• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能体验预示着对人类的认同。

AI Experience Predicts Identification with Humankind.

作者信息

Wang Congyu, Peng Kaiping

机构信息

College of Investigation, People's Public Security University of China, Beijing 100038, China.

School of Social Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jan 21;13(2):89. doi: 10.3390/bs13020089.

DOI:10.3390/bs13020089
PMID:36829318
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9952729/
Abstract

Artificial intelligence is becoming a potential outgroup of humans, which, according to social identity theory, may make humanity more salient. To explore how identification with humankind correlates to being exposed to artificial intelligence, we developed an AI Experience Questionnaire to measure this relationship and demonstrated that AI experience positively predicted human identity (Study 1a, = 806). This correlation held when controlling for AI threats, educational level, international mobility experience, gender, and age (Study 2, = 981, = 27.55 ± 6.74; 448 males, 533 females). Study 1a also demonstrated that AI awareness-consisting of perceived anthropomorphism and perceived proximity-mediated the relationship between AI experience and human identity. This mediation model was replicated half a year later (Study 1b, = 886). Moreover, a moderation analysis demonstrated that for both Easterners and Westerners, the correlation between AI experience and human identity was significantly positive; however, Western culture amplified the correlation (Study 3; = 177, = 32.35 ± 10.99; 90 Easterners, 87 Westerners). To conclude, persons with more AI experience may be more inclined to perceive AI as an outgroup of humans, and therefore AI experience positively predicts identification with humankind.

摘要

人工智能正成为人类潜在的外群体,根据社会认同理论,这可能会使人类身份更加凸显。为了探究对人类的认同与接触人工智能之间的关联,我们编制了一份人工智能体验问卷来衡量这种关系,并证明人工智能体验能正向预测人类身份认同(研究1a,N = 806)。在控制了人工智能威胁、教育水平、国际流动经历、性别和年龄后,这种相关性依然成立(研究2,N = 981,M = 27.55 ± 6.74;男性448名,女性533名)。研究1a还表明,由感知拟人化和感知亲近感构成的人工智能意识在人工智能体验与人类身份认同之间起中介作用。半年后重复了这一中介模型(研究1b,N = 886)。此外,一项调节分析表明,对于东方人和西方人来说,人工智能体验与人类身份认同之间的相关性均显著为正;然而,西方文化增强了这种相关性(研究3;N = 177,M = 32.35 ± 10.99;东方人90名,西方人87名)。总之,拥有更多人工智能体验的人可能更倾向于将人工智能视为人类的外群体,因此人工智能体验能正向预测对人类的认同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b067/9952729/2b27c281c300/behavsci-13-00089-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b067/9952729/378e56a66240/behavsci-13-00089-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b067/9952729/3ec64bd0ab71/behavsci-13-00089-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b067/9952729/2b27c281c300/behavsci-13-00089-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b067/9952729/378e56a66240/behavsci-13-00089-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b067/9952729/3ec64bd0ab71/behavsci-13-00089-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b067/9952729/2b27c281c300/behavsci-13-00089-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
AI Experience Predicts Identification with Humankind.人工智能体验预示着对人类的认同。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jan 21;13(2):89. doi: 10.3390/bs13020089.
2
Identity Threats as a Reason for Resistance to Artificial Intelligence: Survey Study With Medical Students and Professionals.身份威胁作为抵制人工智能的一个原因:对医学生和专业人员的调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 23;6(3):e28750. doi: 10.2196/28750.
3
Boundary crossing: an experimental study of individual perceptions toward AIGC.跨界:关于个体对人工智能生成内容(AIGC)认知的实验研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 20;14:1185880. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1185880. eCollection 2023.
4
Effects of Gender and Relationship Type on the Response to Artificial Intelligence.性别和关系类型对人工智能反应的影响。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019 Apr;22(4):249-253. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2018.0581. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
5
Psychosocial Factors Affecting Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Health Care in China: Cross-Sectional Study.影响中国医疗保健领域人工智能采用的社会心理因素:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 17;21(10):e14316. doi: 10.2196/14316.
6
Did Artificial Intelligence Invade Humans? The Study on the Mechanism of Patients' Willingness to Accept Artificial Intelligence Medical Care: From the Perspective of Intergroup Threat Theory.人工智能入侵人类了吗?患者接受人工智能医疗意愿的机制研究:基于群体间威胁理论的视角
Front Psychol. 2022 May 3;13:866124. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.866124. eCollection 2022.
7
Artificial Intelligence Decision-Making Transparency and Employees' Trust: The Parallel Multiple Mediating Effect of Effectiveness and Discomfort.人工智能决策透明度与员工信任:有效性与不适感的平行多重中介效应
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Apr 27;12(5):127. doi: 10.3390/bs12050127.
8
Customer experiences in the age of artificial intelligence.人工智能时代的客户体验。
Comput Human Behav. 2021 Jan;114:106548. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106548. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
9
The Drivers of Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence-Powered Care Pathways Among Medical Professionals: Web-Based Survey Study.医疗专业人员对人工智能驱动的护理路径的接受度驱动因素:基于网络的调查研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):e33368. doi: 10.2196/33368.
10
Perceptions of the Targets and Sources of COVID-19 Threat are Structured by Group Memberships and Responses are Influenced by Identification with Humankind.对新冠病毒威胁的目标和来源的认知由群体成员身份构建,而应对措施则受到对人类认同的影响。
Psychol Belg. 2022 Mar 16;62(1):75-88. doi: 10.5334/pb.1043. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
You Are Not Alone: A Serial Mediation of Social Attraction, Privacy Concerns, and Satisfaction in Voice AI Use.你并不孤单:社交吸引力、隐私担忧与语音人工智能使用满意度的系列中介作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 May 20;13(5):431. doi: 10.3390/bs13050431.

