• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于空间观测点集的主动脉夹层支架快速形态测量方法

Rapid Morphological Measurement Method of Aortic Dissection Stent Based on Spatial Observation Point Set.

作者信息

Bai Mateng, Li Da, Xu Kaiyao, Ouyang Shuyu, Yuan Ding, Zheng Tinghui

机构信息

Department of Applied Mechanics, Sichuan University, No. 24 South Section 1, Chengdu 610065, China.

Yibin Institute of Industrial Technology, Sichuan University Yibin Park, Yibin 644600, China.

出版信息

Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Jan 20;10(2):139. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10020139.

DOI:10.3390/bioengineering10020139
PMID:36829632
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9951888/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Post-operative stent morphology of aortic dissection patients is important for performing clinical diagnosis and prognostic assessment. However, stent morphologies still need to be manually measured, which is a process prone to errors, high time consumption and difficulty in exploiting inter-data associations. Herein, we propose a method based on the stepwise combination of basic, non-divisible data sets to quickly obtain morphological parameters with high accuracy.

METHODS

We performed the 3D reconstruction of 109 post-operative follow-up CT image data from 26 patients using mimics software. By extracting the spatial locations of the basic morphological observation points on the stent, we defined a basic and non-reducible set of observation points. Further, we implemented a fully automatic stent segmentation and an observation point extraction algorithm. We analyzed the stability and accuracy of the algorithms on a test set containing 8 cases and 408 points. Based on this dataset, we calculated three morphological parameters of different complexity for the different spatial structural features exhibited by the stent. Finally, we compared the two measurement schemes in four aspects: data variability, data stability, statistical process complexity and algorithmic error.

RESULTS

The statistical results of the two methods on two low-complexity morphological parameters (spatial position of stent end and vascular stent end-slip volume) show good agreement ( = 26, , < 0.001, = 0.992, = 0.988). The statistics of the proposed method for the morphological parameters of medium complexity (proximal support ring feature diameter and distal support ring feature diameter) avoid the errors caused by manual extraction, and the magnitude of this correction to the traditional method does not exceed 4 mm with an average correction of 1.38 mm. Meanwhile, our proposed automatic observation point extraction method has only 2.2% error rate on the test set, and the average spatial distance from the manually marked observation points is 0.73 mm. Thus, the proposed method is able to rapidly and accurately measure the stent circumferential deflection angle, which is highly complex and cannot be measured using traditional methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed method can significantly reduce the statistical observation time and information processing cost compared to the traditional morphological observation methods. Moreover, when new morphological parameters are required, one can quickly and accurately obtain the target parameters by new "combinatorial functions." Iterative modification of the data set itself is avoided.

摘要

目的

主动脉夹层患者术后支架形态对于临床诊断和预后评估至关重要。然而,支架形态仍需手动测量,这一过程容易出错、耗时较长且难以挖掘数据间的关联。在此,我们提出一种基于基本的、不可分割数据集逐步组合的方法,以快速高精度地获取形态学参数。

方法

我们使用mimics软件对26例患者的109份术后随访CT图像数据进行三维重建。通过提取支架上基本形态观察点的空间位置,我们定义了一组基本且不可约的观察点。此外,我们实现了全自动的支架分割和观察点提取算法。我们在一个包含8个病例和408个点的测试集上分析了算法的稳定性和准确性。基于该数据集,我们针对支架呈现的不同空间结构特征计算了三种不同复杂度的形态学参数。最后,我们从数据变异性、数据稳定性、统计过程复杂度和算法误差四个方面比较了两种测量方案。

结果

两种方法对两个低复杂度形态学参数(支架末端空间位置和血管支架末端滑移体积)的统计结果显示出良好的一致性( = 26, , < 0.001, = 0.992, = 0.988)。所提方法对中等复杂度形态学参数(近端支撑环特征直径和远端支撑环特征直径)的统计避免了手动提取导致的误差,对传统方法的校正幅度不超过4毫米,平均校正值为1.38毫米。同时,我们提出的自动观察点提取方法在测试集上的错误率仅为2.2% , 与手动标记的观察点的平均空间距离为0.73毫米。因此,所提方法能够快速准确地测量支架圆周偏转角,这是高度复杂且传统方法无法测量的。

