National Health and Medical Research Council, Centre of Excellence in Treatable Traits, Newcastle, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia.
Eur Respir J. 2022 Dec 15;60(6). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00546-2022. Print 2022 Dec.
Physical inactivity is common in asthma and is recognised as an important modifiable risk for poor clinical outcomes such as impaired asthma control and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Despite evidence supporting the role of physical activity in reducing the risk of these outcomes, little is known about optimal interventions for increasing physical activity in those with severe disease. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of interventions in increasing physical activity in severe asthma.
MEDLINE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, PubMed, Informit, SPORTDiscus and Cochrane databases were searched up to September 2021 for physical activity-based intervention studies that assessed physical activity outcomes ( steps per day, time spent undertaking physical activity) in adults with severe asthma. Data on asthma-related ( asthma control) and health-related outcomes ( HRQoL) were assessed as secondary outcomes. The revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analyses synthesised data where possible.
Four randomised controlled trials (all 12 weeks in duration) including 176 adults with moderate-to-severe asthma were included. An increase in physical activity was reported with a moderate-vigorous intensity aerobic and resistance training intervention (steps per day and time spent undertaking physical activity), and an unsupervised pedometer-based intervention (steps per day). Meta-analyses showed that physical activity interventions had an overall positive effect on steps per day (mean difference (MD) 1588, 95% CI 399-2778; p0.009, I=23), asthma control (MD -0.65, 95% CI -0.95--0.35; p<0.0001, I=0%) and HRQoL (MD 0.56, 95% CI 0.10-1.01; p0.02, I=16%) compared to control.
While there is some evidence supporting the effectiveness of interventions in improving physical activity in adults with severe asthma, higher-quality, large-scale studies of longer duration are needed to determine the optimal intervention.
在哮喘中,身体活动不足很常见,并且被认为是影响临床结局(如哮喘控制不佳和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL))的重要可改变风险因素。尽管有证据支持身体活动在降低这些结局风险中的作用,但对于严重疾病患者增加身体活动的最佳干预措施知之甚少。本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了干预措施在增加严重哮喘患者身体活动中的有效性。
截至 2021 年 9 月,检索了 MEDLINE、护理与联合健康文献累积索引、Embase、PubMed、Informit、SPORTDiscus 和 Cochrane 数据库,以评估基于身体活动的干预研究,这些研究评估了严重哮喘成人的身体活动结果(步数/天,从事身体活动的时间)。评估了与哮喘相关(哮喘控制)和健康相关的结果(HRQoL)作为次要结果。使用修订后的 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。在可能的情况下,进行了随机效应荟萃分析以综合数据。
共纳入了 4 项随机对照试验(均持续 12 周),包括 176 名中重度哮喘成人。一项中等至高强度有氧运动和抗阻训练干预(步数/天和从事身体活动的时间)以及一项无人监督的计步器为基础的干预(步数/天)报告了身体活动的增加。荟萃分析显示,身体活动干预对步数/天(平均差异(MD)1588,95%CI 399-2778;p0.009,I=23)、哮喘控制(MD-0.65,95%CI-0.95--0.35;p<0.0001,I=0%)和 HRQoL(MD 0.56,95%CI 0.10-1.01;p0.02,I=16%)均有总体积极影响与对照组相比。
虽然有一些证据支持干预措施在提高严重哮喘成人身体活动方面的有效性,但需要进行更高质量、更大规模和更长时间的研究,以确定最佳干预措施。