本文引用的文献

1
Multiple Identifications of Employees in an Organization: Salience and Relationships of Foci and Dimensions.组织中员工的多重身份识别:焦点与维度的显著性及关系
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Jun 7;12(6):182. doi: 10.3390/bs12060182.
2
From Globalization to Regionalization: The United States, China, and the Post-Covid-19 World Economic Order.从全球化到区域化:美国、中国与后新冠疫情时代的世界经济秩序
J Chin Polit Sci. 2021;26(1):69-87. doi: 10.1007/s11366-020-09706-3. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
3
Concerns About Automation and Negative Sentiment Toward Immigration.
对自动化的担忧和对移民的负面情绪。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Aug;31(8):987-1000. doi: 10.1177/0956797620929977. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
4
Could a rising robot workforce make humans less prejudiced?机器人劳动力的崛起会让人类减少偏见吗?
Am Psychol. 2020 Oct;75(7):969-982. doi: 10.1037/amp0000582. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
5
Oh, the places you'll go! How international mobility challenges identity development in adolescence.哦,你会去的地方!国际流动如何挑战青少年的身份发展。
Dev Psychol. 2018 Nov;54(11):2152-2165. doi: 10.1037/dev0000595. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
6
The Neural Basis of Independence Versus Interdependence Orientations: A Voxel-Based Morphometric Analysis of Brain Volume.独立性与相互依存性取向的神经基础:基于体素的脑容量形态计量分析。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Apr;28(4):519-529. doi: 10.1177/0956797616689079. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
7
Sample Size in Factor Analysis: The Role of Model Error.因子分析中的样本量:模型误差的作用。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2001 Oct 1;36(4):611-37. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3604_06.
8
Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants.细心的土耳其工人:与样本库参与者相比,亚马逊土耳其机器人平台的参与者在在线注意力测试中的表现更好。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):400-7. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z.
9
Feeling like a group after a natural disaster: Common ingroup identity and relations with outgroup victims among majority and minority young children.自然灾害后产生的群体认同感:多数族裔和少数族裔儿童的共同内群体认同与对外群体受害者的关系。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2015 Sep;54(3):519-38. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12091. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
10
All humanity is my ingroup: a measure and studies of identification with all humanity.全人类是我的内群体:对认同全人类的衡量和研究。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Nov;103(5):830-53. doi: 10.1037/a0028724. Epub 2012 Jun 18.