• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

10 年后,口服食物挑战仍将成为过敏护理的一部分吗?

Will Oral Food Challenges Still Be Part of Allergy Care in 10 Years' Time?

机构信息

National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Food Allergy Center and Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Disease, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Apr;11(4):988-996. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.02.010. Epub 2023 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2023.02.010
PMID:36822320
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10698627/
Abstract

Oral food challenges (OFCs) are currently the definitive diagnostic procedure in food allergy. Their design has evolved over the decades to maximize safety, optimize convenience, and address several specific clinical questions. However, they are a resource-intensive investigation that carry a risk for severe allergic reaction in which fatal outcomes, although rare, have been reported. In this review, we explore the many roles that OFC fulfil in the clinical and research settings. We also discuss progress that has been made in developing alternative diagnostic tools and how far these have reached in offering a viable replacement to OFC in clinical practice. Finally, we discuss the ongoing importance of research OFC to improve the future diagnostic capabilities of novel diagnostic tools.

摘要

口服食物挑战(OFCs)目前是食物过敏的明确诊断程序。几十年来,它们的设计不断发展,以最大限度地提高安全性、优化便利性,并解决几个具体的临床问题。然而,它们是一种资源密集型的调查,存在严重过敏反应的风险,尽管罕见,但已有报道。在这篇综述中,我们探讨了 OFC 在临床和研究环境中所扮演的多种角色。我们还讨论了在开发替代诊断工具方面取得的进展,以及这些工具在临床实践中替代 OFC 的可行性。最后,我们讨论了研究 OFC 对提高新型诊断工具未来诊断能力的持续重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/951d/10698627/6d1fdc9864e3/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/951d/10698627/0271f60abe9b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/951d/10698627/6d1fdc9864e3/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/951d/10698627/0271f60abe9b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/951d/10698627/6d1fdc9864e3/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Will Oral Food Challenges Still Be Part of Allergy Care in 10 Years' Time?10 年后,口服食物挑战仍将成为过敏护理的一部分吗?
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Apr;11(4):988-996. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.02.010. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
2
Diagnostic utility of allergy tests to predict baked egg and lightly cooked egg allergies compared to double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges.过敏原检测对预测烘焙鸡蛋和轻度烹饪鸡蛋过敏的诊断效用与双盲安慰剂对照食物激发试验的比较。
Allergy. 2023 Sep;78(9):2510-2522. doi: 10.1111/all.15797. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
3
Analysis of a Large Standardized Food Challenge Data Set to Determine Predictors of Positive Outcome Across Multiple Allergens.分析大型标准化食物挑战数据集,以确定多种过敏原阳性结果的预测因素。
Front Immunol. 2018 Nov 27;9:2689. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02689. eCollection 2018.
4
Improving Diagnostic Accuracy in Food Allergy.提高食物过敏的诊断准确性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Jan;9(1):71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.09.037.
5
Advances in Food Allergy Diagnosis.食物过敏诊断的进展
Curr Pediatr Rev. 2018;14(3):139-149. doi: 10.2174/1573396314666180423105842.
6
Diagnostic oral food challenges: procedures and biomarkers.诊断性口服食物激发试验:程序和生物标志物。
J Immunol Methods. 2012 Sep 28;383(1-2):30-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2012.02.019. Epub 2012 Mar 4.
7
Road map for the clinical application of the basophil activation test in food allergy.嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验在食物过敏临床应用的路线图。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2017 Sep;47(9):1115-1124. doi: 10.1111/cea.12964. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
8
Clinical and immunochemical profiles of food challenge proven or anaphylactic shrimp allergy in tropical Singapore.热带新加坡经食物激发试验证实或过敏反应性虾过敏的临床和免疫化学特征。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2015 Mar;45(3):687-97. doi: 10.1111/cea.12416.
9
The dilemma of open or double-blind food challenges in diagnosing food allergy in children: Design of the ALDORADO trial.儿童食物过敏诊断中开放性或双盲食物挑战的困境:ALDORADO 试验设计。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2022 Jan;33(1):e13654. doi: 10.1111/pai.13654. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
10
The predictive value of skin prick testing for challenge-proven food allergy: a systematic review.皮肤点刺试验对已证实食物过敏挑战的预测价值:系统评价。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2012 Jun;23(4):347-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01237.x. Epub 2011 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Cow milk protein allergy mimics in infancy.婴儿期牛奶蛋白过敏的模仿症状。
World J Clin Pediatr. 2025 Sep 9;14(3):103788. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v14.i3.103788.
2
US food allergy patients' experiences, priorities, and needs: A qualitative study.美国食物过敏患者的经历、优先事项和需求:一项定性研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2025 Apr 22;4(3):100482. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100482. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Biomarker-driven drug development for allergic diseases and asthma: An FDA public workshop.基于生物标志物的过敏性疾病和哮喘药物研发:美国食品药品监督管理局公开研讨会

