血流限制阻力运动后主观用力程度的会话评分

Session rating of perceived exertion following resistance exercise with blood flow restriction.

作者信息

Vieira Amilton, Gadelha André B, Ferreira-Junior João B, Vieira Carlos A, Soares Edgard de Melo Keene von Koenig, Cadore Eduardo L, Wagner Dale R, Bottaro Martim

机构信息

College of Physical Education, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Federal, Brazil.

College of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2015 Sep;35(5):323-7. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12128. Epub 2014 Jan 19.

Abstract

Session ratings of perceived exertion (SRPE) provide a valid and reliable indicator of resistance exercise session intensity. However, there is a lack of studies on the effects of resistance exercise with blood flow restriction (BFR) on SRPE. Thus, the aim of this study is to compare the effects of resistance exercise at high intensity versus low intensity with BFR on internal training load measured by SRPE. Thirteen young (22.2 ± 3.8 years) resistance-trained men (training experience 3.2 ± 2.4 years) participated in the study protocol. After determining one maximum repetition (1-RM), the subjects were assigned to two groups in a counterbalanced design (i) high-intensity exercise (HIE, performed one training session at 80% of 1-RM) and (ii) low intensity with BFR (BFR, performed an exercise session at 50% of 1-RM with BFR). During each session, subjects performed three sets of unilateral elbow flexion leading to concentric failure with a 1-min rest interval between sets. A cuff around the arm, inflated at 110 mmHg, was used continuously for BFR. The SRPE was reported 30 min after the end of the session. The low intensity with BFR showed lower total work (197.13 ± 63.49 versus 300.92 ± 71.81 kg; P = 0.002) and higher SRPE (9 versus 6; P = 0.007) than high-intensity resistance exercise. The present results indicate that BFR is an important factor to increase internal training load. Future studies should investigate the physiological stress imposed by different training methods rather than just quantify the external training load such as intensity or volume.

摘要

训练期间的自感用力度(SRPE)为抗阻训练课的强度提供了一个有效且可靠的指标。然而,关于血流限制(BFR)抗阻训练对SRPE影响的研究较少。因此,本研究旨在比较高强度与低强度BFR抗阻训练对通过SRPE测量的内部训练负荷的影响。13名年轻(22.2±3.8岁)的抗阻训练男性(训练经验3.2±2.4年)参与了本研究方案。在确定一次最大重复量(1-RM)后,受试者被以平衡设计分为两组:(i)高强度运动(HIE,以1-RM的80%进行一次训练课)和(ii)低强度BFR(BFR,以1-RM的50%进行一次BFR训练课)。在每次训练课期间,受试者进行三组单侧屈肘直至向心收缩力竭,组间休息1分钟。持续使用一个充气至110 mmHg的手臂袖带进行BFR。训练课结束30分钟后报告SRPE。与高强度抗阻训练相比,低强度BFR训练的总功更低(197.13±63.49对300.92±71.81 kg;P=0.002),而SRPE更高(9对6;P=0.007)。目前的结果表明,BFR是增加内部训练负荷的一个重要因素。未来的研究应调查不同训练方法所施加的生理压力,而不仅仅是量化外部训练负荷,如强度或量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索