Yang Ye, Gao Junyan, Jiang Yaofeng, DU Haoliang, Geng Liguo, Li Ao, Zhao Ning, Xu Yuqin, Liu Xueyao, Gao Xia
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School,Jiangsu Provincial Key Medical Discipline(Laboratory),Research Institute of Otolaryngology,Nanjing,210008,China.
Department of Technical Counseling,Jiangsu Children's Rehabilitation Research Center.
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Mar;37(3):197-200;205. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.03.008.
To investigate the long-term rehabilitation outcomes of children with cochlear implants(CI) and provide constructive guidance for clinical application. Fifteen children with unilateral CI over 5 years(CI group) were recruited. Ten children with normal hearing were recruited as the healthy control group. The project collected aided sound-field hearing thresholds and speech recognition scores using disyllabic words and C-HINT sentences with and without speech noise for 15 children with unilateral CI. In addition, children's guardians were requested to fill out the Mandarin Parental Perspectives questionnaire(MPP) in order to evaluate the hearing aspects of quality of life. MPP results from the 15 children were then compared with previous responses from 17 unilateral CI children whose overall CI wearing time was one year(CI control group). The aided pure-tone average(PTA) of the recruited children was below 35 dB HL, all children reached 80% for the speech recognition test in a quiet environment, yet their performance decreased in a noisy environment. Regarding the hearing aspects of the MPP questionnaire results, recruited children demonstrated better results than those from CI control group(<0.05). Speech noise had a significant impact on the recognition rate, and the CI group had higher recognition rate scores in the quiet environment than in the noise environment(two-syllable words =18.81, <0.001, short sentences =16.48, <0.001). In the comparison of quality of life, in the dimension of "support for children", both the CI group and the CI control group can obtain better benefits, and there is no statistically significant difference between the groups(>0.05). The CI group benefited more significantly, and the scores were higher than those of the CI control group(<0.05). The long-term hearing outcome of children with CI is adequate for daily communication, but there is still a gap compared with hearing children of the same age, and they still need support from the entire society.
为研究人工耳蜗植入(CI)儿童的长期康复效果,并为临床应用提供建设性指导。招募了15名单侧人工耳蜗植入超过5年的儿童(CI组)。招募了10名听力正常的儿童作为健康对照组。该项目收集了15名单侧人工耳蜗植入儿童在有无言语噪声情况下使用双音节词和C-HINT句子的助听声场听阈和言语识别分数。此外,要求儿童监护人填写普通话家长观点问卷(MPP),以评估听力方面的生活质量。然后将这15名儿童的MPP结果与17名单侧人工耳蜗植入儿童(CI对照组)之前的回答进行比较,这些儿童的人工耳蜗总体佩戴时间为1年。招募儿童的助听纯音平均听阈(PTA)低于35 dB HL,所有儿童在安静环境中的言语识别测试均达到80%,但在嘈杂环境中其表现下降。关于MPP问卷结果的听力方面,招募儿童的结果优于CI对照组(P<0.05)。言语噪声对识别率有显著影响,CI组在安静环境中的识别率得分高于嘈杂环境(双音节词=18.81,P<0.001,短句=16.48,P<0.001)。在生活质量比较中,在“对儿童的支持”维度上,CI组和CI对照组都能获得较好的益处,两组之间无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。CI组受益更显著,得分高于CI对照组(P<0.05)。人工耳蜗植入儿童的长期听力结果足以满足日常交流,但与同龄听力正常儿童相比仍有差距,他们仍需要全社会的支持。