• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学的去专业化:原因、影响及应对措施

The deprofessionalization of medicine. Causes, effects, and responses.

作者信息

Reed R R, Evans D

机构信息

Reed Medical Group, Chartered, Lawrence, KS 66044.

出版信息

JAMA. 1987 Dec 11;258(22):3279-82.

PMID:3682117
Abstract

In this article, we examine the components of medical professionalism; identify the roots of the loss of professional autonomy by physicians in the United States--a process that, in effect, is leading to the deprofessionalization of American medicine; discuss why such deprofessionalization is undesirable for the society; and explore three health care delivery systems and their effects on deprofessionalization. We suggest that a system based on organizations set up and directed by physicians will be the system that best preserves medical professionalism and serves the public interest.

摘要

在本文中,我们审视了医学职业精神的构成要素;找出美国医生丧失职业自主性的根源——这一过程实际上正导致美国医学的非职业化;探讨为何这种非职业化对社会不利;并探究三种医疗服务体系及其对非职业化的影响。我们认为,基于由医生建立和主导的组织的体系将是最能维护医学职业精神并服务于公众利益的体系。

相似文献

1
The deprofessionalization of medicine. Causes, effects, and responses.医学的去专业化:原因、影响及应对措施
JAMA. 1987 Dec 11;258(22):3279-82.
2
[Deprofessionalization or reprofessionalization: a study comparing law and medicine].[去专业化还是再专业化:一项比较法律与医学的研究]
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 1994 Jul-Sep;40(3):211-5.
3
The changing character of the medical profession: a theoretical overview.
Milbank Q. 1988;66 Suppl 2:10-32.
4
Professionalism, physician autonomy, and the new economics of medicine.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Aug;171(2):293-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70025-7.
5
Medical professionalism and the future of public trust in physicians.医学职业精神与公众对医生信任的未来。
JAMA. 2015 May 12;313(18):1827-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.4172.
6
A re-examination of the hypothesis of physician deprofessionalization.
Milbank Q. 1988;66 Suppl 2:48-56.
7
The professional dominance perspective, revisited.再探专业主导视角。
Milbank Q. 1988;66 Suppl 2:33-47.
8
Organized practice and the quality of medical care.有组织的医疗实践与医疗质量。
Inquiry. 1988 Spring;25(1):78-89.
9
Medical professionalism in a commercialized health care market.商业化医疗保健市场中的医学职业精神。
JAMA. 2007 Dec 12;298(22):2668-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.22.2668.
10
New models for hospital-affiliated medical group practice: the use of medical foundations and management service organizations.
Hosp Strategy Rep. 1992 Jul;4(9):1, 3-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Shattered assumptions: Unravelling of the social contract between the medical profession and society in India.破碎的假设:印度医学界与社会之间社会契约的瓦解。
SSM Health Syst. 2025 Jun;4:100070. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100070.
2
Incongruous identities: Mental distress and burnout disparities in LGBTQ+ health care professional populations.不一致的身份认同:LGBTQ+医疗保健专业人群中的精神困扰与职业倦怠差异
Heliyon. 2023 Apr;9(4):e14835. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14835. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
3
Professional Identity Misformation and Burnout: A Call for Graduate Medical Education to Reject "Provider".
职业身份形成不良与职业倦怠:呼吁毕业后医学教育摒弃“医疗服务提供者”这一称谓
J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Apr;13(2):167-169. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-01100.1. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
4
The impacts of corporatisation of healthcare on medical practice and professionals in Maharashtra, India.印度马哈拉施特拉邦医疗保健机构企业化对医疗实践和专业人员的影响。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Feb 11;5(2):e002026. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002026. eCollection 2020.
5
Professional promises and limits on the scope of practice.专业承诺与执业范围限制
HEC Forum. 2005 Sep;17(3):196-209. doi: 10.1007/s10730-005-2547-x.
6
A loss of faith: the sources of reduced political legitimacy for the American medical profession.信仰的丧失:美国医学职业政治合法性降低的根源。
Milbank Q. 2002;80(2):185-235. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00010.
7
SAGES and surgical education: assuring that history does not repeat itself.SAGES与外科教育:确保历史不再重演。
Surg Endosc. 2001 Aug;15(8):775-80. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8324-2. Epub 2001 Jun 19.
8
Who's in charge here? Maximizing patient benefit and professional authority by physician limit setting.这里谁负责?通过设定医生权限来最大化患者利益和专业权威。
J Gen Intern Med. 1994 Aug;9(8):450-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02599063.
9
Changes in positions of authority held by US physicians: a fresh look at existing data.美国医生所担任的权威职位的变化:对现有数据的新审视。
Am J Public Health. 1994 Oct;84(10):1573-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.10.1573.
10
Risk factors associated with participation in the Ontario, Canada doctors' strike.与参与加拿大安大略省医生罢工相关的风险因素。
Am J Public Health. 1989 Sep;79(9):1227-33. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.9.1227.