• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国大陆镇痛与镇静教学实践探索:中国镇痛镇静专家共识经验

Exploration of teaching practice of analgesia and sedation in mainland China: CASER experience.

作者信息

Su Longxiang, Li Shu, Lou Ran, Liu Ying, Zhang Hua, Jiang Li

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 8;10:1010964. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1010964. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2023.1010964
PMID:36844200
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9945524/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Analgesia and sedation assessments vary widely in clinical performance. This study investigated the cognition of intensivist and the importance of training for analgesia and sedation through the Chinese Analgesia and Sedation Education & Research (CASER) group training program.

METHODS

A total of 107 participants studied the training courses on the "Sedation, Analgesia and Consciousness Assessment of Critically Ill Patients" held by CASER from June 2020 to June 2021. Ninety-eight valid questionnaires were recovered. The content of the questionnaire included the preface, general information of the trainees, students' awareness of the importance of analgesia and sedation evaluation and related guidelines, and professional test questions.

RESULTS

All respondents were senior professionals engaged in the ICU. A total of 92.86% believed that analgesia and sedation treatment were very important parts of the ICU, and 76.5% believed that they had mastered relevant professional knowledge. However, when evaluating the relevant professional theory and practice of the respondents from an objective point of view, it can be seen that only 28.57% of the respondents could reach the passing line in the specific case analysis scenario. Before participating in the training, 42.86% of the medical staff believed that analgesia and sedation treatment should be evaluated in the daily work of the ICU; after participating in the training, 62.24% of the medical staff believed that the evaluation was necessary and believed that they had improved after the training. Moreover, 69.4% of the respondents affirmed the necessity and significance of jointly undertaking the task of analgesia and sedation in Chinese ICUs.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that the assessment of analgesia and sedation is not standardized in the ICU in mainland China. The importance and significance of standardized training for analgesia and sedation are presented. The CASER working group thus established has a long way to go in its future work.

摘要

目的

镇痛和镇静评估在临床实践中的差异很大。本研究通过中国镇痛与镇静教育与研究(CASER)小组培训项目,调查重症监护医生的认知情况以及镇痛和镇静培训的重要性。

方法

共有107名参与者学习了CASER在2020年6月至2021年6月举办的“重症患者的镇静、镇痛和意识评估”培训课程。回收有效问卷98份。问卷内容包括前言、学员基本信息、学员对镇痛和镇静评估重要性及相关指南的认识,以及专业测试题。

结果

所有受访者均为从事重症监护室工作的资深专业人员。共有92.86%的人认为镇痛和镇静治疗是重症监护室非常重要的组成部分,76.5%的人认为他们掌握了相关专业知识。然而,从客观角度评估受访者的相关专业理论和实践时,可以发现只有28.57%的受访者在具体病例分析场景中能够达到及格线。在参加培训前,42.86%的医务人员认为在重症监护室的日常工作中应该进行镇痛和镇静治疗评估;参加培训后,62.24%的医务人员认为有必要进行评估,并认为培训后有所提高。此外,69.4%的受访者肯定了在中国重症监护室联合承担镇痛和镇静任务的必要性和意义。

