• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生计资本与放牧区恢复的机会成本:厄瓜多尔亚马逊地区的可持续集约化战略

Livelihood Capitals and Opportunity Cost for Grazing Areas' Restoration: A Sustainable Intensification Strategy in the Ecuadorian Amazon.

作者信息

Torres Bolier, Espinoza Ítalo, Torres Alexandra, Herrera-Feijoo Robinson, Luna Marcelo, García Antón

机构信息

Faculty of Life Sciences, Amazon State University (UEA), Pastaza 160101, Ecuador.

Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Cordoba, 14071 Cordoba, Spain.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2023 Feb 17;13(4):714. doi: 10.3390/ani13040714.

DOI:10.3390/ani13040714
PMID:36830503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9952715/
Abstract

Land use change in pastures is considered one of the leading drivers of tropical deforestation in the Ecuadorian Amazon Region (EAR). To halt and reverse this process, it is necessary to understand, among other factors, the local livelihoods, income from grazing area and the appropriate options to foster sustainable production, incorporating the land-sparing and land-sharing approach. This work was conducted using 167 household surveys along an altitudinal gradient within the buffer and transition zone of the Sumaco Biosphere Reserve (SBR) in the EAR. The results of a comparative analysis of the main capital variables (human, social, natural, financial, and physical), and the opportunity cost of grazing area assessment provides the following key findings: (a) the concepts of land sparing and land sharing should be considered as complementary local strategies, including household livelihoods and the opportunity cost of the grazing area; (b) we should encourage markets with differentiated restoration rights, based on households engaged in low grazing areas' opportunity costs, and making less impact on capitals' livelihood a key element of economic and conservation initiatives; and (c) sectoral policy implications, including moderate intensification and technological improvements to strengthen the pastureland-sparing and -sharing approach, are discussed.

摘要

牧场的土地利用变化被认为是厄瓜多尔亚马逊地区(EAR)热带森林砍伐的主要驱动因素之一。为了阻止并扭转这一进程,除其他因素外,有必要了解当地生计、放牧区收入以及促进可持续生产的适当选项,同时纳入土地节约和土地共享方法。这项工作是通过对EAR中苏马科生物圈保护区(SBR)缓冲区和过渡区内沿海拔梯度的167户家庭进行调查来开展的。对主要资本变量(人力、社会、自然、金融和物质资本)的比较分析结果以及放牧区评估的机会成本得出了以下主要结论:(a)应将土地节约和土地共享概念视为相辅相成的地方战略,包括家庭生计和放牧区的机会成本;(b)我们应鼓励建立具有差异化恢复权的市场,其基础是从事低放牧区机会成本活动的家庭,并将对资本生计影响较小作为经济和保护举措的关键要素;(c)讨论了部门政策影响,包括适度集约化和技术改进,以加强牧场土地节约和共享方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e160/9952715/6f703277bf56/animals-13-00714-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e160/9952715/d5c1e5bb483e/animals-13-00714-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e160/9952715/41c0f6dcce64/animals-13-00714-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e160/9952715/8b30aa00304c/animals-13-00714-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e160/9952715/6f703277bf56/animals-13-00714-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e160/9952715/d5c1e5bb483e/animals-13-00714-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e160/9952715/41c0f6dcce64/animals-13-00714-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e160/9952715/8b30aa00304c/animals-13-00714-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e160/9952715/6f703277bf56/animals-13-00714-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Livelihood Capitals and Opportunity Cost for Grazing Areas' Restoration: A Sustainable Intensification Strategy in the Ecuadorian Amazon.生计资本与放牧区恢复的机会成本:厄瓜多尔亚马逊地区的可持续集约化战略
Animals (Basel). 2023 Feb 17;13(4):714. doi: 10.3390/ani13040714.
2
Sustainable Cattle Ranching in Practice: Moving from Theory to Planning in Colombia's Livestock Sector.实践中的可持续养牛业:哥伦比亚畜牧业从理论到规划的转变
Environ Manage. 2017 Aug;60(2):176-184. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0902-8. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
3
Household Groups' Land Use Decisions Investigation Based on Perspective of Livelihood Heterogeneity in Sichuan Province, China.基于生计异质性视角的四川省农户土地利用决策研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 2;19(15):9485. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159485.
4
The role of social capital in shaping livelihood for rural Vietnamese households.社会资本在塑造越南农村家庭生计中的作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 14;18(12):e0295292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295292. eCollection 2023.
5
Navigating the complexities of the forest land sharing sparing logging dilemma: analytical insights through the governance theory of social-ecological systems dynamics.在森林土地共享与采伐权衡难题中寻求出路:通过社会-生态系统治理理论的动态分析。
PeerJ. 2024 Jan 29;12:e16809. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16809. eCollection 2024.
6
Local Fractal Connections to Characterize the Spatial Processes of Deforestation in the Ecuadorian Amazon.利用局部分形连接来表征厄瓜多尔亚马逊地区森林砍伐的空间过程
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Jun 14;23(6):748. doi: 10.3390/e23060748.
7
Collective influence of household and community capitals on agricultural employment as a measure of rural poverty in the Mahanadi Delta, India.印度马哈纳迪三角洲以农业就业为衡量标准的农村贫困的家庭和社区资本的综合影响。
Ambio. 2020 Jan;49(1):281-298. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01150-9. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
8
Livelihood Diversification and Residents' Welfare: Evidence from Maasai Mara National Reserve.生计多样化与居民福利:来自马赛马拉国家保护区的证据
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 21;20(5):3859. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053859.
9
Wealth, household heterogeneity and livelihood diversification of Fulani pastoralists in the Kachia Grazing Reserve, northern Nigeria, during a period of social transition.尼日利亚北部卡奇亚放牧保护区富拉尼牧民在社会转型时期的财富、家庭异质性与生计多样化
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 3;12(3):e0172866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172866. eCollection 2017.
10
Stability and Change within Indigenous Land Use in the Ecuadorian Amazon.厄瓜多尔亚马逊地区本土土地利用的稳定性与变化
Glob Environ Change. 2020 Jul;63. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102116. Epub 2020 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Botanical Collection Patterns and Conservation Categories of the Most Traded Timber Species from the Ecuadorian Amazon: The Role of Protected Areas.厄瓜多尔亚马逊地区最具贸易价值木材物种的植物采集模式与保护类别:保护区的作用
Plants (Basel). 2023 Sep 20;12(18):3327. doi: 10.3390/plants12183327.