本文引用的文献

1
Basophil activation test has high reproducibility and is feasible in the clinical setting.嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验具有较高的可重复性,并且在临床环境中可行。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2022 Oct;33(11):e13870. doi: 10.1111/pai.13870.
2
Predicting probability of tolerating discrete amounts of peanut protein in allergic children using epitope-specific IgE antibody profiling.使用表位特异性 IgE 抗体分析预测过敏儿童耐受离散量花生蛋白的概率。
Allergy. 2022 Oct;77(10):3061-3069. doi: 10.1111/all.15477. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
3
Reproducibility of food challenge to cow's milk: Systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2025 Jun;155(6):1753-1766. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2025.03.014. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
4
Basophil Activation Test for the Improved Diagnosis of Peanut and Tree Nut Allergy.用于改进花生和坚果过敏诊断的嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2025 Mar 20;25(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s11882-025-01200-1.
5
Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals a Causal Relationship Between Allergic Rhinitis and Hazelnut Allergy.全基因组关联研究揭示过敏性鼻炎与榛子过敏之间的因果关系。
Allergy. 2025 Jan;80(1):309-318. doi: 10.1111/all.16411. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
6
The future of food allergy diagnosis.食物过敏诊断的未来。
Front Allergy. 2024 Nov 7;5:1456585. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2024.1456585. eCollection 2024.
7
Omalizumab Implementation in Practice: Lessons Learned From the OUtMATCH Study.奥马珠单抗的实际应用:来自 OUtMATCH 研究的经验教训。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Nov;12(11):2947-2954. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.08.056. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
8
Understanding the heterogeneity of childhood allergic sensitization and its relationship with asthma.了解儿童过敏致敏的异质性及其与哮喘的关系。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 Apr 1;24(2):79-87. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000967. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
牛奶食物挑战重现性的系统评价:个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Nov;150(5):1135-1143.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.04.035. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
4
Organ-specific symptom patterns during oral food challenge in children with peanut and tree nut allergy.儿童花生和树坚果过敏口服食物激发试验中的器官特异性症状模式。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2022 May;33(5):e13778. doi: 10.1111/pai.13778.
5
Single low-dose exposure to cow's milk at diagnosis accelerates cow's milk allergic infants' progress on a milk ladder programme.单次低剂量摄入牛奶可加速牛奶过敏婴儿在牛奶梯方案中的进展。
Allergy. 2022 Sep;77(9):2760-2769. doi: 10.1111/all.15312. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
6
Reply.回复。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Mar;149(3):1129-1131. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.12.766. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
7
Food allergen ladders: A need for standardization.食物过敏原阶梯:标准化的需求。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2022 Jan;33(1):e13714. doi: 10.1111/pai.13714. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
8
No apparent impact of incremental dosing on eliciting dose at double-blind, placebo-controlled peanut challenge.在双盲、安慰剂对照的花生激发试验中,递增给药对激发剂量无明显影响。
Allergy. 2022 Feb;77(2):667-670. doi: 10.1111/all.15130. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
9
Bringing the Next Generation of Food Allergy Diagnostics Into the Clinic.将下一代食物过敏诊断技术推向临床应用。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Jan;10(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.09.009. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
10
Oral Food Challenge for FPIES in Practice-A Survey: Report from the Work Group on FPIES Within the Adverse Reactions to Foods Committee, FAED IS, AAAAI.FPIES 口食挑战的实践调查:来自 FAED IS 食物不良反应委员会 FPIES 工作组的报告,AAAI。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Oct;9(10):3608-3614.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.06.061. Epub 2021 Sep 2.