University of Amsterdam, Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; University of Amsterdam, Student Health Service, UvA, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam, Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J Affect Disord. 2023 May 15;329:207-217. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.02.096. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
Loneliness and social isolation are known to be associated with depression, general anxiety, and social anxiety. However, knowledge on the overlapping and unique features of these relationships, while differentiating between social loneliness (perceived absence of an acceptable social network) and emotional loneliness (perceived absence of close connections), is lacking.
We constructed a network analysis to examine the relationships between self-reported social loneliness, emotional loneliness, social isolation, depression, general anxiety and social anxiety in a large sample of university students (N = 7314, 67.4 % female, range 16.3-75.8 years, M = 23.9, SD = 5.7). Hierarchical regression analyses were used to examine whether depression, general anxiety and social anxiety moderated the relationship between social isolation and loneliness types. As comorbidity between anxiety and depression is high, the role of anxiety as a moderator in the relationship between depression and loneliness types was also examined.
The network analysis showed that social loneliness was most strongly explained by social isolation, whereas emotional loneliness was most strongly explained by social anxiety and depression. General anxiety was solely related to loneliness through depression. The regression analyses showed that general and social anxiety and depression did not moderate the relationship between social isolation and loneliness types.
Differences found between loneliness types may be influenced by a methodological artifact of the DJGLS.
These findings highlight the importance of social anxiety over general anxiety in relation to loneliness. Also, it showed unique relationships for social- and emotional loneliness with psycho-social variables, which has important implications for research- and clinical settings.
孤独和社会隔离与抑郁、广泛性焦虑和社交焦虑有关。然而,对于这些关系的重叠和独特特征的了解,以及区分社交孤独(感知到缺乏可接受的社交网络)和情感孤独(感知到缺乏亲密关系)的知识仍然缺乏。
我们构建了一个网络分析,以检查在一个大学生大样本中(N=7314,67.4%为女性,年龄范围为 16.3-75.8 岁,M=23.9,SD=5.7),自我报告的社交孤独、情感孤独、社会隔离、抑郁、广泛性焦虑和社交焦虑之间的关系。分层回归分析用于检查抑郁、广泛性焦虑和社交焦虑是否调节了社会隔离与孤独类型之间的关系。由于焦虑和抑郁之间的共病率很高,因此还检查了焦虑作为抑郁和孤独类型之间关系的调节剂的作用。
网络分析表明,社交孤独主要由社会隔离解释,而情感孤独主要由社交焦虑和抑郁解释。广泛性焦虑仅通过抑郁与孤独相关。回归分析表明,广泛性和社交焦虑以及抑郁并没有调节社会隔离与孤独类型之间的关系。
孤独类型之间的差异可能受到 DJGLS 的方法学artifact 的影响。
这些发现强调了社交焦虑相对于广泛性焦虑在孤独方面的重要性。此外,它显示了社交和情感孤独与心理社会变量的独特关系,这对研究和临床环境具有重要意义。