• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个人主义、集体主义与分配行为:来自最后通牒博弈和独裁者博弈的证据

Individualism, Collectivism, and Allocation Behavior: Evidence from the Ultimatum Game and Dictator Game.

作者信息

Jiao Jingjing, Zhao Jun

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Feb 14;13(2):169. doi: 10.3390/bs13020169.

DOI:10.3390/bs13020169
PMID:36829398
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9951955/
Abstract

Studies have demonstrated the influence of the cultural values of individualism and collectivism on individuals' economic behavior (e.g., competition and trade). By using individualistic and collectivistic texts to prime participants' minds in a lab experiment, we investigated the impact of the cultural values of individualism and collectivism on allocation behavior in an ultimatum game (UG) and dictator game (DG). In the dictator game, we found that participants in the collectivism-priming condition reported a slightly higher mean offer than in the individualism-priming condition, and participants had an average higher acceptance rate of the proposers' offer in the collectivism-priming (vs. individualism-priming) condition in the ultimatum game. Our findings suggest that participants exhibit more altruistic allocation behavior and are more tolerant of unfair allocation behavior after being primed by the collectivistic (vs. individualistic) texts. In comparison with participants who did not undergo initiation, we also found that Chinese participants who had been influenced by collectivist values for a long time remained unaffected after the initiation of collectivism, but shifted their allocation behavior (i.e., showed decreased altruistic allocation behavior and reduced tolerance of unfair allocation behavior) when individualism was primed.

摘要

研究表明个人主义和集体主义的文化价值观对个人的经济行为(如竞争和贸易)有影响。通过在实验室实验中使用个人主义和集体主义文本启动参与者的思维,我们研究了个人主义和集体主义的文化价值观对最后通牒博弈(UG)和独裁者博弈(DG)中分配行为的影响。在独裁者博弈中,我们发现集体主义启动条件下的参与者报告的平均出价略高于个人主义启动条件下的参与者,并且在最后通牒博弈中,集体主义启动(相对于个人主义启动)条件下的参与者对提议者出价的平均接受率更高。我们的研究结果表明,在受到集体主义(相对于个人主义)文本启动后,参与者表现出更多的利他分配行为,并且对不公平分配行为更宽容。与未接受启动的参与者相比,我们还发现长期受到集体主义价值观影响的中国参与者在集体主义启动后没有受到影响,但在个人主义启动时改变了他们的分配行为(即表现出利他分配行为减少和对不公平分配行为的容忍度降低)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/9951955/3c04ec281f8d/behavsci-13-00169-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/9951955/0c00534f2855/behavsci-13-00169-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/9951955/48007a3cb3d8/behavsci-13-00169-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/9951955/77bb239b729f/behavsci-13-00169-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/9951955/3c04ec281f8d/behavsci-13-00169-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/9951955/0c00534f2855/behavsci-13-00169-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/9951955/48007a3cb3d8/behavsci-13-00169-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/9951955/77bb239b729f/behavsci-13-00169-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d390/9951955/3c04ec281f8d/behavsci-13-00169-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Individualism, Collectivism, and Allocation Behavior: Evidence from the Ultimatum Game and Dictator Game.个人主义、集体主义与分配行为:来自最后通牒博弈和独裁者博弈的证据
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Feb 14;13(2):169. doi: 10.3390/bs13020169.
2
Influences of a Luck Game on Offers in Ultimatum and Dictator Games: Is There a Mediation of Emotions?运气游戏对最后通牒博弈和独裁者博弈中报价的影响:是否存在情感中介作用?
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 3;11:13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00013. eCollection 2020.
3
Generosity in dictator game and social value orientation predicted the type of costly punishment in ultimatum game.在独裁者博弈中的慷慨程度和社会价值取向预测了最后通牒博弈中昂贵惩罚的类型。
Psych J. 2021 Aug;10(4):625-634. doi: 10.1002/pchj.432. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
4
Is it all about the self? The effect of self-control depletion on ultimatum game proposers.这都是关于自我的吗?自我控制消耗对最后通牒游戏提议者的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 13;7:240. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00240. eCollection 2013.
5
Proportion offered in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games decreases with amount and social distance.独裁者博弈和最后通牒博弈中给出的比例会随着金额和社会距离的增加而降低。
Behav Processes. 2015 Jun;115:149-55. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
6
Social Value Orientation and Endorsement of Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism: An Exploratory Study Comparing Individuals From North America and South Korea.社会价值取向与对水平和垂直个人主义及集体主义的认同:一项比较北美和韩国个体的探索性研究。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 20;9:2262. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02262. eCollection 2018.
7
Is Individualism Suicidogenic? Findings From a Multinational Study of Young Adults From 12 Countries.个人主义会引发自杀行为吗?来自一项对12个国家年轻人的跨国研究的发现。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 3;11:259. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00259. eCollection 2020.
8
Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism.文化会影响我们的思维内容和方式吗?启动个人主义和集体主义的影响。
Psychol Bull. 2008 Mar;134(2):311-42. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.311.
9
The effect of delay and social distance in the dictator and ultimatum games.延迟和社会距离对独裁者和最后通牒游戏的影响。
Behav Processes. 2021 Dec;193:104513. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2021.104513. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
10
Rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity.拒绝最后通牒游戏中的不公平提议并不能证明强烈的互惠性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 11;109(50):20364-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212126109. Epub 2012 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Cultural Adaptation of Evidence-Based HIV Prevention Interventions for African Immigrant Women: Exploratory Pilot Mixed-Methods Study.评估针对非洲移民妇女的循证艾滋病毒预防干预措施的文化适应性:探索性试点混合方法研究。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1007/s10903-025-01762-2.
2
Parental Burnout: A Progressive Condition Potentially Compromising Family Well-Being-A Narrative Review.父母倦怠:一种可能损害家庭幸福的渐进性状况——叙事综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 4;13(13):1603. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131603.
3
Helping Across Boundaries: Collectivism and Hierarchy in the Ultra-Orthodox Context.

