• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低碳政策与城市绿色全要素能源效率:基于空间双重差分方法的证据。

The Low-Carbon Policy and Urban Green Total Factor Energy Efficiency: Evidence from a Spatial Difference-in-Difference Method.

机构信息

School of Law and Business, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430200, China.

School of Economics and Statistics, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 16;20(4):3498. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043498.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20043498
PMID:36834192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9965809/
Abstract

In the post-epidemic background of the low-carbon economy and sustainable development, the low-carbon city pilot program (LCCP) is viewed as a practical method of improving energy efficiency. This study explores the spatial spillover effects of LCCP on green total factor energy efficiency () by developing a spatial difference-in-difference (SDID) model. Furthermore, we apply the mediating effects model to verify whether the rational allocation of resources is an influential channel for the spillover effect of LCCP policies. The results indicate that the LCCP policy has not only improved the local by approximately 1.8%, but it also has a profound impact on the surrounding regions as well, which is about 76.5% that of the pilot cities. Additionally, the estimated results of the mediating effect model indicate that optimizing labor force and capital allocations are two essential channels through which the LCCP policy may contribute to improving regional cities' . Accordingly, the pilot cities should establish specific measures for rational resource allocation and promote the spatial spillover model of sustainable development.

摘要

在后疫情时代低碳经济和可持续发展背景下,低碳城市试点项目(LCCP)被视为提高能源效率的一种切实可行的方法。本研究通过开发空间双重差分(SDID)模型,探讨了 LCCP 对绿色全要素能源效率()的空间溢出效应。此外,我们还应用中介效应模型来验证资源的合理配置是否是 LCCP 政策溢出效应的影响渠道。结果表明,LCCP 政策不仅使本地提高了约 1.8%,而且对周边地区也产生了深远的影响,约为试点城市的 76.5%。此外,中介效应模型的估计结果表明,优化劳动力和资本配置是 LCCP 政策促进区域城市提高的两个重要渠道。因此,试点城市应制定具体的资源合理配置措施,并推广可持续发展的空间溢出模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/211d/9965809/0134362fdc2f/ijerph-20-03498-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/211d/9965809/68df1d094806/ijerph-20-03498-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/211d/9965809/0134362fdc2f/ijerph-20-03498-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/211d/9965809/68df1d094806/ijerph-20-03498-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/211d/9965809/0134362fdc2f/ijerph-20-03498-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Low-Carbon Policy and Urban Green Total Factor Energy Efficiency: Evidence from a Spatial Difference-in-Difference Method.低碳政策与城市绿色全要素能源效率:基于空间双重差分方法的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 16;20(4):3498. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043498.
2
The impact of low-carbon city pilot policy on green total-factor productivity in China's cities.低碳城市试点政策对中国城市绿色全要素生产率的影响
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(9):24299-24318. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23934-5. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
3
Assessing the low-carbon city pilot policy on carbon emission from consumption and production in China: how underlying mechanism and spatial spillover effect?评估中国低碳城市试点政策对消费和生产碳排放的影响:潜在机制和空间溢出效应如何?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct;29(47):71958-71977. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21005-3. Epub 2022 May 24.
4
Boosting the green total factor energy efficiency in urban China: Does low-carbon city policy matter?提升中国城市绿色全要素能源效率:低碳城市政策是否重要?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(37):56341-56356. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19553-9. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
5
How Low-Carbon Pilots Affect Chinese Urban Energy Efficiency: An Explanation from Technological Progress.低碳试点如何影响中国城市能源效率:来自技术进步的解释。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 23;19(23):15563. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315563.
6
Nonlinear and spatial spillover effects of the digital economy on green total factor energy efficiency: evidence from 281 cities in China.数字经济对绿色全要素能源效率的非线性和空间溢出效应:来自中国 281 个城市的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul;30(34):81896-81916. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22694-6. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
7
The impacts of low-carbon city pilot policies on natural population growth: empirical evidence from China's prefecture-level cities.低碳城市试点政策对自然人口增长的影响:来自中国地级市的经验证据。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 14;11:1214070. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1214070. eCollection 2023.
8
Can low-carbon city construction reduce carbon intensity?Empirical evidence from low-carbon city pilot policy in China.低碳城市建设能否降低碳强度?来自中国低碳城市试点政策的经验证据。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Apr 15;332:117363. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117363. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
9
Has China's Low-Carbon City Construction Enhanced the Green Utilization Efficiency of Urban Land?中国的低碳城市建设是否提高了城市土地的绿色利用效率?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 10;19(16):9844. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169844.
10
Blue sky defense in low-carbon pilot cities: A spatial spillover perspective of carbon emission efficiency.低碳试点城市蓝天保卫战:碳排放效率的空间溢出视角
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Nov 10;846:157509. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157509. Epub 2022 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Greening China's Growth: Assessing the Synergistic Impact of Financial Development and Technological Innovation on Environmental Pollution Reduction-A Spatial STIRPAT Analysis.绿色中国增长:评估金融发展和技术创新对减少环境污染的协同影响——空间 STIRPAT 分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 14;20(6):5120. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065120.

本文引用的文献

1
Can River Chief System Policy Improve Enterprises' Energy Efficiency? Evidence from China.河长制政策能否提高企业能源效率?来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 7;20(4):2882. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042882.
2
Boosting the green total factor energy efficiency in urban China: Does low-carbon city policy matter?提升中国城市绿色全要素能源效率:低碳城市政策是否重要?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(37):56341-56356. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19553-9. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
3
Does FDI improve green total factor energy efficiency under heterogeneous environmental regulation? Evidence from China.
FDI 是否会在异质环境规制下提高绿色全要素能源效率?来自中国的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(17):25665-25678. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17771-1. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
4
Dynamic environmental regulation threshold effect of technical progress on green total factor energy efficiency: evidence from China.技术进步对绿色全要素能源效率的动态环境调控阈值效应:来自中国的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(6):8804-8815. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16292-1. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
5
The drivers of energy-related CO emissions in Brazil: a regional application of the STIRPAT model.巴西能源相关 CO 排放的驱动因素:STIRPAT 模型的区域应用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Oct;28(37):51745-51762. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14097-w. Epub 2021 May 15.
6
The effects of National High-tech Industrial Development Zones on economic development and environmental pollution in China during 2003-2018.国家高新技术产业开发区对中国 2003-2018 年经济发展和环境污染的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jan;28(1):1097-1107. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10553-1. Epub 2020 Aug 23.
7
Analyzing extended STIRPAT model of urbanization and CO emissions in Asian countries.分析亚洲国家城市化和二氧化碳排放的扩展 STIRPAT 模型。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Dec;27(36):45911-45924. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10276-3. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
8
Carbon dioxide emission-intensity in climate projections: Comparing the observational record to socio-economic scenarios.气候预测中的二氧化碳排放强度:将观测记录与社会经济情景进行比较。
Energy (Oxf). 2017 Sep 15;135:718-725. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.119.