结论

与传统形态学观察方法相比,所提方法可显著减少统计观察时间和信息处理成本。此外,当需要新的形态学参数时,可以通过新的“组合函数”快速准确地获取目标参数。避免了数据集本身的迭代修改。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/996db86b9f33/bioengineering-10-00139-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/a4763394b6c2/bioengineering-10-00139-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/a41a822734d7/bioengineering-10-00139-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/5f82560fa59c/bioengineering-10-00139-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/a4acdd94b815/bioengineering-10-00139-g0A4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/76320f5a6ead/bioengineering-10-00139-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/12ae49a54069/bioengineering-10-00139-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/d1feda6800d3/bioengineering-10-00139-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/f96a3ed1678b/bioengineering-10-00139-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/3c9573069cb9/bioengineering-10-00139-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/d387cef9466d/bioengineering-10-00139-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/8bd4200879a7/bioengineering-10-00139-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/03133f2a2d01/bioengineering-10-00139-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/0398282fe330/bioengineering-10-00139-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/909f16b32aa9/bioengineering-10-00139-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/996db86b9f33/bioengineering-10-00139-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/a4763394b6c2/bioengineering-10-00139-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/a41a822734d7/bioengineering-10-00139-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/5f82560fa59c/bioengineering-10-00139-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/a4acdd94b815/bioengineering-10-00139-g0A4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/76320f5a6ead/bioengineering-10-00139-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/12ae49a54069/bioengineering-10-00139-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/d1feda6800d3/bioengineering-10-00139-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/f96a3ed1678b/bioengineering-10-00139-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/3c9573069cb9/bioengineering-10-00139-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/d387cef9466d/bioengineering-10-00139-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/8bd4200879a7/bioengineering-10-00139-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/03133f2a2d01/bioengineering-10-00139-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/0398282fe330/bioengineering-10-00139-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/909f16b32aa9/bioengineering-10-00139-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2528/9951888/996db86b9f33/bioengineering-10-00139-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Rapid Morphological Measurement Method of Aortic Dissection Stent Based on Spatial Observation Point Set.基于空间观测点集的主动脉夹层支架快速形态测量方法
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Jan 20;10(2):139. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10020139.
2
An automatic measurement system of distal femur morphological parameters using 3D slicer software.利用 3D 切片软件的股骨远端形态参数自动测量系统。
Bone. 2022 Mar;156:116300. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.116300. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
3
Coronary artery centerline extraction in cardiac CT angiography using a CNN-based orientation classifier.基于卷积神经网络的方向分类器的心脏 CT 血管造影中的冠状动脉中心线提取。
Med Image Anal. 2019 Jan;51:46-60. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Pathological lung segmentation in chest CT images based on improved random walker.基于改进随机游走算法的胸部CT图像病理性肺分割
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Mar;200:105864. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105864. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
6
A novel measurement technique for the design of fenestrated stent grafts: Comparison with three-dimensional aorta models.一种用于开窗支架型人工血管设计的新型测量技术:与三维主动脉模型的比较。
Exp Clin Cardiol. 2013 Winter;18(1):48-52.
7
3D Morphologic Findings Before and After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection.胸主动脉腔内修复术治疗 B 型主动脉夹层前后的 3D 形态学发现。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Jul;74:220-228. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.12.026. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
8
Assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms using a cone-beam CT system: an experimental phantom study and an initial clinical evaluation before and after stent-graft treatment in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm.使用锥形束CT系统评估腹主动脉瘤:一项实验性体模研究以及腹主动脉瘤患者支架移植物治疗前后的初步临床评估
J Nippon Med Sch. 2001 Dec;68(6):498-509. doi: 10.1272/jnms.68.498.
9
[Efficacy of personalized endovascular repair using two stent-grafts for patients with Stanford B aortic dissection].
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2015 Jan;43(1):39-43.
10
An automatic method for feature segmentation of human thoracic and lumbar vertebrae.一种自动分割人体胸腰椎特征的方法。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Oct;210:106360. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106360. Epub 2021 Aug 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of measurement and sizing techniques in thoracic endovascular aortic repair on outcome in acute complicated type B aortic dissections.测量和尺寸技术在胸主动脉腔内修复术治疗急性复杂型 B 型主动脉夹层中的影响。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Mar 31;34(4):628-636. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab300.
2
Finite element modeling to predict procedural success of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in type A aortic dissection.用于预测A型主动脉夹层胸主动脉腔内修复术手术成功率的有限元建模
JTCVS Tech. 2020 Oct 13;4:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.10.006. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
Morphological Features of Aortic Arch Predicting the Risk for Acute Type B Aortic Dissection.
主动脉弓形态特征预测急性 B 型主动脉夹层风险。
World J Surg. 2021 Nov;45(11):3458-3466. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06247-5. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
4
Influence of Distal Re-entry Tears on False Lumen Thrombosis After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Type B Aortic Dissection Patients: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation.胸主动脉腔内修复术治疗 B 型主动脉夹层后远端再入口撕裂对假腔血栓形成的影响:计算流体动力学模拟。
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2021 Aug;12(4):426-437. doi: 10.1007/s13239-021-00532-z. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
5
3D Morphologic Findings Before and After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection.胸主动脉腔内修复术治疗 B 型主动脉夹层前后的 3D 形态学发现。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Jul;74:220-228. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.12.026. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
6
Abdominal Applications of 4D Flow MRI.4D 流 MRI 在腹部的应用。
Rofo. 2021 Apr;193(4):388-398. doi: 10.1055/a-1271-7405. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
7
Effect of Geometric Accuracy at the Proximal Landing Zone on Simulation Results for Thoracic Endovascular Repair Patients.近端着陆区的几何精度对胸主动脉腔内修复患者模拟结果的影响。
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2020 Dec;11(6):679-688. doi: 10.1007/s13239-020-00498-4. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
8
Medical therapy versus TEVAR for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection.单纯B型主动脉夹层的药物治疗与腔内隔绝术对比
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jun;35(Suppl 2):174-178. doi: 10.1007/s12055-019-00837-8. Epub 2019 May 30.
9
Important issues regarding planning and sizing for emergent TEVAR.关于急诊 TEVAR 的规划和尺寸选择的重要问题。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2020 Dec;61(6):708-712. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.20.11571-4. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
10
A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks.图神经网络综述。
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2021 Jan;32(1):4-24. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2020.2978386. Epub 2021 Jan 4.