• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

碳税对城市碳减排的影响:中国环境治理的证据。

Effects of Carbon Tax on Urban Carbon Emission Reduction: Evidence in China Environmental Governance.

机构信息

College of Finance, Institute of High-Quality Development in Huaihai Economic Zone, Xuzhou University of Technology, Xuzhou 221018, China.

China Institute of Urban Governance, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 27;20(3):2289. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032289.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20032289
PMID:36767655
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9914963/
Abstract

Carbon tax is an important economic instrument in achieving the goal of carbon emission reduction and sustainable development. This paper investigates the effects of carbon tax on carbon emission reduction in China. First, a non-competitive input-output table for Carbon Emissions of 28 sectors in China after Carbon Tax was established, based on the "2018 China Non-competitive Input-Output Table (42 Sectors)" and the carbon emission data of sectors provided by China Carbon Emission Accounts and Datasets (CEADs). Then, an input-output price model was established to study the changes on product price, GDP, employment, and carbon dioxide emissions of 28 sectors after carbon taxing ranged from 10 to 200. When the carbon tax rate reaches 200 yuan/ton, the inflation rate will be 5.907%, the total GDP will be decreased to 1.910%, the total labor force will be decreased to 1.744%, and the total carbon emission reduction rate will be increased to 8.171%. Results showed that with the increases in carbon tax, the inflation rate was increased, the rate of carbon emission reduction was increased, and the negative effects on GDP and employment were also increased. Suggestions on policy making, such as combination of carbon taxing and carbon trading, dynamic adjustment mechanism, tax neutrality, and forcing active carbon reduction, were proposed to minimize the adverse effect of levying carbon tax. The results from this paper would provide a reference for the policy making on carbon management.

摘要

碳税是实现碳排放减排和可持续发展目标的重要经济手段。本文研究了碳税对中国碳排放减排的影响。首先,根据《2018 年中国非竞争投入产出表(42 部门)》和中国碳排放账户与数据集(CEADs)提供的部门碳排放数据,建立了中国 28 个部门碳税后的非竞争投入产出表碳排放量。然后,建立投入产出价格模型,研究碳税从 10 元到 200 元/吨变化时,28 个部门的产品价格、国内生产总值(GDP)、就业和二氧化碳排放量的变化。当碳税税率达到 200 元/吨时,通货膨胀率将上升 5.907%,总 GDP 将下降到 1.910%,总劳动力将下降到 1.744%,总碳减排率将上升到 8.171%。结果表明,随着碳税的增加,通货膨胀率上升,碳减排率上升,对 GDP 和就业的负面影响也增加。本文提出了一些政策制定建议,如碳税与碳交易相结合、动态调整机制、税收中性和强制积极减排等,以最小化征收碳税的不利影响。本文的研究结果可为碳管理政策制定提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/9914963/2b6e6ead9596/ijerph-20-02289-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/9914963/c9c13023571c/ijerph-20-02289-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/9914963/3493c1d67bb6/ijerph-20-02289-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/9914963/7309c94bb2cc/ijerph-20-02289-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/9914963/895f8f710286/ijerph-20-02289-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/9914963/4ee0940fcdb9/ijerph-20-02289-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/9914963/dd107327fddb/ijerph-20-02289-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/9914963/fce35a2665a4/ijerph-20-02289-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/9914963/2b6e6ead9596/ijerph-20-02289-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/9914963/c9c13023571c/ijerph-20-02289-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/9914963/3493c1d67bb6/ijerph-20-02289-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/9914963/7309c94bb2cc/ijerph-20-02289-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/9914963/895f8f710286/ijerph-20-02289-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/9914963/4ee0940fcdb9/ijerph-20-02289-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/9914963/dd107327fddb/ijerph-20-02289-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/9914963/fce35a2665a4/ijerph-20-02289-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/9914963/2b6e6ead9596/ijerph-20-02289-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of Carbon Tax on Urban Carbon Emission Reduction: Evidence in China Environmental Governance.碳税对城市碳减排的影响:中国环境治理的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 27;20(3):2289. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032289.
2
The optimal industrial carbon tax for China under carbon intensity constraints: a dynamic input-output optimization model.在碳强度约束下中国最优工业碳税:一个动态投入产出优化模型。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(35):53191-53211. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19162-6. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
3
Impact of energy structure on carbon emission and economy of China in the scenario of carbon taxation.碳税情景下能源结构对中国碳排放及经济的影响
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Mar 25;762:143093. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143093. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
4
Comparing the impacts of carbon tax and carbon emission trading, which regulation is more effective?比较碳税和碳排放交易的影响,哪种监管措施更有效?
J Environ Manage. 2023 Mar 15;330:117156. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117156. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
5
The Effect of Carbon Emission Taxes on Environmental and Economic Systems.碳排放税对环境和经济系统的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 20;19(6):3706. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063706.
6
How to Promote Low-Carbon Economic Development? A Comprehensive Assessment of Carbon Tax Policy in China.如何促进低碳经济发展?中国碳税政策的综合评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 12;18(20):10699. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010699.
7
Synergistic effect of carbon ETS and carbon tax under China's peak emission target: A dynamic CGE analysis.中国碳排放峰值目标下碳交易体系与碳税的协同效应:动态可计算一般均衡分析
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jun 15;825:154076. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154076. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
8
How carbon trading policy should be integrated with carbon tax policy-laboratory evidence from a model of the current state of carbon pricing policy in China.碳排放交易政策应如何与碳税政策相结合——来自中国碳定价政策现状模型的实验证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(9):23851-23869. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23787-y. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
9
Does fuel tax decrease carbon dioxide emissions in Turkey? Evidence from an asymmetric nonlinear cointegration test and error correction model.燃料税是否能减少土耳其的二氧化碳排放?来自非对称非线性协整检验和误差修正模型的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jul;28(26):35094-35101. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12907-9. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
10
Simulations for double dividend of carbon tax and improved energy efficiency in the transportation industry.交通行业碳税与提高能源效率的双重红利模拟
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(7):19083-19096. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23411-z. Epub 2022 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on Utilizable Calcium from Calcium Carbide Slag with Different Extractors and Its Effect on CO Mineralization.不同萃取剂对电石渣中可利用钙的研究及其对CO矿化的影响
Materials (Basel). 2024 Feb 26;17(5):1068. doi: 10.3390/ma17051068.

本文引用的文献

1
Revisiting the social cost of carbon.重新审视碳的社会成本。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Feb 14;114(7):1518-1523. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1609244114. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
2
Emissions trading: the carbon game.排放交易:碳游戏。
Nature. 2004 Nov 18;432(7015):268-70. doi: 10.1038/432268a.