Miller David A, Duncan Lael, Termini Lindsey, Prebil Lee Ann, Witt David, McCurdy Stephen A
The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, California, USA.
Marin County Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Public Health, Marin, California, USA.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 21;10(2):ofad048. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad048. eCollection 2023 Feb.
Mitigation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreaks in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) is facilitated by rapid identification and isolation of infectious individuals to interrupt viral transmission. Immunochromatographic (IC) tests, or rapid antigen tests, have high sensitivity and specificity during the contagious period for COVID-19. Mathematical modeling predicts frequent IC surveillance will be more efficient than polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based strategies, especially during community surges when reporting of PCR results can be delayed. However, there are few published field studies evaluating IC testing strategies in this long-term care setting.
In fall and winter of 2020, the Marin Health and Human Services Department implemented thrice-weekly IC mass testing by nonlaboratory workers in outbreaks that occurred in 2 LTCFs, in addition to then-standard semiweekly PCR testing. The IC test performance was characterized using same-day PCR specimens as reference standard. Cumulative incidence and duration of transmission for the 2 IC intervention facility outbreaks were compared with 6 reference LTCFs that used weekly to semiweekly PCR alone during an outbreak response.
Of 123 same-day test pairs, IC test sensitivity and specificity were 75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48%-93%) and 100% (95% CI, 97%-100%), respectively. The median duration of outbreak transmission was 19.5 days in the 2 intervention sites and 28 days in the reference facilities ( = .40). Cumulative incidence for the outbreaks among LTCF residents was 41% in the intervention facilities versus 52% in the reference facilities ( = .04, Fisher 2-sided exact).
Thrice-weekly mass IC testing as used by nonlaboratory personnel can be highly practical and effective for COVID-19 outbreak mitigation in the LTCF setting.
通过快速识别和隔离感染者以中断病毒传播,有助于减轻长期护理机构(LTCF)中2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的暴发。免疫层析(IC)检测,即快速抗原检测,在COVID-19的传染期具有较高的敏感性和特异性。数学模型预测,频繁的IC监测将比基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的策略更有效,尤其是在社区疫情激增期间,此时PCR结果的报告可能会延迟。然而,很少有已发表的实地研究评估在这种长期护理环境中的IC检测策略。
2020年秋冬,马林县卫生与公众服务部除了进行当时标准的每周两次PCR检测外,还在2家LTCF发生的疫情中,由非实验室工作人员每周进行三次IC大规模检测。以同日PCR标本作为参考标准,对IC检测性能进行表征。将2个IC干预设施疫情的累积发病率和传播持续时间与6个在疫情应对期间仅使用每周至每两周一次PCR的参考LTCF进行比较。
在123对同日检测中,IC检测的敏感性和特异性分别为75%(95%置信区间[CI],48%-93%)和100%(95%CI,97%-100%)。2个干预地点疫情传播的中位持续时间为19.5天,参考设施为28天(P = 0.40)。LTCF居民中疫情的累积发病率在干预设施中为41%,在参考设施中为52%(P = 0.04,Fisher双侧精确检验)。
非实验室人员每周进行三次的IC大规模检测对于减轻LTCF环境中的COVID-19疫情可能非常实用且有效。