Center for Health Services Research, Seebad 82/83, 15562 Rüdersdorf Bei Berlin, Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany.
Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School, Fehrbelliner Straße 38, 16816, Neuruppin, Germany.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 23;23(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09166-4.
The provision of low-value physiotherapy services in low back pain management is a known but complex phenomenon. Thus, this scoping review aims to systematically map existing research designs and instruments of the field in order to discuss the current state of research methodologies and contextualize results to domains and perspectives of a referred low-value care typology. Ultimately, results will be illustrated and transferred to conditions of the German health care setting as care delivery conditions of physiotherapy in Germany face unique particularities.
The development of this review is guided by the analysis framework of Arksey and O'Malley. A two-stage, audited search strategy was performed in Medline (PubMed), Web of Science, and google scholar. All types of observational studies were included. Identified articles needed to address a pre-determined population, concept, and context framework and had to be published in English or German language. The publication date of included articles was not subject to any limitation. The applied framework to assess the phenomenon of low-value physiotherapy services incorporated three domains (care effectiveness; care efficiency; patient alignment of care) and perspectives (provider; patient; society) of care.
Thirty-three articles met the inclusion criteria. Seventy-nine percent of articles focused on the appropriateness of physiotherapeutic treatments, followed by education and information (30%), the diagnostic process (15%), and goal-setting practice (12%). Study designs were predominantly cross-sectional (58%). Data sources were mainly survey instruments (67%) of which 50% were self-developed. Most studies addressed the effectiveness domain of care (73%) and the provider perspective (88%). The perspective of patient alignment was assessed by 6% of included articles. None of included articles assessed the society perspective. Four methodical approaches of included articles were rated to be transferrable to Germany.
Identified research on low-value physiotherapy care in low back pain management was widely unidimensional. Most articles focused on the effectiveness domain of care and investigated the provider perspective. Most measures were indirectly and did not monitor low-value care trends over a set period of time. Research on low-value physiotherapy care in secondary care conditions, such as Germany, was scarce.
This review has been registered on open science framework ( https://osf.io/vzq7k https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/PMF2G ).
在腰痛管理中提供低价值的物理治疗服务是一个已知但复杂的现象。因此,本范围综述旨在系统地绘制该领域现有的研究设计和工具,以便讨论当前的研究方法,并将结果置于所提到的低价值护理分类的领域和视角。最终,结果将以图表形式展示,并转移到德国医疗保健环境的条件,因为德国物理治疗的护理提供条件面临着独特的特殊性。
本综述的发展遵循 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的分析框架。在 Medline(PubMed)、Web of Science 和谷歌学术中进行了两阶段、审核后的搜索策略。纳入了所有类型的观察性研究。确定的文章需要针对预先确定的人群、概念和背景框架,并以英文或德文发表。纳入文章的出版日期不受任何限制。评估低价值物理治疗服务现象的应用框架包括三个领域(护理效果;护理效率;患者护理一致性)和护理视角(提供者;患者;社会)。
33 篇文章符合纳入标准。79%的文章关注物理治疗的适当性,其次是教育和信息(30%)、诊断过程(15%)和目标设定实践(12%)。研究设计主要为横断面(58%)。数据来源主要是调查工具(67%),其中 50%是自行开发的。大多数研究关注护理的效果领域(73%)和提供者的视角(88%)。纳入文章的 6%评估了患者一致性的视角。纳入的文章没有一个评估社会视角。纳入文章的四种方法学方法被评为可转移到德国。
确定的腰痛管理中低价值物理治疗护理的研究广泛缺乏多维性。大多数文章关注护理的效果领域,并调查提供者的视角。大多数措施是间接的,没有在一段时间内监测低价值护理的趋势。关于德国等二级保健条件下低价值物理治疗护理的研究很少。
本综述已在开放科学框架(https://osf.io/vzq7k)上注册。