• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估三个明尼苏达州社区中基于社区的干预措施对高血压和糖尿病管理的影响:来自美国 HealthRise 项目的前瞻性评估结果。

Assessing the impact of community-based interventions on hypertension and diabetes management in three Minnesota communities: Findings from the prospective evaluation of US HealthRise programs.

机构信息

Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Department of Health Metrics Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Feb 27;18(2):e0279230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279230. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0279230
PMID:36848352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9970068/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Community-based health interventions are increasingly viewed as models of care that can bridge healthcare gaps experienced by underserved communities in the United States (US). With this study, we sought to assess the impact of such interventions, as implemented through the US HealthRise program, on hypertension and diabetes among underserved communities in Hennepin, Ramsey, and Rice Counties, Minnesota.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

HealthRise patient data from June 2016 to October 2018 were assessed relative to comparison patients in a difference-in-difference analysis, quantifying program impact on reducing systolic blood pressure (SBP) and hemoglobin A1c, as well as meeting clinical targets (< 140 mmHg for hypertension, < 8% Al1c for diabetes), beyond routine care. For hypertension, HealthRise participation was associated with SBP reductions in Rice (6.9 mmHg [95% confidence interval: 0.9-12.9]) and higher clinical target achievement in Hennepin (27.3 percentage-points [9.8-44.9]) and Rice (17.1 percentage-points [0.9 to 33.3]). For diabetes, HealthRise was associated with A1c decreases in Ramsey (1.3 [0.4-2.2]). Qualitative data showed the value of home visits alongside clinic-based services; however, challenges remained, including community health worker retention and program sustainability.

CONCLUSIONS

HealthRise participation had positive effects on improving hypertension and diabetes outcomes at some sites. While community-based health programs can help bridge healthcare gaps, they alone cannot fully address structural inequalities experienced by many underserved communities.

摘要

背景

社区为基础的健康干预措施正日益被视为一种护理模式,可以弥合美国(美国)服务不足社区所经历的医疗保健差距。通过这项研究,我们试图评估通过美国 HealthRise 计划实施的此类干预措施对明尼苏达州亨内平县、拉姆齐县和赖斯县服务不足社区的高血压和糖尿病的影响。

方法和发现

使用差异分析评估了 2016 年 6 月至 2018 年 10 月期间 HealthRise 患者的数据,与常规护理相比,量化了该计划在降低收缩压(SBP)和血红蛋白 A1c 以及达到临床目标(高血压<140mmHg,糖尿病<8%Al1c)方面的效果。对于高血压,参与 HealthRise 计划与赖斯县的 SBP 降低相关(6.9mmHg [95%置信区间:0.9-12.9]),而亨内平县和赖斯县的临床目标达标率更高(27.3 个百分点 [9.8-44.9])和赖斯县(17.1 个百分点 [0.9 到 33.3])。对于糖尿病,HealthRise 与 Ramsey 县的 A1c 降低相关(1.3 [0.4-2.2])。定性数据表明,家庭访视与诊所服务相结合具有价值;然而,仍然存在挑战,包括社区卫生工作者的留用和计划的可持续性。

结论

HealthRise 计划的参与对一些地点改善高血压和糖尿病的结果有积极影响。虽然社区为基础的健康计划可以帮助弥合医疗保健差距,但它们本身并不能完全解决许多服务不足社区所经历的结构性不平等问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/948f/9970068/46d9fd5cc004/pone.0279230.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/948f/9970068/46d9fd5cc004/pone.0279230.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/948f/9970068/46d9fd5cc004/pone.0279230.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the impact of community-based interventions on hypertension and diabetes management in three Minnesota communities: Findings from the prospective evaluation of US HealthRise programs.评估三个明尼苏达州社区中基于社区的干预措施对高血压和糖尿病管理的影响:来自美国 HealthRise 项目的前瞻性评估结果。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 27;18(2):e0279230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279230. eCollection 2023.
2
Community-based interventions for detection and management of diabetes and hypertension in underserved communities: a mixed-methods evaluation in Brazil, India, South Africa and the USA.在资源匮乏社区中开展基于社区的糖尿病和高血压检测与管理干预措施:在巴西、印度、南非和美国开展的一项混合方法评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jun;5(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001959.
3
Community Health Worker Program Outcomes for Diabetes and Hypertension Control in West Bank Refugee Camps: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.社区卫生工作者计划对约旦河西岸难民营糖尿病和高血压控制的影响:一项回顾性匹配队列研究。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022 Oct 31;10(5). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00168.
4
Changes in blood pressure among users of lay health worker or volunteer operated community-based blood pressure programs over time: a systematic review protocol.随着时间推移,由非专业卫生工作者或志愿者运营的社区血压项目使用者的血压变化:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):30-40. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1927.
5
Identifying gaps in the continuum of care for cardiovascular disease and diabetes in two communities in South Africa: Baseline findings from the HealthRise project.识别南非两个社区心血管疾病和糖尿病连续护理中的差距:HealthRise 项目的基线结果。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 14;13(3):e0192603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192603. eCollection 2018.
6
The ACTIVATE Digital Health Pilot Program for Diabetes and Hypertension in an Underserved and Rural Community.在一个服务不足和农村社区中开展的 ACTIVATE 糖尿病和高血压数字健康试点计划。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Aug;14(4):644-653. doi: 10.1055/a-2096-0326. Epub 2023 May 18.
7
Observational stepped-wedge analysis of a community health worker-led intervention for diabetes and hypertension in rural Mexico.观察性社区卫生工作者主导的糖尿病和高血压干预在墨西哥农村的递进式楔形分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 8;10(3):e034749. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034749.
8
The impact of point of care testing on diabetes services along Victoria's Mallee Track: results of a community-based diabetes risk assessment and management program.即时检验对维多利亚州马勒地区糖尿病服务的影响:一项基于社区的糖尿病风险评估与管理项目的结果
Rural Remote Health. 2005 Jul-Sep;5(3):371. Epub 2005 Jul 15.
9
Improving diabetes care of community-dwelling underserved older adults.改善社区居住的服务不足的老年糖尿病患者的护理。
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2022 Oct 1;34(10):1156-1166. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000773.
10
Meta-analysis: chronic disease self-management programs for older adults.荟萃分析:针对老年人的慢性病自我管理项目
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Sep 20;143(6):427-38. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-6-200509200-00007.

