Balyan Rohit, Kumar Sachin, Lalitha K, Aneja Sanjeev, George Jai S
Maulana Azad Medical College DelhiI, India.
Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2023 Jan 14;29(1):32-40. doi: 10.2478/rjaic-2022-0005. eCollection 2022 Jul.
Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in susceptible patients can be unacceptably high (70-80% reported incidence). This study was designed to evaluate the effect of palonosetron and ondansetron in preventing PONV in high-risk patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.
In this randomised, controlled, double-blind trial, nonsmoking females 18-70 years and weighing 40-90 kg, scheduled for elective laparoscopic gynaecological surgeries, were enrolled into the ondansetron (Group A, n=65) or palonosetron (Group B, n=65) group. Palonosetron (1 mcg/kg 4) or ondansetron (0.1 mg/kg 4) were administered just before induction. Postoperatively, incidence of nausea, vomiting, PONV (scored on a scale of 0-3), need for rescue antiemetic, complete response, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects were evaluated for up to 48 h following surgery.
The overall PONV scores and postoperative nausea score during 0-2 h and 24-48 h were comparable, but PONV scores (P=0.023) and postoperative nausea scores (P=0.010) during 2-24 h were significantly lesser in Group B compared to Group A. There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative vomiting score or retching during 0-48 h. The amount of first-line rescue antiemetic used during 2-24 h was significantly higher in Group A (56%) than in Group B (31%) (P=0.012; P<0.05). Complete response to the drug during 2-24 h was significantly higher (P=0.023) in Group B (63%) compared to Group A (40%), whereas response was comparable during 0-2 h and 24-48 h. Both groups had comparable incidences of adverse effects and patient satisfaction scores.
Palonosetron has superior antinausea effect, less need of rescue antiemetics, and lesser incidence of total PONV in comparison to ondansetron during 2-24 h and comparable effect to ondansetron during the 0-2 h and 24-48 h postoperative periods in high-risk patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.
易感患者术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的发生率可能高得令人难以接受(报道的发生率为70 - 80%)。本研究旨在评估帕洛诺司琼和昂丹司琼在预防妇科腹腔镜手术高危患者PONV方面的效果。
在这项随机、对照、双盲试验中,将计划进行择期腹腔镜妇科手术、年龄18 - 70岁且体重40 - 90 kg的非吸烟女性纳入昂丹司琼组(A组,n = 65)或帕洛诺司琼组(B组,n = 65)。在诱导前即刻给予帕洛诺司琼(1 mcg/kg)或昂丹司琼(0.1 mg/kg)。术后,评估术后长达48小时内的恶心、呕吐、PONV发生率(采用0 - 3评分)、抢救性使用止吐药的需求、完全缓解情况、患者满意度及不良反应。
0 - 2小时和24 - 48小时内的总体PONV评分及术后恶心评分相当,但B组在2 - 24小时内的PONV评分(P = 0.023)和术后恶心评分(P = 0.010)显著低于A组。0 - 48小时内的术后呕吐评分或干呕情况无统计学显著差异。A组在2 - 24小时内使用的一线抢救性止吐药数量(56%)显著高于B组(31%)(P = 0.012;P < 0.05)。B组在2 - 24小时内对药物的完全缓解率(63%)显著高于A组(40%)(P = 0.023),而在0 - 2小时和24 - 48小时内缓解情况相当。两组的不良反应发生率和患者满意度评分相当。
在接受妇科腹腔镜手术的高危患者中,与昂丹司琼相比,帕洛诺司琼在术后2 - 24小时内具有更好的抗恶心效果、更少的抢救性止吐药需求及更低的总体PONV发生率,在术后0 - 2小时和24 - 48小时内与昂丹司琼效果相当。