Nadkarni Abhijit, Gandhi Yashi, Bhatia Urvita, Velleman Richard
Centre for Global Mental Health, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Addictions Research Group, Sangath, Porvorim, India.
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2022 Dec 9;10:e3. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2022.57. eCollection 2023.
The alcohol-attributable disease burden is greater in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) as compared to high-income countries. Despite the effectiveness of interventions such as health promotion and education, brief interventions, psychological treatments, family-focused interventions, and biomedical treatments, access to evidence-based care for alcohol use disorders (AUDs) in LMICs is limited. This can be explained by poor access to general health and mental health care, limited availability of relevant clinical skills among health care providers, lack of political will and/or financial resources, historical stigma and discrimination against people with AUDs, and poor planning and implementation of policies. Access to care for AUDs in LMICs could be improved through evidence-based strategies such as designing innovative, local and culturally acceptable solutions, health system strengthening by adopting a collaborative stepped care approach, horizontal integration of care into existing models of care (e.g., HIV care), task sharing to optimise limited human resources, working with families of individuals with AUD, and leveraging technology-enabled interventions. Moving ahead, research, policy and practice in LMICs need to focus on evidence-based decision-making, responsiveness to context and culture, working collaboratively with a range of stakeholders to design and implement interventions, identifying upstream social determinants of AUDs, developing and evaluating policy interventions such as increased taxation on alcohol, and developing services for special populations (e.g., adolescents) with AUDs.
与高收入国家相比,低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)中酒精所致疾病负担更为严重。尽管诸如健康促进与教育、简短干预、心理治疗、以家庭为中心的干预以及生物医学治疗等干预措施具有成效,但在低收入和中等收入国家,酒精使用障碍(AUDs)的循证治疗服务获取有限。这可归因于难以获得综合医疗和心理健康服务、医疗服务提供者中相关临床技能的可及性有限、缺乏政治意愿和/或财政资源、对患有酒精使用障碍者的历史污名化和歧视,以及政策规划和实施不力。通过循证策略,例如设计创新、本土化且符合文化习惯的解决方案、采用协作式逐步照护方法加强卫生系统、将照护横向整合到现有照护模式(如艾滋病照护)、任务分担以优化有限的人力资源、与患有酒精使用障碍者的家庭合作以及利用技术驱动的干预措施,可以改善低收入和中等收入国家对酒精使用障碍的照护。展望未来,低收入和中等收入国家的研究、政策和实践需要聚焦于循证决策、对背景和文化的响应能力、与一系列利益相关者合作设计和实施干预措施、确定酒精使用障碍的上游社会决定因素、制定和评估诸如提高酒精税等政策干预措施,以及为患有酒精使用障碍的特殊人群(如青少年)开发服务。