• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能入侵人类了吗?患者接受人工智能医疗意愿的机制研究:基于群体间威胁理论的视角

Did Artificial Intelligence Invade Humans? The Study on the Mechanism of Patients' Willingness to Accept Artificial Intelligence Medical Care: From the Perspective of Intergroup Threat Theory.

作者信息

Zhou Yuwei, Shi Yichuan, Lu Wei, Wan Fang

机构信息

Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Fudan University Sports Medicine Institute, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 May 3;13:866124. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.866124. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.866124
PMID:35592172
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9112914/
Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become one of the core driving forces for the future development of the medical industry, but patients are skeptical about the use of AI in medical care. Based on the intergroup threat theory (ITT), this study verified that patients would regard AI as an external group, triggering the perceived threat of the external group, which results in avoidance behaviors in the treatment (experiment 1: = 446) and diagnosis (experiment 2: = 330) scenarios. The results show that despite AI can provide expert-level accuracy in medical care, patients are still more likely to rely on human doctors and experience more negative emotions as AI is more involved in medical care (experiment 1). Furthermore, patients pay more attention to threats at the individual level related to themselves, such as realistic threats related to privacy issues and symbolic threats related to the neglect of personal characteristics. In contrast, realistic threats and symbolic threats at the group level had less effect on patients in the medical scenario (experiment 2).

摘要

人工智能(AI)已成为医疗行业未来发展的核心驱动力之一,但患者对AI在医疗护理中的应用持怀疑态度。基于群体间威胁理论(ITT),本研究证实,患者会将AI视为外部群体,引发对外群体的感知威胁,从而导致在治疗场景(实验1:n = 446)和诊断场景(实验2:n = 330)中的回避行为。结果表明,尽管AI在医疗护理中能提供专家级的准确性,但随着AI更多地参与医疗护理,患者仍然更倾向于依赖人类医生,并体验到更多负面情绪(实验1)。此外,患者更关注与自身相关的个体层面的威胁,例如与隐私问题相关的现实威胁以及与个人特征被忽视相关的象征性威胁。相比之下,群体层面上的现实威胁和象征性威胁对医疗场景中的患者影响较小(实验2)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b57/9112914/857b7cef6fd4/fpsyg-13-866124-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b57/9112914/8d488b5fe066/fpsyg-13-866124-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b57/9112914/5432cc6abfb4/fpsyg-13-866124-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b57/9112914/857b7cef6fd4/fpsyg-13-866124-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b57/9112914/8d488b5fe066/fpsyg-13-866124-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b57/9112914/5432cc6abfb4/fpsyg-13-866124-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b57/9112914/857b7cef6fd4/fpsyg-13-866124-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Did Artificial Intelligence Invade Humans? The Study on the Mechanism of Patients' Willingness to Accept Artificial Intelligence Medical Care: From the Perspective of Intergroup Threat Theory.人工智能入侵人类了吗?患者接受人工智能医疗意愿的机制研究:基于群体间威胁理论的视角
Front Psychol. 2022 May 3;13:866124. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.866124. eCollection 2022.
2
Identity Threats as a Reason for Resistance to Artificial Intelligence: Survey Study With Medical Students and Professionals.身份威胁作为抵制人工智能的一个原因:对医学生和专业人员的调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 23;6(3):e28750. doi: 10.2196/28750.
3
Testing Intergroup Threat Theory: Realistic and Symbolic Threats, Religiosity and Gender as Predictors of Prejudice.检验群体间威胁理论:现实威胁与象征性威胁、宗教信仰及性别作为偏见的预测因素
Eur J Psychol. 2018 Jun 19;14(2):464-484. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v14i2.1483. eCollection 2018 Jun.
4
Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Care: Content Analysis of Social Media.公众对医疗人工智能的看法:社交媒体的内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 13;22(7):e16649. doi: 10.2196/16649.
5
Exploring Factors of the Willingness to Accept AI-Assisted Learning Environments: An Empirical Investigation Based on the UTAUT Model and Perceived Risk Theory.探索接受人工智能辅助学习环境意愿的影响因素:基于UTAUT模型和感知风险理论的实证研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 24;13:870777. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.870777. eCollection 2022.
6
Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of Threats of Artificial Intelligence Scale (TAI) in Chinese adults.中文版人工智能威胁量表(TAI)在中国成年人中的效度和信度
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2023 Feb 21;36(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41155-023-00247-1.
7
Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: a meta-analytic review.群体间威胁与外群体态度:一项元分析综述
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(4):336-53. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4.
8
A survey on the future of radiology among radiologists, medical students and surgeons: Students and surgeons tend to be more skeptical about artificial intelligence and radiologists may fear that other disciplines take over.一项针对放射科医生、医学生和外科医生的放射学未来的调查:学生和外科医生往往对人工智能持更怀疑的态度,而放射科医生可能担心其他学科会接管。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Dec;121:108742. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108742. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
9
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICAL PRACTICE: REGULATIVE ISSUES AND PERSPECTIVES.人工智能在医学实践中的应用:监管问题与展望。
Wiad Lek. 2020;73(12 cz 2):2722-2727.
10
Patients' Perceptions Toward Human-Artificial Intelligence Interaction in Health Care: Experimental Study.患者对医疗保健中人机交互的看法:实验研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 25;23(11):e25856. doi: 10.2196/25856.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring doctors' perspectives on precision medicine and AI in colorectal cancer: opportunities and challenges for the doctor-patient relationship.探索医生对结直肠癌精准医学和人工智能的看法:医患关系面临的机遇与挑战
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03134-0.
2
Large Language Models Demonstrate Distinct Personality Profiles.大语言模型展现出独特的个性特征。
Cureus. 2025 May 23;17(5):e84706. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84706. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Acceptance of AI in Health Care for Short- and Long-Term Treatments: Pilot Development Study of an Integrated Theoretical Model.