结论

本研究表明,中国大陆重症监护室的镇痛和镇静评估并不规范。提出了镇痛和镇静标准化培训的重要性和意义。因此成立的CASER工作组在未来的工作中还有很长的路要走。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8292/9945524/d0680cc8893b/fmed-10-1010964-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8292/9945524/6149188fa6c2/fmed-10-1010964-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8292/9945524/e6883c445230/fmed-10-1010964-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8292/9945524/d0680cc8893b/fmed-10-1010964-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8292/9945524/6149188fa6c2/fmed-10-1010964-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8292/9945524/e6883c445230/fmed-10-1010964-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8292/9945524/d0680cc8893b/fmed-10-1010964-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploration of teaching practice of analgesia and sedation in mainland China: CASER experience.中国大陆镇痛与镇静教学实践探索:中国镇痛镇静专家共识经验
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 8;10:1010964. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1010964. eCollection 2023.
2
Blended teaching mode based on small private online course and case-based learning in analgesia and sedation education in China: a comparison with an offline mode.基于小规模在线课程和案例学习的混合教学模式在中国的镇痛镇静教育中的应用:与线下模式的比较。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jan 4;24(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04839-4.
3
Staff education, regular sedation and analgesia quality feedback, and a sedation monitoring technology for improving sedation and analgesia quality for critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients: a cluster randomised trial.医护人员教育、常规镇静和镇痛质量反馈以及镇静监测技术可提高重症机械通气患者的镇静和镇痛质量:一项整群随机试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Oct;4(10):807-817. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30178-3. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
4
Exploratory survey of procedural sedation and analgesia practice in sample of New Zealand rural hospitals: existing guidelines do not support current rural practice.新西兰农村医院样本中程序性镇静和镇痛实践的探索性调查:现有指南不支持当前农村实践。
Rural Remote Health. 2021 Jan;21(1):6320. doi: 10.22605/RRH6320. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
5
[Current state of sedation, analgesia and blood glucose management in intensive care units of county hospitals: a multicenter cross-sectional survey in Guizhou Province of China].[县级医院重症监护病房镇静、镇痛及血糖管理的现状:中国贵州省多中心横断面调查]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Jan;31(1):108-111. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.01.021.
6
A gap existed between physicians' perceptions and performance of pain, agitation-sedation and delirium assessments in Chinese intensive care units.中国重症监护病房中,医生在疼痛、躁动-镇静和谵妄评估方面的认知与实际操作之间存在差距。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Feb 25;21(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01286-w.
7
A multicenter survey of Ontario intensive care unit nurses regarding the use of sedatives and analgesics for adults receiving mechanical ventilation.一项针对安大略省重症监护病房护士进行的多中心调查,内容涉及为接受机械通气的成人使用镇静剂和镇痛药的情况。
J Crit Care. 2007 Sep;22(3):191-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.11.006. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
8
Current practices of mobilization, analgesia, relaxants and sedation in Indian ICUs: A survey conducted by the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine.印度重症监护病房当前的动员、镇痛、使用松弛剂和镇静的做法:印度重症医学学会开展的一项调查
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014 Sep;18(9):575-84. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.140146.
9
A One-Day Prospective National Observational Study on Sedation-Analgesia of Patients with Brain Injury in French Intensive Care Units: The SEDA-BIP-ICU (Sedation-Analgesia in Brain Injury Patient in ICU) Study.一项为期一天的法国重症监护病房颅脑损伤患者镇静-镇痛的全国性前瞻性观察研究:SEDATION-ANALGESIA IN BRAIN INJURY PATIENT IN ICU(颅脑损伤患者 ICU 镇静-镇痛)研究。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Feb;36(1):266-278. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01298-x. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
10
Teaching sedation and analgesia with simulation.通过模拟进行镇静和镇痛教学。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2000;16(4):273-85. doi: 10.1023/a:1011422826240.

本文引用的文献

1
Pain and sedation management and monitoring in pediatric intensive care units across Europe: an ESPNIC survey.欧洲儿科重症监护病房的疼痛和镇静管理及监测:一项 ESPNIC 调查。
Crit Care. 2022 Mar 31;26(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03957-7.
2
Expert consensus on management of analgesia and sedation for patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019.2019年冠状病毒病重症患者镇痛和镇静管理的专家共识
Chin Med J (Engl). 2020 Sep 20;133(18):2186-2188. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001034.
3
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Consensus Statements About Pain Management in Critically Ill End-of-Life Patients: A Systematic Review.
临床实践指南和关于危重病终末期患者疼痛管理的共识声明:系统评价。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov;47(11):1619-1626. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003975.
4
[Current state of sedation, analgesia and blood glucose management in intensive care units of county hospitals: a multicenter cross-sectional survey in Guizhou Province of China].[县级医院重症监护病房镇静、镇痛及血糖管理的现状:中国贵州省多中心横断面调查]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Jan;31(1):108-111. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.01.021.
5
Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU.成人 ICU 患者疼痛、躁动/镇静、谵妄、活动减少、睡眠障碍预防与管理临床实践指南。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):e825-e873. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299.
6
National survey and point prevalence study of sedation practice in UK critical care.英国重症监护镇静实践的全国性调查与时点患病率研究
Crit Care. 2016 Oct 27;20(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1532-x.
7
Determinants of procedural pain intensity in the intensive care unit. The Europain® study.重症监护病房程序性疼痛强度的决定因素。Europain®研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Jan 1;189(1):39-47. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201306-1174OC.
8
Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit.成人重症监护病房疼痛、躁动和谵妄管理的临床实践指南。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Jan;41(1):263-306. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72.
9
Quality assurance and assessment in pain management.
Anesthesiol Clin. 2011 Mar;29(1):123-33. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2010.11.008. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
10
[Guideline for analgesia and sedation for patients in intensive care unit, China (2006)].
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Sep 1;44(17):1158-66.