Mavrovouniotis Ilias, Fylaktou Asimina, Stagou Maria, Ouranos Konstantinos, Lioulios Georgios, Evgenikaki Efthimia, Exindari Maria, Gioula Georgia
Microbiology Department, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece.
National Peripheral Histocompatibility Center, Immunology Department, Hippokration General Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Life (Basel). 2023 Feb 8;13(2):474. doi: 10.3390/life13020474.
The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 has raised considerable concern about the detrimental effects it can induce in public health, with the interest of the scientific community being focused on the development of preventive and therapeutic approaches. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are amongst vulnerable populations for critical illness owing to the presence of other comorbidities, their defective immune system, and their inability of self-isolation. To date, vaccination constitutes the most promising method to manage viral dispersion. Therefore, it is particularly important to investigate the effectiveness of available vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in this risk group. Here, we summarize initial experience regarding the humoral and cellular immune responses elicited in dialysis patients after completion of the recommended vaccination regimen, as well as after booster dose administration, with one of the two mRNA vaccines, namely, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273. In conclusion, a significantly diminished and delayed immune pattern was observed in ESRD patients compared to healthy population, with a peak in antibody titers occurring 3-5 weeks after the second dose. A booster dose significantly augmented the immune response in dialysis patients with either mRNA-based vaccine. Variables adversely correlating with the weak immunogenicity observed in dialysis patients include immunosuppressive therapy, older age, comorbidities, longer time in hemodialysis treatment, and higher body mass index. On the contrary, previous COVID-19 infection and administration of the mRNA-1273 vaccine are deemed to induce a more favorable immune response. Further investigation is needed to thoroughly understand the efficacy of mRNA-based vaccines in hemodialysis patients and define predictive factors that can influence it.
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的爆发引发了人们对其可能给公共卫生带来的有害影响的极大关注,科学界的兴趣集中在预防和治疗方法的开发上。终末期肾病(ESRD)患者由于存在其他合并症、免疫系统缺陷以及无法自我隔离,属于重症易感人群。迄今为止,接种疫苗是控制病毒传播最有前景的方法。因此,研究现有疫苗对这一风险群体中SARS-CoV-2的有效性尤为重要。在此,我们总结了在透析患者完成推荐的疫苗接种方案后以及接种加强针后,使用两种mRNA疫苗之一,即BNT162b2和mRNA-1273所引发的体液免疫和细胞免疫反应的初步经验。总之,与健康人群相比,ESRD患者的免疫模式明显减弱且延迟,抗体滴度在第二剂接种后3至5周达到峰值。加强针显著增强了接受任何一种基于mRNA疫苗的透析患者的免疫反应。与透析患者中观察到的弱免疫原性呈负相关的变量包括免疫抑制治疗、年龄较大、合并症、血液透析治疗时间较长以及体重指数较高。相反,既往感染过新型冠状病毒肺炎以及接种mRNA-1273疫苗被认为能诱导更有利的免疫反应。需要进一步研究以全面了解基于mRNA的疫苗在血液透析患者中的疗效,并确定可能影响疗效的预测因素。