Suppr超能文献

按类别划分的家庭食物浪费估计及其决定因素:来自中国的证据。

Estimates of Household Food Waste by Categories and Their Determinants: Evidence from China.

作者信息

Li Xiaolei, Jiang Yi, Qing Ping

机构信息

College of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.

The Research Center of Cultural and Tourism Industries, Wuhan Business University, Wuhan 430056, China.

出版信息

Foods. 2023 Feb 10;12(4):776. doi: 10.3390/foods12040776.

Abstract

Household food waste has become a global concern for all countries in the world. This study focuses on the household level to clarify the impact of household food waste, and we use an online questionnaire survey across China to estimate the proportion of household food waste from five categories, including whole food; fruits and vegetables; poultry, eggs, meat, and dairy products; staple food; and snacks and candy. Then, we use the logit and Tobit models to estimate the relationship between the five food categories and consumer characteristics. First, the statistical analysis shows that in China, the incidence rate and proportion of household food waste are 90.7% and 9.9%, respectively. Among them, the incidence rate and proportion of fruit and vegetable waste are the highest. The results of heterogeneity also show regional differences in the incidence rate and proportion of food waste. Second, the empirical results show that label cognition, garbage disposal cognition, vegetarianism, population, children or elders in the household, the experience of starvation, and age are important explanatory factors for the incidence and proportion of food waste in the household.

摘要

家庭食物浪费已成为世界各国共同关注的全球性问题。本研究聚焦于家庭层面,以阐明家庭食物浪费的影响,我们通过在中国开展在线问卷调查,来估算五类家庭食物浪费的比例,这五类包括全食物;水果和蔬菜;家禽、蛋类、肉类及奶制品;主食;以及零食和糖果。然后,我们使用逻辑回归模型和托宾模型来估算这五类食物与消费者特征之间的关系。首先,统计分析表明,在中国,家庭食物浪费的发生率和比例分别为90.7%和9.9%。其中,水果和蔬菜浪费的发生率和比例最高。异质性结果还显示了食物浪费发生率和比例的区域差异。其次,实证结果表明,标签认知、垃圾处理认知、素食主义、家庭人口、家中儿童或老人、饥饿经历以及年龄是家庭食物浪费发生率和比例的重要解释因素。

相似文献

10
Measuring food waste in Dutch households: A synthesis of three studies.测量荷兰家庭的食物浪费:三项研究的综合。
Waste Manag. 2019 Jul 1;94:153-164. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.05.025. Epub 2019 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

2
Cultural influences on the effects of social norm appeals.文化对社会规范呼吁效果的影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 11;379(1897):20230036. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0036. Epub 2024 Jan 22.

本文引用的文献

8
Food waste from Danish households: Generation and composition.丹麦家庭的食物浪费:产生和组成。
Waste Manag. 2016 Jun;52:256-68. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.032. Epub 2016 Mar 26.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验