• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者与医疗服务提供者之间的费用及经济负担沟通:一项定性系统评价与元整合分析

Communication of costs and financial burdens between cancer patients and healthcare providers: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.

作者信息

Kuang Yi, Zhang Tingting, Ma Yan, Zhu Zheng, So Winnie K W, Xing Weijie

机构信息

School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Fudan University Centre for Evidence-Based Nursing: A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2023 Feb 27;31(3):192. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07647-0.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-023-07647-0
PMID:36847898
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to synthesize qualitative research regarding communication of costs and financial burdens between patients and healthcare providers to provide evidence for the subsequent development of intervention programs.

METHODS

Studies published prior to 11 February 2023 were collected from electronic databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science, EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), and ProQuest. A checklist for qualitative research drawn from the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual was applied to assess the quality of the included studies. Meta-aggregation was performed to synthesize the findings of the included studies.

RESULTS

Four synthesized findings were derived from 15 studies: cost communication offered more benefits than drawbacks, and most patients were willing to engage in cost communication; cost communication has been implemented in clinical practice but continued to face shortcomings and barriers; an expected cost communication should take into account timing, location, personnel, personality, and content; healthcare providers required education, information, tools, standardized processes, and policy and organizational support to increase their ability to deliver cost communication.

CONCLUSIONS

Cost communication can help optimize decision-making and reduce the risk of financial difficulties, as has been widely recognized by patients and healthcare providers. However, a complete clinical practice plan to facilitate cost communication has not yet been created.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在综合关于患者与医疗服务提供者之间成本及经济负担沟通的定性研究,为后续干预项目的开展提供证据。

方法

从电子数据库中收集2023年2月11日前发表的研究,包括PubMed/MEDLINE、MEDLINE(Ovid)、科学网、EMBASE(Ovid)、CINAHL(EBSCO)和ProQuest。应用从乔安娜·布里格斯研究所审稿手册中提取的定性研究清单来评估纳入研究的质量。进行元聚合以综合纳入研究的结果。

结果

从15项研究中得出了四项综合结果:成本沟通利大于弊,大多数患者愿意参与成本沟通;成本沟通已在临床实践中实施,但仍面临不足和障碍;预期的成本沟通应考虑时间、地点、人员、个性和内容;医疗服务提供者需要教育、信息、工具、标准化流程以及政策和组织支持,以提高其进行成本沟通的能力。

结论

成本沟通有助于优化决策并降低经济困难风险,这已得到患者和医疗服务提供者的广泛认可。然而,尚未制定出完善的促进成本沟通的临床实践计划。

相似文献

1
Communication of costs and financial burdens between cancer patients and healthcare providers: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.癌症患者与医疗服务提供者之间的费用及经济负担沟通:一项定性系统评价与元整合分析
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Feb 27;31(3):192. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07647-0.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
4
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
5
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.计算机和其他电子戒烟辅助手段的有效性和成本效益:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(38):1-205, iii-v. doi: 10.3310/hta16380.
6
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
7
The effectiveness of patient navigation programs for adult cancer patients undergoing treatment: a systematic review.成人癌症患者治疗期间患者导航项目的有效性:一项系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):295-321. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2324.
8
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
9
The effectiveness of interventions to meet family needs of critically ill patients in an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review update.成人重症监护病房中满足重症患者家庭需求的干预措施的有效性:系统评价更新
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Mar;14(3):181-234. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2477.
10
School-based education programmes for the prevention of unintentional injuries in children and young people.针对儿童和青少年预防意外伤害的校本教育项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 27;12(12):CD010246. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010246.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer Care Affordability and the Healthcare Team: Expanding an Assessment of Clinical Perceptions and Attitudes in Nursing.癌症护理可负担性与医疗团队:拓展对护理临床认知和态度的评估
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2025 Jun 12;52(4):259-264. doi: 10.1188/25.ONF.259-264.
2
Preference for palliative care among low-income advanced cancer patients in Mainland China: a qualitative study.中国大陆低收入晚期癌症患者对姑息治疗的偏好:一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Apr 21;24(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01739-w.
3
The development and preliminary evaluation of a financial navigation program among patients with breast cancer in China.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical-Legal Partnerships Facilitate Patient-Provider Cost of Care Conversations: A Multisite Qualitative Study in the U.S.医疗法律伙伴关系促进医患成本的护理交流:美国的多地点定性研究
Clin Nurs Res. 2022 Nov;31(8):1500-1509. doi: 10.1177/10547738221120339. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
2
Physician-patient communication of costs and financial burden of cancer and its treatment: a systematic review of clinical guidelines.医患沟通癌症及其治疗的费用和经济负担:临床指南的系统评价。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Sep 16;21(1):1036. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08697-5.
3
Impact of Cost Conversation on Decision-Making Outcomes.
中国乳腺癌患者财务导航项目的开发与初步评估
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2025 Feb 17;12:100668. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100668. eCollection 2025 Dec.
4
The Financial Toxicity Experience of Patients with Colorectal Cancer During Chemotherapy: A Qualitative Study.结直肠癌患者化疗期间的经济毒性体验:一项定性研究
Curr Oncol. 2024 Dec 31;32(1):23. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32010023.
5
Financial Toxicity in Japanese Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Cross-Sectional Study.日本转移性肾细胞癌患者的经济毒性:一项横断面研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 16;16(10):1904. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101904.
6
Financial toxicity and its risk factors among patients with cancer in China: A nationwide multisite study.中国癌症患者的经济毒性及其危险因素:一项全国性多中心研究。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Mar 15;11(5):100443. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100443. eCollection 2024 May.
7
Interventions to Mitigate Financial Toxicity in Adult Patients with Cancer in the United States: A Scoping Review.美国减轻成年癌症患者财务毒性的干预措施:一项范围综述。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Feb 6;31(2):918-932. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31020068.
成本沟通对决策结果的影响。
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2021 Jun 12;5(4):802-810. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.05.006. eCollection 2021 Aug.
4
The Out-of-Pocket Cost Burden of Cancer Care-A Systematic Literature Review.癌症治疗的自付费用负担:系统文献回顾。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Mar 15;28(2):1216-1248. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28020117.
5
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
6
Assessment of Financial Toxicity Among Older Adults With Advanced Cancer.评估晚期癌症老年患者的财务毒性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2025810. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25810.
7
How, When, and With Whom Should Cost of Care Conversations Occur? Preferences of Two Distinct Cancer Survivor Groups.应当在何时、与何人进行医疗成本相关的对话?两个不同癌症幸存者群体的偏好。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Sep;16(9):e912-e921. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00726. Epub 2020 May 7.
8
Perspectives on the Costs of Cancer Care: A Survey of the American Society of Breast Surgeons.关于癌症护理成本的观点:美国乳腺外科学会的调查。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(10):3141-3151. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07594-3. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
9
Conversations About Financial Issues in Routine Oncology Practices: A Multicenter Study.常规肿瘤学实践中的财务问题对话:一项多中心研究。
J Oncol Pract. 2019 Aug;15(8):e690-e703. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00618. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
10
Perspectives on Conversations About Costs of Cancer Care of Breast Cancer Survivors and Cancer Center Staff: A Qualitative Study.关于乳腺癌幸存者和癌症中心工作人员讨论癌症治疗费用的观点:一项定性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 May 7;170(9_Suppl):S54-S61. doi: 10.7326/M18-2117.