本文引用的文献

1
Climate change responses benefit from a global food system approach.应对气候变化受益于全球粮食系统方法。
Nat Food. 2020 Feb;1(2):94-97. doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-0031-z.
2
Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions.食物系统产生的温室气体排放量占全球人为温室气体排放总量的三分之一。
Nat Food. 2021 Mar;2(3):198-209. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
3
Land sharing complements land sparing in the conservation of disturbance-dependent species.土地共享在保护依赖干扰的物种方面可以与土地保护相辅相成。
Ambio. 2023 Mar;52(3):571-584. doi: 10.1007/s13280-022-01820-1. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
4
Disentangling the numbers behind agriculture-driven tropical deforestation.厘清农业驱动的热带森林砍伐背后的数字。
Science. 2022 Sep 9;377(6611):eabm9267. doi: 10.1126/science.abm9267.
5
Roadmap for achieving net-zero emissions in global food systems by 2050.2050 年实现全球粮食系统净零排放的路线图。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 5;12(1):15064. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18601-1.
6
Ancient grasslands guide ambitious goals in grassland restoration.古代草原为草原恢复的雄心勃勃目标提供指导。
Science. 2022 Aug 5;377(6606):594-598. doi: 10.1126/science.abo4605. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
7
Rates and drivers of aboveground carbon accumulation in global monoculture plantation forests.全球人工纯林地上生物量碳积累的速率和驱动因素。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jul 28;13(1):4206. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31380-7.
8
Opinionated Views on Grassland Restoration Programs on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.关于青藏高原草原恢复项目的己见
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Apr 26;13:861200. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.861200. eCollection 2022.
9
Full adoption of the most effective strategies to mitigate methane emissions by ruminants can help meet the 1.5 °C target by 2030 but not 2050.全面采用最有效的缓解反刍动物甲烷排放策略,可以帮助在 2030 年而不是 2050 年实现 1.5°C 的目标。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 May 17;119(20):e2111294119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2111294119. Epub 2022 May 10.
10
Cooperation between specialized livestock and crop farms can reduce environmental footprints and increase net profits in livestock production.专业化的畜牧场和农作物农场之间的合作可以减少畜牧业生产对环境的影响,并提高净收益。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan 15;302(Pt A):113960. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113960. Epub 2021 Oct 23.