Morphometric Examination of the Sacroiliac Region and Variable Positions of the Sacral Auricular Surface: Anatomical Classification and Importance.

OBJECTIVES

Anatomical variations of the sacrum involve alterations in the number of sacral segments, auricular surface area, and neural arch dimensions and are associated with biomechanical, surgical, and obstetric implications. Due to the complex functional structure of the sacroiliac (SI) joints, it was aimed to evaluate their morphometric structure, classify the sacrum, and group different locations of the auricular surface in the sacrums.

METHODS

Sex determination was made in 91 dry human sacra. Determination of the alpha angle on the sagittal axis of the auricular surface of the sacrum and classification of the auricular surface of the sacrum was performed. The sacra were studied to determine the position and extent of their auricular surfaces in relation to the sacral segments. Specimens were grouped as "normal," "high-up," and "low-down" auricular surface-bearing sacra. The sacral surface areas were measured, and SI joints were classified into three types morphologically (types I, II, and III). The depth and anterior-posterior length of the cranial, middle, and caudal impressions observed in the posterior sacrum and anterior-posterior lengths were measured.

RESULTS

The measurements made for sex determination showed that 46 of the sacra were from females and 45 were from males. The alpha angle on the sagittal axis of the sacral auricular surface was found to be greatest at the level of the first posterior sacral foramina. While the most common sacrum type was Type III, the least common type was Type I. The surface area of facies auricularis was found to be larger in males than in females. With regard to facies auricularis in all sacrum groups, although it covered approximately 2.5 sacral vertebrae, there was a difference in the location of facies auricularis in the sacral vertebrae. A statistically significant difference was found between right and left in the depth values of the impressions in the dorsal surface of the sacrum (p <0.05).

CONCLUSION

The position of the auricular surface in the sacrum differed among individuals. These differences are associated with variable load-bearing in the SI joints. The biomechanical classification of the sacrum and localization of the auricular surface can provide information about the anatomic source of low back pain or help predict the location of low back pain. Changes in the synovial surface morphology of the SI joints may elicit sacroiliac joint pain. This study was conducted because it is considered that the location of the auricular surface can significantly affect load-bearing patterns of the sacrum.