• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

叙事探究医疗保健人员的韧性以及在新冠疫情期间实施质量改进工作的可持续性。

A narrative inquiry into healthcare staff resilience and the sustainability of Quality Improvement implementation efforts during Covid-19.

机构信息

Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS Centre), University College Dublin (UCD) Centre for Interdisciplinary Research UCD School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Improvement Academy, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 24;23(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09190-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-09190-4
PMID:36823599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9949907/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent research, which explored the use of Quality Improvement (QI) methods in the Covid-19 pandemic response, found that Quality Improvement principles were utilised during the crisis management period, albeit without direct intention. Following on from this work, the aim of this paper extends that study by investigating the sustainability and resilience of not only the changes implemented by healthcare staff during Covid-19 in Ireland, but the resilience of the wellbeing of healthcare staff themselves through the various waves of Covid-19.

METHODS

To explore healthcare staffs experience of Quality Improvement and the sustainability and resilience of both Quality Improvement initiatives and healthcare staff, a qualitative design was implemented. Semi-structured interviews took place online over Zoom with 11 healthcare staff members from the Irish healthcare service in the Spring of 2022. An analysis of the narratives was conducted using thematic analysis supported by NVivo12.

RESULTS

Four key themes were evident from the data: (i) From fear to exhaustion; (ii) maintaining person-centred approaches to care; (iii) Covid-19 as a medium for change, and; (iv) staff resilience and appetite for Quality Improvement.

DISCUSSION

The results of this work identified three key learnings; (i) integrating learning into policies and practice: (ii) the role of collective leadership and devolving/sharing power; and (iii) key drivers/factors that promote sustainability of QI interventions. Despite the challenges in recruitment of research participants experienced during the pandemic, a narrative approach supported the collation of rich and nuanced insights into the experiences of healthcare staff during this time.

CONCLUSION

A growing body of literature currently exists on how healthcare staff felt during the Covid-19 pandemic. However, as the waves of Covid-19 have declined, it is vital to examine how the feelings of burnout and disillusionment will affect engagement with Quality Improvement in the future. It is also worth noting and examining the feeling of purpose and pride participants expressed from working through the Covid-19 pandemic. This study has helped to address this gap.

摘要

背景

最近的研究探索了在新冠疫情应对中使用质量改进(QI)方法的情况,发现尽管并非直接有意为之,但在危机管理期间,质量改进原则得到了应用。在此项工作的基础上,本文旨在通过调查爱尔兰医疗保健人员在新冠疫情期间实施的变革的可持续性和韧性,以及他们在应对多波新冠疫情时的整体幸福感的韧性,进一步延伸该研究。

方法

为了探索医疗保健人员在质量改进方面的经验,以及质量改进举措和医疗保健人员的可持续性和韧性,我们采用了定性设计。2022 年春季,通过在线 Zoom 与爱尔兰医疗服务部门的 11 名医疗保健人员进行了半结构化访谈。采用主题分析对叙事进行分析,并使用 NVivo12 提供支持。

结果

从数据中得出了四个关键主题:(i)从恐惧到疲惫;(ii)保持以人为本的护理方法;(iii)新冠疫情作为变革的媒介;以及(iv)员工的韧性和对质量改进的兴趣。

讨论

这项工作的结果确定了三个关键的经验教训:(i)将学习融入政策和实践中;(ii)集体领导和下放/共享权力的作用;以及(iii)促进质量改进干预措施可持续性的关键驱动因素/因素。尽管在疫情期间招募研究参与者遇到了挑战,但叙事方法支持了对医疗保健人员在此期间的经验进行深入细致的分析。

