat Med. 2007 May 20;26(11):2331-47. doi: 10.1002/sim.2711.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验