• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国和西班牙高级英语学习者的隐性知识习得及潜在挑战:关于英语问题的单词监测测试

Implicit Knowledge Acquisition and Potential Challenges for Advanced Chinese and Spanish EFL Learners: A Word Monitoring Test on English Questions.

作者信息

He Qiaoling, Oltra-Massuet Isabel

机构信息

College of General Education, Sichuan International Studies University, Chongqing 400031, China.

Department of English and German Studies, Universitat Rovira I Virgili, 43002 Tarragona, Spain.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jan 24;13(2):99. doi: 10.3390/bs13020099.

DOI:10.3390/bs13020099
PMID:36829328
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9952768/
Abstract

This study aims to explore whether advanced EFL learners can acquire implicit knowledge of basic sentence structures, such as English questions. We ran a reaction-time experiment, a word monitoring test experiment to test learners' implicit knowledge by checking advanced EFL learners' grammatical sensitivity to English questions with five types of grammatical errors. The study recruited three groups of participants: native English speakers ( 12), advanced Chinese EFL learners ( 32), and advanced Spanish EFL learners ( 37). Our results revealed that advanced EFL learners had not yet attained native-equivalent implicit grammar knowledge in English questions, despite their English proficiency level. The results also indicated that the learners' different L1 languages do not impact advanced learners' overall implicit knowledge acquisition but constitute influential factors for particular morphosyntactic inflections in English question formation.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨高级英语外语学习者是否能够习得基本句子结构的隐性知识,比如英语疑问句。我们进行了一项反应时实验,即一个单词监测测试实验,通过检查高级英语外语学习者对带有五种语法错误类型的英语疑问句的语法敏感度,来测试学习者的隐性知识。该研究招募了三组参与者:以英语为母语者(12人)、中国高级英语外语学习者(32人)和西班牙高级英语外语学习者(37人)。我们的研究结果表明,尽管高级英语外语学习者具备一定的英语水平,但他们在英语疑问句方面尚未获得与以英语为母语者相当的隐性语法知识。研究结果还表明,学习者不同的第一语言不会影响高级学习者整体隐性知识的习得,但在英语疑问句形成过程中,这些不同的第一语言是特定形态句法变化的影响因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc85/9952768/845873bb911c/behavsci-13-00099-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc85/9952768/c38169020a12/behavsci-13-00099-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc85/9952768/9fcbe2524421/behavsci-13-00099-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc85/9952768/845873bb911c/behavsci-13-00099-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc85/9952768/c38169020a12/behavsci-13-00099-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc85/9952768/9fcbe2524421/behavsci-13-00099-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc85/9952768/845873bb911c/behavsci-13-00099-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Implicit Knowledge Acquisition and Potential Challenges for Advanced Chinese and Spanish EFL Learners: A Word Monitoring Test on English Questions.中国和西班牙高级英语学习者的隐性知识习得及潜在挑战:关于英语问题的单词监测测试
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jan 24;13(2):99. doi: 10.3390/bs13020099.
2
An experimental study on grammatical sensitivity and production competence in Chinese and Spanish EFL learners and its implications on EFL teaching methods.中国和西班牙英语学习者语法敏感度与产出能力的实验研究及其对英语教学方法的启示
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 21;14:1096875. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1096875. eCollection 2023.
3
Chinese EFL learners different from English natives in cataphora resolution: Evidence from eye-tracking studies.中国英语学习者在指代消解方面与以英语为母语者不同:来自眼动追踪研究的证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 23;14:1126673. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1126673. eCollection 2023.
4
Linguistic distances between native languages and Chinese influence acquisition of Chinese character, vocabulary, and grammar.母语与中文之间的语言距离会影响汉字、词汇和语法的习得。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 13;13:1083574. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1083574. eCollection 2022.
5
Text memorization: An effective strategy to improve Chinese EFL learners' argumentative writing proficiency.文本记忆:提高中国英语学习者议论文写作能力的有效策略。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 4;14:1126194. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1126194. eCollection 2023.
6
Can Learning a Foreign Language Foster Analytic Thinking?-Evidence from Chinese EFL Learners' Writings.学习外语能培养分析性思维吗?——来自中国英语学习者写作的证据。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 14;11(10):e0164448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164448. eCollection 2016.
7
Enhancing EFL Learners' Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Learning English with Emoji Feedbacks in CALL: Why and How.在计算机辅助语言学习中通过表情符号反馈增强外语学习者学习英语的自我效能感:原因与方法
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Jul 12;12(7):227. doi: 10.3390/bs12070227.
8
Motivational Factors Affecting Iranian English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Learners' Learning of English Across Differing Levels of Language Proficiency.影响不同英语水平的伊朗英语学习者学习英语的动机因素
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 12;13:869599. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.869599. eCollection 2022.
9
Computerized mediated explicit instruction and EFL learners' knowledge of speech acts: Investigating the role of EFL learners' language proficiency and perceptions.计算机辅助显性教学与外语学习者的言语行为知识:探究外语学习者语言水平和认知的作用
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 9;9(9):e19738. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19738. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Exploring the motivational states of English learning among Chinese EFL learners at tertiary-level: A perspective of Directed Motivational Currents.从导向性动机流视角探究中国高校英语学习者的英语学习动机状态
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 30;13:1041258. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041258. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Descriptive Statistics for Modern Test Score Distributions: Skewness, Kurtosis, Discreteness, and Ceiling Effects.现代测试分数分布的描述性统计:偏度、峰度、离散度和天花板效应。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2015 Jun;75(3):365-388. doi: 10.1177/0013164414548576. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
2
Who's in control? Proficiency and L1 influence on L2 processing.谁在掌控?语言熟练程度及母语对第二语言加工的影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Oct;17(10):1593-610. doi: 10.1162/089892905774597245.
3
Evaluating the relationship between explicit and implicit knowledge in a sequential reaction time task.
在序列反应时任务中评估显性知识与隐性知识之间的关系。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999 Nov;25(6):1435-51. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.25.6.1435.