• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Stakeholder perspectives on facilitators and barriers to implementing a zero-dollar copay program for chronic conditions study.利益相关者对实施慢性病零自付计划的促进因素和障碍的看法研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jan 6;23(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01278-5.
2
Value-based insurance design in Louisiana: Blue Cross Blue Shield's Zero Dollar Co-pay program.路易斯安那州的基于价值的保险设计:蓝十字蓝盾的零美元共付计划。
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Jun 1;26(6):e179-e183. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.43493.
3
Evaluation of increased adherence and cost savings of an employer value-based benefits program targeting generic antihyperlipidemic and antidiabetic medications.评估针对通用抗高血脂和抗糖尿病药物的雇主基于价值的福利计划的依从性提高和成本节约情况。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2014 Feb;20(2):141-50. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.2.141.
4
Evaluation of a program to improve diabetes care through intensified care management activities and diabetes medication copayment reduction.通过强化护理管理活动和降低糖尿病药物自付费用来改善糖尿病护理的项目评估。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 May;18(4):297-310. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.4.297.
5
Association of co-pay elimination with medication adherence and total cost.共付额取消与药物依从性和总费用的关联。
Am J Manag Care. 2021 Jun;27(6):249-254. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88664.
6
Actionable Real-World Evidence to Improve Health Outcomes and Reduce Medical Spending Among Risk-Stratified Patients with Diabetes.针对糖尿病风险分层患者,提供切实可行的真实世界证据,以改善健康结局并降低医疗支出。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Dec;25(12):1442-1452. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.12.1442.
7
Exploring Stakeholder Perspectives on the Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Digital Technologies for Heart Disease Diagnosis: Qualitative Study.探索利益相关者对实施心脏病诊断数字技术的障碍和促进因素的看法:定性研究
JMIR Cardio. 2025 Mar 5;9:e66464. doi: 10.2196/66464.
8
Adapting a Text Messaging Intervention to Improve Diabetes Medication Adherence in a Spanish-Speaking Population: Qualitative Study.调整短信干预措施以提高说西班牙语人群的糖尿病药物依从性:定性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 May 1;12:e66668. doi: 10.2196/66668.
9
Effectiveness and sustainability of a structured group-based educational program (MEDIHEALTH) in improving medication adherence among Malay patients with underlying type 2 diabetes mellitus in Sarawak State of Malaysia: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.一项结构化的基于小组的教育项目(MEDIHEALTH)在提高马来西亚砂拉越州患有2型糖尿病的马来患者用药依从性方面的有效性和可持续性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Jun 5;19(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2649-9.
10
Patients' and stakeholders' experiences of a personalized self-management SUPport program (P-SUP) for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or coronary heart disease: a qualitative process evaluation : Maximilian Scholl.患者和利益相关者对 2 型糖尿病和/或冠心病患者个性化自我管理支持计划(P-SUP)的体验:定性过程评价
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):2566. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20034-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Medication persistence and its impact on type 2 diabetes.药物维持治疗及其对 2 型糖尿病的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2024 Apr 1;30(4):e124-e134. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89534.
2
Built to last? Barriers and facilitators of healthcare program sustainability: a systematic integrative review.经久不衰?医疗保健计划可持续性的障碍和促进因素:系统综合评价。
Implement Sci. 2023 Nov 13;18(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01315-x.
3
Benefits and Challenges of Remote Patient Monitoring as Perceived by Health Care Practitioners: A Systematic Review.远程患者监测对医疗保健从业者的益处和挑战:系统评价。
Perm J. 2023 Dec 15;27(4):100-111. doi: 10.7812/TPP/23.022. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
4
Patient perceptions of copay card utilization and policies.患者对自付费用卡使用情况及政策的认知。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2023 Sep 7;11(1):2254586. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2023.2254586. eCollection 2023.
5
Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Interventions for Reducing Avoidable Hospital Readmission: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.实施减少可避免住院率干预措施的障碍和促进因素:系统评价定性研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7089. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7089. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
6
Towards an Implementation-STakeholder Engagement Model (I-STEM) for improving health and social care services.迈向实施利益相关者参与模型(I-STEM),以改善医疗保健服务。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1997-2012. doi: 10.1111/hex.13808. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
7
The Effects of Opt-out vs Opt-in Tobacco Treatment on Engagement, Cessation, and Costs: A Randomized Clinical Trial.选择退出与选择加入烟草治疗对参与度、戒烟和成本的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Apr 1;183(4):331-339. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.7170.
8
Association Between Copayment Amount and Filling of Medications for Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitors in Patients With Heart Failure.抗血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂的费用分担额与心力衰竭患者药物填充之间的关联。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Dec 20;11(24):e027662. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027662. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
9
The Impact of Reimbursement for Non-Face-to-Face Chronic Care Management on Health Utilization Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Louisiana.路易斯安那州 2 型糖尿病患者非面对面慢性护理管理报销对卫生利用的影响。
Value Health. 2023 May;26(5):676-684. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.09.002. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
10
Medication Adherence and Compliance: Recipe for Improving Patient Outcomes.药物依从性与顺应性:改善患者治疗效果的秘诀
Pharmacy (Basel). 2022 Aug 28;10(5):106. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy10050106.