结论

目前关于医疗保健人员在新冠疫情期间的感受的文献越来越多。然而,随着新冠疫情的浪潮逐渐消退,研究人员必须检查倦怠和幻灭感将如何影响他们未来对质量改进的参与度。同样值得注意和研究的是,参与者在应对新冠疫情时所表达的使命感和自豪感。本研究有助于填补这一空白。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ab1/9951505/2280546501bb/12913_2023_9190_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ab1/9951505/2280546501bb/12913_2023_9190_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ab1/9951505/2280546501bb/12913_2023_9190_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A narrative inquiry into healthcare staff resilience and the sustainability of Quality Improvement implementation efforts during Covid-19.叙事探究医疗保健人员的韧性以及在新冠疫情期间实施质量改进工作的可持续性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 24;23(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09190-4.
2
Exploring healthcare staff narratives to understand the role of quality improvement methods in innovative practices during COVID-19.探讨医疗保健人员的叙事,以了解在 COVID-19 期间,质量改进方法在创新实践中的作用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 25;21(1):1271. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07297-0.
3
Quality improvement in a crisis: a qualitative study of experiences and lessons learned from the Irish National Ambulance Service response to the COVID-19 pandemic.危机中的质量改进:对爱尔兰国家救护服务应对 COVID-19 大流行的经验和教训的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 17;12(1):e057162. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057162.
4
'In the shower crying…but we came back in the following day and did it all again'. Distress and resilience in care home staff during the COVID-19 pandemic- A qualitative interview study.在淋浴中哭泣……但第二天我们又回来了,一切又重新开始。”在 COVID-19 大流行期间养老院工作人员的痛苦和适应能力-一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Mar 27;24(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04804-w.
5
Healthcare leaders' use of innovative solutions to ensure resilience in healthcare during the Covid-19 pandemic: a qualitative study in Norwegian nursing homes and home care services.医疗保健领导者在新冠疫情期间使用创新解决方案确保医疗保健的韧性:挪威疗养院和家庭护理服务中的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 27;21(1):878. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06923-1.
6
Quality improvement collaborative approach to COVID-19 pandemic preparedness in long-term care homes: a mixed-methods implementation study.长期护理院 COVID-19 大流行准备的质量改进协作方法:一项混合方法实施研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Apr 8;13(2):e002589. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002589.
7
Managing Through a Pandemic: A Daily Management System for COVID-19 Response and Recovery.应对疫情大流行:COVID-19 应对和恢复的日常管理系统。
J Healthc Manag. 2022;67(6):446-457. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-21-00319. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
8
Are we ready for the next pandemic? Lessons learned from healthcare professionals' perspectives during the COVID-19 pandemic.我们是否为下一次大流行做好准备?从 COVID-19 大流行期间医护人员的角度吸取的教训。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 30;11:1048283. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1048283. eCollection 2023.
9
Psychosocial work environment stressors for school staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: Barriers and facilitators for supporting wellbeing.新冠疫情期间学校教职员工的心理社会工作环境压力源:支持幸福感的障碍和促进因素。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 13;11:1096240. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1096240. eCollection 2023.
10
What Have We Learnt About the Sourcing of Personal Protective Equipment During Pandemics? Leadership and Management in Healthcare Supply Chain Management: A Scoping Review.我们从大流行期间个人防护设备的采购中学到了什么?医疗供应链管理中的领导力和管理:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 9;9:765501. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.765501. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Time for a New Norm: Experiences of 'Being Informed' and 'Having Choice' for Prenatal Screening for Chromosomal Conditions: A Qualitative Study.迎接新常态:染色体疾病产前筛查中“获得信息”与“拥有选择权”的体验:一项定性研究
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70292. doi: 10.1111/hex.70292.
2
Hardship, coping, and joy: ACPs' experiences of working through the COVID-19 pandemic.艰难、应对与喜悦:住院医师在应对新冠疫情期间的工作经历。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2025 Dec;20(1):2495382. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2025.2495382. Epub 2025 May 1.
3
The Impact of Implementing Virtual Diabetes Group Visits on Staff and Provider Wellbeing, Job Satisfaction, and Burnout: A Mixed Methods Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
The problem with … using stories as a source of evidence and learning.……将故事作为证据和学习来源的问题。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Mar;31(3):234-237. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014221. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
2
'I was prepared to become infected as a frontline medical staff': A survey of Australian emergency department staff experiences during COVID-19.“作为一线医护人员,我已做好被感染的准备”:一项针对澳大利亚急诊医护人员在新冠疫情期间经历的调查。
Emerg Med Australas. 2022 Aug;34(4):569-577. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13943. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
3
Exploring healthcare staff narratives to understand the role of quality improvement methods in innovative practices during COVID-19.
实施虚拟糖尿病小组访视对员工和提供者的健康、工作满意度和倦怠的影响:混合方法分析。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e14238. doi: 10.1111/jep.14238.
探讨医疗保健人员的叙事,以了解在 COVID-19 期间,质量改进方法在创新实践中的作用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 25;21(1):1271. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07297-0.
4
A retrospective cohort study of outcomes in hospitalised COVID-19 patients during the first pandemic wave in Ireland.爱尔兰第一波大流行期间住院 COVID-19 患者结局的回顾性队列研究。
Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Oct;191(5):1973-1983. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02753-6. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
5
"If I die, they do not care": U.K. National Health Service staff experiences of betrayal-based moral injury during COVID-19.“倘若我死了,他们毫不在意”:英国国民医疗服务体系工作人员在新冠疫情期间基于背叛的道德伤害经历
Psychol Trauma. 2022 Mar;14(3):516-521. doi: 10.1037/tra0001134. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
6
Experiences of frontline healthcare workers and their views about support during COVID-19 and previous pandemics: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.一线医护人员在 COVID-19 疫情及以往大流行期间的经历及其对支持的看法:系统评价和定性荟萃分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 6;21(1):923. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06917-z.
7
Determining the skills needed by frontline NHS staff to deliver quality improvement: findings from six case studies.确定一线 NHS 员工提供质量改进所需的技能:来自六个案例研究的结果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Jun;31(6):450-461. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013065. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
8
Guidance for Health Care Leaders During the Recovery Stage of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Consensus Statement.COVID-19 大流行恢复期医疗保健领导者指南:共识声明。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2120295. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20295.
9
Healthcare worker resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: An integrative review.医护人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间的韧性:综合评价。
J Nurs Manag. 2021 Nov;29(8):2329-2342. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13395. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
10
Critical care work during COVID-19: a qualitative study of staff experiences in the UK.新冠疫情期间的重症监护工作:英国工作人员经验的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 18;11(5):e048124. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048124.