Pavlinac Dodig Ivana, Qazzafi Aisha, Lusic Kalcina Linda, Demirovic Sijana, Pecotic Renata, Valic Maja, Dogas Zoran
Department of Neuroscience and Split Sleep Medicine Center, University of Split School of Medicine, 21000 Split, Croatia.
Department of Neuroscience, University of Split School of Medicine, 21000 Split, Croatia.
Brain Sci. 2023 Jan 22;13(2):185. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13020185.
We aimed to investigate the associations between intelligence quotient test scores obtained using the Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (APM) and psychomotor testing using the Complex Reactionmeter Drenovac (CRD) test battery, while taking into account previous theoretical approaches recognizing intelligent behavior as the cumulative result of a general biological speed factor reflected in the reaction time for perceptual detections and motor decisions. A total of 224 medical students at the University of Split School of Medicine were recruited. Their IQ scores were assessed using Raven's APM, while the computerized tests of CRD-series were used for testing the reaction time of perception to visual stimulus (CRD311), psychomotor limbs coordination task (CRD411), and solving simple arithmetic operations (CRD11). The total test-solving (TTST) and the minimum single-task-solving (MinT) times were analyzed. On the CRD11 test, task-solving times were shorter in students with higher APM scores (r = -0.48 for TTST and r = -0.44 for MinT; < 0.001 for both). Negative associations between task-solving times and APM scores were reported on CRD311 (r = -0.30 for TTST and r = -0.33 for MinT, < 0.001 for both). Negative associations between task-solving times in CRD411 and APM scores (r = -0.40 for TTST and r = -0.30 for MinT, < 0.001 for both) were found. Faster reaction time in psychomotor limbs coordination tasks, the reaction time of perception to visual stimulus, and the reaction time of solving simple arithmetic operations were associated with a higher APM score in medical students, indicating the importance of mental speed in intelligence test performance. However, executive system functions, such as attention, planning, and goal weighting, might also impact cognitive abilities and should be considered in future research.
我们旨在研究使用瑞文高级渐进矩阵(APM)获得的智商测试分数与使用Drenovac复合反应仪(CRD)测试电池进行的心理运动测试之间的关联,同时考虑到以往的理论方法,这些方法将智能行为视为一般生物速度因素的累积结果,该因素反映在感知检测和运动决策的反应时间上。我们招募了斯普利特医学院的224名医学生。使用瑞文APM评估他们的智商分数,同时使用CRD系列计算机化测试来测试对视觉刺激的感知反应时间(CRD311)、心理运动肢体协调任务(CRD411)和解决简单算术运算(CRD11)。分析了总测试解决时间(TTST)和最短单任务解决时间(MinT)。在CRD11测试中,APM分数较高的学生任务解决时间较短(TTST的r = -0.48,MinT的r = -0.44;两者均P < 0.001)。在CRD311上报告了任务解决时间与APM分数之间的负相关(TTST的r = -0.30,MinT的r = -0.33,两者均P < 0.001)。发现CRD411中的任务解决时间与APM分数之间存在负相关(TTST的r = -0.40,MinT的r = -0.30,两者均P < 0.001)。医学生在心理运动肢体协调任务、对视觉刺激的感知反应时间和解决简单算术运算的反应时间更快与更高的APM分数相关,这表明心理速度在智力测试表现中的重要性。然而,执行系统功能,如注意力、计划和目标权重,也可能影响认知能力,应在未来的研究中予以考虑。