Suppr超能文献

比较手指屈肌抗阻训练,有和没有血流限制,对高级攀岩者的感知和生理反应的影响。

Comparison of finger flexor resistance training, with and without blood flow restriction, on perceptional and physiological responses in advanced climbers.

机构信息

Faculty of Education, Arts and Sports, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 133 6851, Sogndal, PB, Norway.

Department of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 25;13(1):3287. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30499-x.

Abstract

This study compared perceptional and physiological responses of finger flexor exercise performed with free flow and blood flow restriction (BFR). Thirteen male advanced climbers completed three sessions of finger flexor resistance exercise at (1) 40% of MVC (Low) and (2) 75% of MVC (High) and (3) BFR at 40% of MVC (Low + BFR) in a randomized and counterbalanced order. Rate of perceived exertion for effort (RPE) and discomfort (RPD), session pleasure/displeasure (sPDF), exercise enjoyment (EES), lactate concentration and oxygen saturation were recorded after the last set. Both low-intensity sessions induced higher RPD than High (p = 0.018-0.022, ES = 1.01-1.09) and High was perceived as more enjoyable than Low-BFR (p = 0.031, ES = 1.08). No differences were found for RPE or sPDF (p = 0.132-0.804). Lactate was elevated more after High than the Low-sessions (p < 0.001, ES = 1.88-2.08). Capillary oxygen saturation was lower after Low + BFR compared to the other sessions (p = 0.031, ES = 1.04-1.27). Finally, the exercise volume was greater in Low compared to High (p = 0.022, ES = 1.14) and Low + BFR (p = 0.020, ES = 0.77). In conclusion, among advanced male climbers, performing Low + BFR led to a similar exercise volume but was perceived as more discomforting and less enjoyable compared to High. The Low session yielded similar responses as the Low + BFR but required a much greater exercise volume.

摘要

本研究比较了在自由流动和血流限制(BFR)下进行手指屈肌运动时的感知和生理反应。13 名男性高级攀岩者以随机和平衡的顺序完成了三次手指屈肌阻力运动,分别为(1)40%最大握力(低强度),(2)75%最大握力(高强度)和(3)40%最大握力的 BFR(低+BFR)。最后一组运动后记录了努力的感觉用力(RPE)和不适(RPD)、运动愉悦/不愉悦(sPDF)、运动享受(EES)、乳酸浓度和氧饱和度。低强度运动引起的 RPD 高于高强度运动(p=0.018-0.022,ES=1.01-1.09),高强度运动比低+BFR 更受欢迎(p=0.031,ES=1.08)。RPE 或 sPDF 无差异(p=0.132-0.804)。高运动后乳酸升高高于低运动(p<0.001,ES=1.88-2.08)。低+BFR 后毛细血管氧饱和度低于其他运动(p=0.031,ES=1.04-1.27)。最后,低强度运动比高强度运动(p=0.022,ES=1.14)和低+BFR(p=0.020,ES=0.77)的运动量大。综上所述,在高级男性攀岩者中,与高强度运动相比,低+BFR 导致相似的运动量,但被认为更不适和不那么愉快。低强度运动产生了与低+BFR 相似的反应,但需要更大的运动量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7cd/9968301/f5f6bfa301a5/41598_2023_30499_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验