Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK.
Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 17;20(4):3568. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043568.
There has been much debate recently on the participation of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) athletes in sport, particularly in relation to fairness, safety and inclusion. The 2021 IOC Framework on Fairness, Inclusion and Non-discrimination acknowledges the central role that eligibility criteria play in ensuring fairness, particularly in the female category, and states that athletes should not be excluded solely on the basis of their TGD identity.
To identify policies that address TGD athlete participation in the 15 major United Kingdom (UK) sporting organisations and to summarise the evidence for each of these policies.
A scoping review of TGD policies from the 15 major UK sporting organisations.
Eleven of the governing bodies had publicly available TGD policies. Most of the sporting associations drew guidance from the official 2015 IOC Consensus Meeting on Sex Reassignment and Hyperandrogenism, particularly with regard to physiological testosterone levels. Many organisations referenced their policies as a guide for decision making but stated that they ultimately made case-by-case decisions on an athlete's eligibility. Relevant considerations not addressed in most policies included pre- versus post-pubertal athletes, justification for testosterone thresholds, the length of time out of competitive action (if any) for transitioning athletes, the irreversible advantage from male puberty (if any), the responsibility for and frequency of follow up for hormonal testing and the consequences for athletes outside set testosterone limits.
There is a lack of consensus among the top 15 UK sporting organizations relating to elite sport participation for TGD athletes. It would be useful for sport organizations to work together to develop greater standardization/consensus for TGD athlete policies, taking into consideration fairness, safety and inclusion in each sport.
最近,关于跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)运动员参与体育运动的问题引起了广泛争议,特别是在公平性、安全性和包容性方面。2021 年国际奥委会公平、包容和不歧视框架承认资格标准在确保公平性方面起着核心作用,特别是在女性类别中,并指出不应仅仅基于运动员的 TGD 身份将其排除在外。
确定解决 15 个主要英国(UK)体育组织中 TGD 运动员参与问题的政策,并总结这些政策的证据。
对 15 个主要英国体育组织的 TGD 政策进行范围界定审查。
11 个管理机构拥有公开的 TGD 政策。大多数体育协会都从官方 2015 年国际奥委会关于性别重置和雄激素过多症的共识会议中汲取了指导,特别是在生理睾酮水平方面。许多组织将其政策作为决策指南,但表示他们最终会对运动员的资格做出个案决定。大多数政策没有涉及到的相关考虑因素包括青春期前和青春期后的运动员、睾酮阈值的合理性、过渡运动员离开竞技状态的时间长短(如果有)、来自男性青春期的不可逆转优势(如果有)、荷尔蒙测试的责任和频率,以及超出规定睾酮限制的运动员的后果。
在涉及 TGD 运动员的精英体育参与问题上,15 个英国顶级体育组织之间缺乏共识。对于体育组织来说,共同努力制定更标准化/一致的 TGD 运动员政策,考虑到每个运动项目的公平性、安全性和包容性,将是有益的。