• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

俄语句子理解测试:一种评估句法能力的工具。

Sentence comprehension test for Russian: A tool to assess syntactic competence.

作者信息

Chernova Daria, Novozhilov Artem, Slioussar Natalia

机构信息

Institute for Cognitive Studies, Saint Petersburg University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

School of Linguistics, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 10;14:1035961. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1035961. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1035961
PMID:36844341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9950636/
Abstract

Although all healthy adults have advanced syntactic processing abilities in their native language, psycholinguistic studies report extensive variation among them. However, very few tests were developed to assess this variation, presumably, because when adult native speakers on syntactic processing, by other tasks, they usually reach ceiling performance. We developed a Sentence Comprehension Test for the Russian language aimed to fill this gap. The test captures variation among participants and does not show ceiling effects. The Sentence Comprehension Test includes 60 unambiguous grammatically complex sentences and 40 control sentences that are of the same length, but are syntactically simpler. Every sentence is accompanied by a comprehension question targeting potential syntactic processing problems and interpretation errors associated with them. Grammatically complex sentences were selected on the basis of the previous literature and then tested in a pilot study. As a result, six constructions that trigger the largest number of errors were identified. For these constructions, we also analyzed which ones are associated with the longest word-by-word reading times, question answering times and the highest error rates. These differences point to different sources of syntactic processing difficulties and can be relied upon in subsequent studies. We conducted two experiments to validate the final version of the test. Getting similar results in two independent experiments, as well as in two presentation modes (reading and listening modes are compared in Experiment 2) confirms its reliability. In Experiment 1, we also showed that the results of the test correlate with the scores in the verbal working memory span test.