利益相关者对实施慢性病零自付计划的促进因素和障碍的看法研究。

Stakeholder perspectives on facilitators and barriers to implementing a zero-dollar copay program for chronic conditions study.

作者信息

Winberg Debra, Nauman Elizabeth, Shi Lizheng, Mohundro Brice L, Louis Kelly, Price-Haywood Eboni G, Tang Tiange, Bazzano Alessandra N

机构信息

School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Celia Scott Weatherhead School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, 1440 Canal St, New Orleans, LA, 70112, United States of America.

Louisiana Public Health Institute, New Orleans, United States of America.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jan 6;23(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01278-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-024-01278-5
PMID:39762862
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11702045/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) remains a pressing public health concern. Despite advancements in antidiabetic medications, suboptimal medication adherence persists among many individuals with T2D, often due to the high cost of medications. To combat this issue, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana (Blue Cross) introduced the $0 Drug Copay (ZDC) program, providing $0 copays for select drugs. This study sought to explore barriers and facilitators to the successful implementation of Blue Cross's ZDC program (updated version).

METHODS

Focus group discussions and interviews were conducted with health plan leadership, health coaches and providers who participate in the health plan organization's healthcare quality improvement program. Focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews were conducted between October 2022 and July 2023. Discussion guides were developed collaboratively and tailored to each participant group. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using NVivo qualitative analysis software. A descriptive, qualitative analysis was conducted, resulting in the identification of seven codes and subsequent candidate themes.

RESULTS

In total, 15 participants were interviewed: 6 were Blue Cross administrators, 5 were health coaches and 4 were Quality Blue providers. Overall, participants had positive feedback on the ZDC program and perceived that it has significant benefits for patients and the health system but could be improved, and four themes related to implementation barriers and facilitators, effectiveness and potential areas of improvement were identified: (1) the ZDC program reduces friction for patients, prescribers and the health system; (2) the program is aligned with the values of health systems, insurers and providers, facilitating implementation success; (3) expanding coverage (drug classes and conditions) and education (for providers and patients) could maximize program benefits; and (4) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) did not negatively impact program administration because the $0 copay was programmed at the benefit level.

CONCLUSIONS

The ZDC program aligns goals and can benefit patients, providers and patients. The program can have the largest potential if it is expanded to include new medications and new conditions, and if there is more education for patients and providers. Regardless of challenges, reduced-copay programs have the potential to improve medication adherence, improve HbA1C control and improve overall health outcomes. Trial Registration This study was approved by the Tulane University Institutional Review Board, IRB #2020-1986.

摘要

背景

2型糖尿病(T2D)仍然是一个紧迫的公共卫生问题。尽管抗糖尿病药物有所进步,但许多T2D患者的药物依从性仍不理想,这通常是由于药物成本高昂。为了解决这个问题,路易斯安那州蓝十字蓝盾公司(蓝十字)推出了零药费共付(ZDC)计划,为选定药物提供零共付费用。本研究旨在探讨成功实施蓝十字ZDC计划(更新版)的障碍和促进因素。

方法

对参与健康计划组织医疗质量改进计划的健康计划领导层、健康教练和提供者进行了焦点小组讨论和访谈。焦点小组讨论和半结构化访谈于2022年10月至2023年7月进行。讨论指南是共同制定的,并针对每个参与群体进行了调整。访谈进行了录音、转录,并使用NVivo定性分析软件进行了分析。进行了描述性定性分析,确定了七个编码和随后的候选主题。

结果

总共采访了15名参与者:6名是蓝十字管理人员,5名是健康教练,4名是优质蓝十字提供者。总体而言,参与者对ZDC计划给予了积极反馈,并认为该计划对患者和卫生系统有显著益处,但仍有改进空间,确定了与实施障碍和促进因素、有效性及潜在改进领域相关的四个主题:(1)ZDC计划减少了患者、开处方者和卫生系统的阻力;(2)该计划与卫生系统、保险公司和提供者的价值观一致,促进了实施的成功;(3)扩大覆盖范围(药物类别和病症)和教育(针对提供者和患者)可以使计划效益最大化;(4)2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)对计划管理没有负面影响,因为零共付费用是在福利层面设定的。

结论

ZDC计划目标一致,对患者、提供者和卫生系统都有益处。如果该计划扩大到包括新药物和新病症,并且对患者和提供者进行更多教育,其潜力将最大。无论面临何种挑战,降低共付费用计划都有可能提高药物依从性、改善糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)控制并改善整体健康结果。试验注册 本研究获得了杜兰大学机构审查委员会的批准,IRB编号为#2020-1986。