Hamzehnejadi Yaser, Mangolian Shahrbabaki Parvin, Mahmoodabadi Mina, Dehghan Mahlagha
Nursing Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Department of Critical Care Nursing, Razi Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Kerman University of Medical Science, Kerman, Iran.
J Chiropr Med. 2023 Mar;22(1):60-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Aug 21.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of massage versus dry cupping in addition to routine care on hemodynamic parameters of cardiac patients in critical care units.
The present study was a parallel randomized controlled clinical trial that was conducted in the critical care units of Shafa Hospital in Kerman, Iran, from 2019 to 2020. Ninety eligible patients)aged 18-75 years, no cardiac arrest in the past 72 hours, no severe dyspnea, no fever, and no cardiac pacemaker) were divided into massage (n = 30), dry cupping (n = 30), and control (n = 30) groups using the stratified block randomization method. The massage group received routine care and a head and face massage for 3 consecutive nights from the second day of admission. The dry cupping group received routine care and dry cupping between the third cervical vertebra and the fourth thoracic vertebra for 3 consecutive nights. The control group received only routine care, which included daily visits by the attending physician, nursing care, and medication. Each intervention session was performed for 15 minutes. The data collection tools included the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics questionnaire and the hemodynamic parameters form (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and saturation of peripheral oxygen). The hemodynamic parameters were measured each night before and after the intervention.
The mean systolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation level showed no significant difference among the 3 groups. The mean diastolic blood pressure of the 3 groups varied significantly over time. The mean diastolic blood pressure of the massage group decreased significantly on the third day of intervention, while it did not change significantly in the 2 groups of dry cupping or control ( < .05).
According to the results of this study, dry cupping had no effect on regulating hemodynamic parameters, while only diastolic blood pressure was reduced significantly after massage on the third day of intervention. Therefore, our study did not show effects of massage and dry cupping on regulating hemodynamic parameters.
本研究旨在比较除常规护理外,按摩与干拔罐对重症监护病房心脏患者血流动力学参数的影响。
本研究为平行随机对照临床试验,于2019年至2020年在伊朗克尔曼沙法医院的重症监护病房进行。90名符合条件的患者(年龄18 - 75岁,过去72小时内无心脏骤停,无严重呼吸困难,无发热,无心脏起搏器)采用分层区组随机化方法分为按摩组(n = 30)、干拔罐组(n = 30)和对照组(n = 30)。按摩组从入院第二天起连续3晚接受常规护理及头面部按摩。干拔罐组连续3晚在第三颈椎和第四胸椎之间接受常规护理及干拔罐。对照组仅接受常规护理,包括主治医师每日查房、护理及药物治疗。每次干预 session 持续15分钟。数据收集工具包括社会人口学和临床特征问卷以及血流动力学参数表(收缩压、舒张压、心率、呼吸频率和外周血氧饱和度)。干预前后每晚测量血流动力学参数。
三组患者的平均收缩压、心率、呼吸频率和血氧饱和度水平无显著差异。三组的平均舒张压随时间变化差异显著。按摩组干预第三天的平均舒张压显著降低,而干拔罐组和对照组两组则无显著变化(< .05)。
根据本研究结果,干拔罐对调节血流动力学参数无影响,而按摩干预第三天后仅舒张压显著降低。因此,我们的研究未显示按摩和干拔罐对调节血流动力学参数有影响。