摘要

虽然所有健康的成年人在其母语中都具备高级句法处理能力,但心理语言学研究表明,他们之间存在广泛差异。然而,据推测,由于成年母语者在进行句法处理时,通过其他任务通常会达到上限表现,因此很少有测试被开发出来评估这种差异。我们开发了一种俄语句子理解测试,旨在填补这一空白。该测试能够捕捉参与者之间的差异,并且不会出现上限效应。句子理解测试包括60个明确无误的语法复杂句子和40个控制句子,这些控制句子长度相同,但句法更简单。每个句子都伴有一个理解问题,针对潜在的句法处理问题以及与之相关的解释错误。语法复杂句子是根据先前的文献选择的,然后在一项初步研究中进行测试。结果,确定了六种引发错误最多的结构。对于这些结构,我们还分析了哪些结构与逐词阅读时间最长、回答问题时间最长以及错误率最高相关。这些差异指出了句法处理困难的不同来源,可在后续研究中加以利用。我们进行了两项实验来验证测试的最终版本。在两个独立实验中以及在两种呈现模式下(实验2中比较了阅读和听力模式)获得相似结果,证实了其可靠性。在实验1中,我们还表明测试结果与言语工作记忆广度测试的分数相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b7d/9950636/7e75ee9354a4/fpsyg-14-1035961-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b7d/9950636/c3cb78f4a1c0/fpsyg-14-1035961-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b7d/9950636/7e75ee9354a4/fpsyg-14-1035961-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b7d/9950636/c3cb78f4a1c0/fpsyg-14-1035961-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b7d/9950636/7e75ee9354a4/fpsyg-14-1035961-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Sentence comprehension test for Russian: A tool to assess syntactic competence.俄语句子理解测试:一种评估句法能力的工具。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 10;14:1035961. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1035961. eCollection 2023.
2
The role of left temporo-parietal and inferior frontal cortex in comprehending syntactically complex sentences: A brain stimulation study.左颞顶叶和额下回皮质在理解句法复杂句子中的作用:一项脑刺激研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2023 Feb 10;180:108465. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108465. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
3
Processing Mechanisms in Hearing-Impaired Listeners: Evidence from Reaction Times and Sentence Interpretation.听力受损听众的处理机制:来自反应时间和句子理解的证据。
Ear Hear. 2016 Nov/Dec;37(6):e391-e401. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000339.
4
Effects of age, speed of processing, and working memory on comprehension of sentences with relative clauses.年龄、加工速度和工作记忆对关系从句句子理解的影响。
Psychol Aging. 2011 Jun;26(2):439-50. doi: 10.1037/a0021837.
5
Mechanisms underlying syntactic comprehension deficits in vascular aphasia: new evidence from self-paced listening.血管性失语症句法理解缺陷的潜在机制:来自自定步速听力的新证据。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2015;32(5):283-313. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2015.1058253. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
6
Plausibility and structural reanalysis in L1 and L2 sentence comprehension.第一语言和第二语言句子理解中的合理性与结构重新分析
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Feb;76(2):319-337. doi: 10.1177/17470218221092400. Epub 2022 May 13.
7
Children's verbal working memory: role of processing complexity in predicting spoken sentence comprehension.儿童言语工作记忆:加工复杂性在预测口语句子理解中的作用。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Jun;55(3):669-82. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0111). Epub 2012 Jan 5.
8
Sentence comprehensionin Parkinson's disease.帕金森病中的句子理解
Dement Neuropsychol. 2007 Oct-Dec;1(4):386-391. doi: 10.1590/S1980-57642008DN10400010.
9
Neural correlates of syntactic ambiguity in sentence comprehension for low and high span readers.低阅读跨度和高阅读跨度读者在句子理解中句法歧义的神经关联。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Nov;16(9):1562-75. doi: 10.1162/0898929042568479.
10
Remembering sentences is not all about memory: Convergent and discriminant validity of syntactic knowledge and its relationship with reading comprehension.记住句子不仅仅与记忆有关:句法知识的聚合和判别有效性及其与阅读理解的关系。
J Child Lang. 2022 Mar;49(2):349-365. doi: 10.1017/S0305000921000210. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Dictation and vocabulary knowledge tests for adult native Chinese readers.针对成年中文母语读者的听写和词汇知识测试。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Apr 22;57(5):151. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02669-4.
2
Eye-movement reveals word order effects on comparative sentences in older adults using a verb-final language.眼动研究揭示了使用动词后置语言的老年人在比较句中词序的影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 21;15:1335536. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1335536. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Expanding horizons of cross-linguistic research on reading: The Multilingual Eye-movement Corpus (MECO).拓展阅读跨语言研究的视野:多语言眼动语料库(MECO)。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Dec;54(6):2843-2863. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01772-6. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
2
Measuring Lexical Quality: The Role of Spelling Ability.衡量词汇质量:拼写能力的作用。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Dec;52(6):2257-2282. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01387-3.
3
Verbal Working Memory as Emergent from Language Comprehension and Production.作为从语言理解和产出中浮现的言语工作记忆。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Mar 12;14:68. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00068. eCollection 2020.
4
An Online Tool to Assess Sentence Comprehension in Teenagers at Risk for School Exclusion: Evidence From L2 Italian Students.一种评估有被学校开除风险的青少年句子理解能力的在线工具:来自以意大利语为第二语言学生的证据。
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 5;10:2417. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02417. eCollection 2019.
5
The understanding of complex syntax in children with Down syndrome.唐氏综合征患儿对复杂句法的理解
Wellcome Open Res. 2019 Feb 28;3:140. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14861.2. eCollection 2018.
6
No evidence for strategic nature of age-related slowing in sentence processing.没有证据表明句子处理中的与年龄相关的减速具有策略性。
Psychol Aging. 2018 Nov;33(7):1045-1059. doi: 10.1037/pag0000302.
7
Syntactic Complexity Effects of Russian Relative Clause Sentences in Children with and without Developmental Language Disorder.发育性语言障碍儿童与非发育性语言障碍儿童对俄语关系从句句子的句法复杂性影响
Lang Acquis. 2016;23(4):333-360. doi: 10.1080/10489223.2016.1179312. Epub 2016 May 16.
8
Tracking sentence comprehension: Test-retest reliability in people with aphasia and unimpaired adults.追踪句子理解:失语症患者和无语言障碍成年人的重测信度
J Neurolinguistics. 2016 Nov;40:98-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
9
Verb and sentence production and comprehension in aphasia: Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (NAVS).失语症中的动词及句子产出与理解:西北动词与句子评估(NAVS)
Aphasiology. 2012;26(10):1250-1277. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2012.693584.
10
Reading ability and print exposure: item response theory analysis of the author recognition test.阅读能力与印刷品接触:作者识别测试的项目反应理论分析
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Dec;47(4):1095-1109. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0534-3.