Jing Zenghui, Wang Xingzhi, Zhang Panpan, Huang Jinli, Jia Yuanyuan, Zhang Juan, Wu Huajie, Sun Xin
Department of Pediatrics, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Front Pediatr. 2023 Feb 8;11:1074429. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1074429. eCollection 2023.
The benefits of physical activity (PA) for asthmatic children were increasingly recognized, and as the design of studies on PA and asthma has become more refined in recent years, the latest evidence needed to be updated. We performed this meta-analysis to synthesize the evidence available from the last 10 years to update the effects of PA in asthmatic children.
A systematic search was conducted in three databases, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Randomized controlled trials were included, and two reviewers independently conducted the inclusion screening, data extraction, and bias assessment.
A total of 9 studies were included in this review after 3,919 articles screened. PA significantly improved the forced vital capacity (FVC) (MD 7.62; 95% CI: 3.46 to 11.78; < 0.001), and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF) (MD 10.39; 95% CI: 2.96 to 17.82; = 0.006) in lung function. There was no significant difference in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV) (MD 3.17; 95% CI: -2.82 to 9.15; = 0.30) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) (MD -1.74; 95% CI: -11.36 to 7.88; = 0.72). Also, PA significantly improved the quality of life as assessed by the Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (all items < 0.05).
This review suggested that PA could improve FVC, FEF, and quality of life in asthmatic children, but there was insufficient evidence of improvement in FEV and airway inflammation.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42022338984.
体育活动(PA)对哮喘儿童的益处日益得到认可,且近年来关于PA与哮喘的研究设计愈发精细,最新证据需要更新。我们开展此项荟萃分析,以综合过去10年可得的证据,更新PA对哮喘儿童的影响。
在三个数据库,即PubMed、科学网和考克兰图书馆进行系统检索。纳入随机对照试验,两名评审员独立进行纳入筛选、数据提取和偏倚评估。
在筛选的3919篇文章后,本综述共纳入9项研究。PA显著改善了肺功能中的用力肺活量(FVC)(平均差7.62;95%置信区间:3.46至11.78;P<0.001)以及用力肺活量25%至75%之间的用力呼气流量(FEF)(平均差10.39;95%置信区间:2.96至17.82;P = 0.006)。第一秒用力呼气量(FEV)(平均差3.17;95%置信区间:-2.82至9.15;P = 0.30)和呼出一氧化氮分数(FeNO)(平均差-1.74;95%置信区间:-11.36至7.88;P = 0.72)无显著差异。此外,通过儿童哮喘生活质量问卷评估,PA显著改善了生活质量(所有项目P<0.05)。
本综述表明,PA可改善哮喘儿童的FVC、FEF和生活质量,但FEV和气道炎症改善的证据不足。