本文引用的文献

1
Automated Identification and Measurement Extraction of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions from Free-Text Radiology Reports Using Natural Language Processing.使用自然语言处理技术从自由文本放射学报告中自动识别和测量胰腺囊性病变
Radiol Artif Intell. 2021 Dec 22;4(2):e210092. doi: 10.1148/ryai.210092. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Artificial Intelligence for Skin Cancer Detection: Scoping Review.人工智能在皮肤癌检测中的应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 24;23(11):e22934. doi: 10.2196/22934.
3
Do personal health concerns and trust in healthcare providers mitigate privacy concerns? Effects on patients' intention to share personal health data on electronic health records.
人工智能在短期和长期医疗保健治疗中的接受度:综合理论模型的试点开发研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jul 18;8:e48600. doi: 10.2196/48600.
4
AI and imaging-based cancer screening: getting ready for prime time.基于人工智能和成像技术的癌症筛查:准备迎接黄金时代。
Nat Med. 2023 Dec;29(12):3002-3003. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02630-y.
个人健康问题和对医疗服务提供者的信任是否会减轻对隐私的担忧?对患者在电子健康记录中分享个人健康数据意愿的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Aug;283:114146. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114146. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
4
Artificial intelligence-enabled rapid diagnosis of patients with COVID-19.人工智能助力 COVID-19 患者快速诊断。
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1224-1228. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0931-3. Epub 2020 May 19.
5
Artificial intelligence: opportunities and implications for the health workforce.人工智能:对卫生人力的机遇和影响。
Int Health. 2020 Jul 1;12(4):241-245. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa007.
6
Psychological reactions to human versus robotic job replacement.对人类和机器人工作替代的心理反应。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Oct;3(10):1062-1069. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0670-y. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
7
Proceedings of the 3rd IPLeiria's International Health Congress : Leiria, Portugal. 6-7 May 2016.第三届IPLeiria国际健康大会会议记录:葡萄牙莱里亚。2016年5月6 - 7日。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 6;16 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):200. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1423-5.
8
Individual-level and group-level mediators of contact effects in Northern Ireland: the moderating role of social identification.北爱尔兰接触效应的个体层面和群体层面中介因素:社会认同的调节作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2007 Sep;46(Pt 3):541-56. doi: 10.1348/014466606X155150.
9
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models.用于估计简单中介模型中间接效应的SPSS和SAS程序。
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Nov;36(4):717-31. doi: 10.3758/bf03206553.
10
Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis.临床预测与机械预测:一项荟萃分析。
Psychol Assess. 2000 Mar;12(1):19-30.