引用本文的文献

1
Mathematical Modelling for Community Based Intervention for Managing Diabetes: A Systematic Literature Review.基于社区干预管理糖尿病的数学建模:一项系统文献综述
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 May 1;18:2429-2440. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S510753. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluation of a peer support group programme for vulnerable host population and refugees living with diabetes and/or hypertension in Lebanon: a before-after study.黎巴嫩针对糖尿病和/或高血压易感人群及难民的同伴支持小组项目评估:一项前后对照研究。
Confl Health. 2025 Jan 29;19(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13031-025-00646-4.
3
People and sites as community resources for preventing and managing chronic health conditions: A conceptual analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Updated Guidance on the Reporting of Race and Ethnicity in Medical and Science Journals.医学与科学期刊中种族与民族报告的更新指南。
JAMA. 2021 Aug 17;326(7):621-627. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.13304.
2
Community-based interventions for detection and management of diabetes and hypertension in underserved communities: a mixed-methods evaluation in Brazil, India, South Africa and the USA.在资源匮乏社区中开展基于社区的糖尿病和高血压检测与管理干预措施:在巴西、印度、南非和美国开展的一项混合方法评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jun;5(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001959.
3
At the Heart of the Matter: Unmasking and Addressing the Toll of COVID-19 on Diverse Populations.
作为预防和管理慢性健康状况的社区资源的人员和场所:一项概念分析。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jul 26;4(7):e0003415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003415. eCollection 2024.
问题的核心:揭示并应对新冠疫情对不同人群造成的伤害。
Circulation. 2020 Jul 14;142(2):105-107. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048126. Epub 2020 May 4.
4
COVID-19 exacerbating inequalities in the US.新冠疫情加剧美国的不平等现象。
Lancet. 2020 Apr 18;395(10232):1243-1244. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30893-X.
5
Effect of Community Health Worker Support on Clinical Outcomes of Low-Income Patients Across Primary Care Facilities: A Randomized Clinical Trial.社区卫生工作者支持对初级保健机构中低收入患者临床结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1635-1643. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4630.
6
The State of US Health, 1990-2016: Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Among US States.《1990 - 2016年美国健康状况:美国各州的疾病、伤害及风险因素负担》
JAMA. 2018 Apr 10;319(14):1444-1472. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0158.
7
Community Health Worker Support for Disadvantaged Patients With Multiple Chronic Diseases: A Randomized Clinical Trial.社区卫生工作者对患有多种慢性病的弱势患者的支持:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Public Health. 2017 Oct;107(10):1660-1667. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303985. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
8
Identifying High-Risk Neighborhoods Using Electronic Medical Records: A Population-Based Approach for Targeting Diabetes Prevention and Treatment Interventions.利用电子病历识别高危社区:一种基于人群的糖尿病预防和治疗干预目标设定方法。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 27;11(7):e0159227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159227. eCollection 2016.
9
Effects of Community-Based Health Worker Interventions to Improve Chronic Disease Management and Care Among Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review.基于社区的卫生工作者干预措施对改善弱势群体慢性病管理与照护的影响:一项系统综述
Am J Public Health. 2016 Apr;106(4):e3-e28. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302987. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
10
Community health workers: part of the solution.社区卫生工作者:解决方案的一部分。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jul;29(7):1338-42. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0081.