Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Physical Education, São Paulo State University, Rio Claro 13506-900, Brazil.
School of Physical Education and Sport of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-900, Brazil.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 6;20(4):2861. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042861.
This study aimed to investigate the effects of eccentric cycling (ECC) training on performance, physiological, and morphological parameters in comparison to concentric cycling (CON) training. Searches were conducted using PubMed, Embase, and ScienceDirect. Studies comparing the effect of ECC and CON training regimens on performance, physiological, and/or morphological parameters were included. Bayesian multilevel meta-analysis models were used to estimate the population's mean difference between chronic responses from ECC and CON training protocols. Group levels and meta-regression were used to evaluate the specific effects of subjects and study characteristics. Fourteen studies were included in this review. The meta-analyses showed that ECC training was more effective in increasing knee extensor strength, vastus lateralis fiber cross-sectional area, and six-minute walking distance compared to CON. Moreover, ECC was as effective as CON in decreasing body fat percentage. CON was more effective in increasing V˙O2max and peak power output attained during concentric incremental tests. However, group-level analyses revealed that ECC was more effective than CON in improving V˙O2max in patients with cardiopulmonary diseases. ECC is a viable modality for exercise interventions aiming to improve parameters of muscle strength, hypertrophy, functional capacity, aerobic power, and body composition, with more advantages than CON training in improving neuromuscular variables.
本研究旨在比较离心循环(ECC)训练与向心循环(CON)训练对运动表现、生理和形态参数的影响。使用 PubMed、Embase 和 ScienceDirect 进行了检索。纳入了比较 ECC 和 CON 训练方案对运动表现、生理和/或形态参数影响的研究。使用贝叶斯多层次荟萃分析模型来估计慢性 ECC 和 CON 训练方案之间人群均值差异。使用组水平和荟萃回归来评估受试者和研究特征的具体影响。本综述纳入了 14 项研究。荟萃分析表明,与 CON 相比,ECC 训练更有效地增加了膝关节伸肌力量、股外侧肌纤维横截面积和 6 分钟步行距离。此外,ECC 与 CON 一样有效降低体脂百分比。CON 更有效地增加了最大摄氧量和在向心递增测试中达到的最大功率输出。然而,组水平分析表明,ECC 在改善心肺疾病患者的最大摄氧量方面比 CON 更有效。ECC 是一种可行的运动干预方式,旨在改善肌肉力量、肥大、功能能力、有氧能力和身体成分参数,与 CON 训练相比,ECC 在改善神经肌肉变量方面具有更多优势。