• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环境治理、公共卫生支出与经济增长:OLG 模型分析。

Environmental Governance, Public Health Expenditure, and Economic Growth: Analysis in an OLG Model.

机构信息

School of Economics and Finance, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.

School of Economics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 9;20(4):3033. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043033.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20043033
PMID:36833725
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9964841/
Abstract

This article studies the relationship between environmental governance, public health expenditure, and economic growth by introducing human health status into a three-period overlapping generation dynamic general equilibrium (OLG-DGE) model and conducting a policy simulation analysis in a Chinese scenario. The main findings are generalized as follows: (i) The increase in pollution emissions per unit of output will not only lead to the deterioration of public health but also hinder long-term economic growth, while the efficiency of pollution control will improve health and output per labor unit; (ii) Although levying environmental tax will improve health status and life expectancy, it has a non-linear impact on pollution emissions and output per labor unit, which means that there are trade-offs among environmental governance, public health improvement, and economic output; and (iii) Although the increase in the proportion of public health expenditure will improve health status, its impact on life expectancy and economic output is affected by the level of environmental tax. Only when the environmental tax rate is relatively low, will increasing the proportion of public health expenditure extend life expectancy and output per labor unit.

摘要

本文通过将人类健康状况引入三期重叠世代动态一般均衡(OLG-DGE)模型,对中国情景下的政策进行模拟分析,研究了环境治理、公共卫生支出与经济增长之间的关系。主要结论概括如下:(i)单位产出污染排放的增加不仅会导致公共卫生状况恶化,还会阻碍长期经济增长,而污染控制效率则会提高每个劳动力单位的健康和产出;(ii)尽管征收环境税会改善健康状况和预期寿命,但对污染排放和每个劳动力单位的产出有非线性影响,这意味着在环境治理、公共卫生改善和经济产出之间存在权衡;(iii)公共卫生支出比例的增加虽然会改善健康状况,但对预期寿命和经济产出的影响受到环境税水平的影响。只有在环境税率相对较低的情况下,增加公共卫生支出的比例才会延长预期寿命和每个劳动力单位的产出。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa1/9964841/829877827442/ijerph-20-03033-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa1/9964841/6b46819d3f98/ijerph-20-03033-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa1/9964841/12c749d8b381/ijerph-20-03033-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa1/9964841/931752ba36f9/ijerph-20-03033-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa1/9964841/284c4bdb41c7/ijerph-20-03033-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa1/9964841/20ac7483d8d7/ijerph-20-03033-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa1/9964841/fa90171191b2/ijerph-20-03033-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa1/9964841/4ef22637379f/ijerph-20-03033-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa1/9964841/0dca825a0c23/ijerph-20-03033-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa1/9964841/829877827442/ijerph-20-03033-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa1/9964841/6b46819d3f98/ijerph-20-03033-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa1/9964841/12c749d8b381/ijerph-20-03033-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa1/9964841/931752ba36f9/ijerph-20-03033-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa1/9964841/284c4bdb41c7/ijerph-20-03033-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa1/9964841/20ac7483d8d7/ijerph-20-03033-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa1/9964841/fa90171191b2/ijerph-20-03033-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa1/9964841/4ef22637379f/ijerph-20-03033-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa1/9964841/0dca825a0c23/ijerph-20-03033-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa1/9964841/829877827442/ijerph-20-03033-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Environmental Governance, Public Health Expenditure, and Economic Growth: Analysis in an OLG Model.环境治理、公共卫生支出与经济增长:OLG 模型分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 9;20(4):3033. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043033.
2
From the Perspectives of Pollution Governance and Public Health: A Research of China's Fiscal Expenditure on Energy Conservation and Environmental Protection.从污染治理与公共健康的角度看中国节能环保财政支出
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 31;20(11):6018. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20116018.
3
Health expenditures, environmental quality, and economic development: State-of-the-art review and findings in the context of COP26.卫生支出、环境质量与经济发展:基于《联合国气候变化框架公约》第二十六次缔约方会议的最新研究进展与发现
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 26;10:954080. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.954080. eCollection 2022.
4
The impact of environmental pollution on public health expenditure: dynamic panel analysis based on Chinese provincial data.环境污染对公共卫生支出的影响:基于中国省级数据的动态面板分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jul;25(19):18853-18865. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2095-y. Epub 2018 May 1.
5
How does manufacturing haze pollution decrease in China: a decomposition study of structural model based on general equilibrium framework.中国制造业霾污染如何减少:基于一般均衡框架的结构模型分解研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(12):34872-34889. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24699-7. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
6
The economic and environmental effects of China's environmental expenditure under financing constraints.中国在融资约束下的环境支出的经济和环境影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 12;19(7):e0305246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305246. eCollection 2024.
7
The Impact of Environmental Pollution and Economic Growth on Public Health: Evidence From China.环境污染和经济增长对公共健康的影响:来自中国的证据。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 28;10:861157. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.861157. eCollection 2022.
8
Environmental pollution, environmental regulation, and labor income share.环境污染、环境规制与劳动收入份额
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Dec;27(36):45161-45174. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10408-9. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
9
A Study of Fiscal Expenditure Structure and Green Economic Growth Effects: A Sample from Asian Economies.财政支出结构与绿色经济增长效应研究:来自亚洲经济体的样本。
J Environ Public Health. 2022 Sep 22;2022:2180532. doi: 10.1155/2022/2180532. eCollection 2022.
10
Effects of Carbon Tax on Urban Carbon Emission Reduction: Evidence in China Environmental Governance.碳税对城市碳减排的影响:中国环境治理的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 27;20(3):2289. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032289.

引用本文的文献

1
Eco-friendly revenues for healthcare: assessing the relationship between green taxation, public health expenditures, and life expectancy in China.医疗保健的环保收入:评估绿色税收、公共卫生支出与中国预期寿命之间的关系。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 22;12:1358730. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1358730. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Human Capital Formation, Life Expectancy, and the Process of Development.人力资本形成、预期寿命与发展进程。
Am Econ Rev. 2005 Dec;95(5):1653-72. doi: 10.1257/000282805775014380.
2
Engaging with Comparative Risk Appraisals: Public Views on Policy Priorities for Environmental Risk Governance.参与比较风险评估:公众对环境风险管理政策重点的看法。
Risk Anal. 2017 Sep;37(9):1683-1692. doi: 10.1111/risa.12735. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
3
Evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China's Huai River policy.
关于中国淮河流域政策对预期寿命受持续暴露于空气污染影响的证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 6;110(32):12936-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300018110. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
4
Pollution exposure and child health: evidence for infants and toddlers in Germany.污染暴露与儿童健康:德国婴幼儿的证据。
J Health Econ. 2012 Jan;31(1):180-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.09.006. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
5
Air pollution and infant health: Lessons from New Jersey.空气污染与婴儿健康:新泽西州的经验教训
J Health Econ. 2009 May;28(3):688-703. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.02.001. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
6
Pay-as-you-go financed public pensions in a model of endogenous growth and fertility.内生增长与生育模型中的现收现付制公共养老金。
J Popul Econ. 1999;12(4):625-40. doi: 10.1007/s001480050117.