本文引用的文献

1
Large-scale psychological differences within China explained by rice versus wheat agriculture.中国内部存在大规模的心理差异,可以用水稻和小麦农业来解释。
Science. 2014 May 9;344(6184):603-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1246850.
2
In others' shoes: do individual differences in empathy and theory of mind shape social preferences?设身处地:共情和心理理论的个体差异会塑造社会偏好吗?
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 17;9(4):e92844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092844. eCollection 2014.
3
Family income affects children's altruistic behavior in the dictator game.
跨越边界的帮助:极端正统背景下的集体主义与等级制度
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 13;15(4):520. doi: 10.3390/bs15040520.
4
A Complex Presentation of Anorexia Nervosa and Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy in a Patient of East Asian Descent.一名东亚裔患者的神经性厌食症和应激性心肌病的复杂表现
Cureus. 2025 Feb 18;17(2):e79226. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79226. eCollection 2025 Feb.
家庭收入会影响儿童在独裁者游戏中的利他行为。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e80419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080419. eCollection 2013.
4
Psychological traces of China's socio-economic reforms in the ultimatum and dictator games.中国社会经济改革在最后通牒和独裁者博弈中的心理痕迹。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 14;8(8):e70769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070769. eCollection 2013.
5
Rise and fall of competitiveness in individualistic and collectivistic societies.个人主义和集体主义社会中竞争力的兴衰。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 4;110(23):9305-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300431110. Epub 2013 May 21.
6
Rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity.拒绝最后通牒游戏中的不公平提议并不能证明强烈的互惠性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 11;109(50):20364-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212126109. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
7
Culture sometimes matters: intra-cultural variation in pro-social behavior among Tsimane Amerindians.文化有时很重要:齐曼内美洲印第安人亲社会行为中的文化内差异。
J Econ Behav Organ. 2008;67(3-4):587-607. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2007.09.005.
8
Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism.文化会影响我们的思维内容和方式吗?启动个人主义和集体主义的影响。
Psychol Bull. 2008 Mar;134(2):311-42. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.311.
9
Costly punishment across human societies.人类社会中的高额惩罚。
Science. 2006 Jun 23;312(5781):1767-70. doi: 10.1126/science.1127333.
10
What is altruism?什么是利他主义?
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Mar;19(3):135-40. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.004.