• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 疫苗选择的政治成分:一项联合实验的结果。

The political component of COVID-19 vaccine choice: Results from a conjoint experiment.

机构信息

Centre for Social Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.

Doctoral School of International Relations and Political Science, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Public Health. 2023 Apr;217:33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.01.014. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2023.01.014
PMID:36848795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9868381/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Prior research highlights the role of efficacy, vaccine safety, and availability in vaccine hesitancy. Research is needed to better understand the political driving forces behind COVID-19 vaccine uptake. We examine the effects of the origin of a vaccine, and approval status within the EU on vaccine choice. We also test if these effects differ by party affiliation among Hungarians.

STUDY DESIGN

We use a conjoint experimental design to assess multiple causal relationships. Respondents choose between two hypothetical vaccine profiles randomly generated from 10 attributes. The data were gathered from an online panel in September 2022. We applied a quota for vaccination status and party preference. Three hundred twenty-four respondents evaluated 3888 randomly generated vaccine profiles.

METHODS

We analyse the data using an OLS estimator with standard errors clustered by respondents. To further nuance our results, we test for task, profile, and treatment heterogeneity effects.

RESULTS

By origin, respondents prefer German (MM 0.55; 95% CI 0.52-0.58) and Hungarian (0.55; 0.52-0.59) vaccines over US (0.49; 0.45-0.52) and Chinese vaccines (0.44; 0.41-0.47). By approval status, vaccines approved by the EU (0.55, 0.52-0.57) or pending authorization (0.5, 0.48-0.53) are preferred over unauthorised ones (0.45, 0.43-0.47). Both effects are conditional on party affiliation. Government voters especially prefer Hungarian vaccines (0.6; 0.55-0.65) over others.

CONCLUSIONS

The complexity of vaccination decisions calls for the usage of information shortcuts. Our findings demonstrate a strong political component that motivates vaccine choice. We demonstrate that politics and ideology have broken into fields of individual-level decisions such as health.

摘要

目的

先前的研究强调了疗效、疫苗安全性和可及性在疫苗犹豫中的作用。需要研究更好地了解 COVID-19 疫苗接种背后的政治驱动因素。我们研究了疫苗的起源和在欧盟的批准状态对疫苗选择的影响。我们还测试了这些影响是否因匈牙利人的党派关系而不同。

研究设计

我们使用联合实验设计来评估多种因果关系。受访者从 10 个属性中随机生成的两个假设疫苗特征中进行选择。数据是 2022 年 9 月从在线小组中收集的。我们对疫苗接种状况和党派偏好进行了配额限制。324 名受访者评估了 3888 个随机生成的疫苗特征。

方法

我们使用 OLS 估计器和按受访者聚类的标准误差来分析数据。为了进一步细化我们的结果,我们测试了任务、特征和处理异质性的影响。

结果

按起源划分,受访者更喜欢德国(MM0.55;95%CI0.52-0.58)和匈牙利(0.55;0.52-0.59)疫苗,而不是美国(0.49;0.45-0.52)和中国疫苗(0.44;0.41-0.47)。按批准状态,欧盟批准(0.55,0.52-0.57)或待授权(0.5,0.48-0.53)的疫苗优于未授权的疫苗(0.45,0.43-0.47)。这两种效果都取决于党派关系。政府选民特别喜欢匈牙利疫苗(0.6;0.55-0.65)。

结论

接种决策的复杂性需要使用信息捷径。我们的研究结果表明,有一个强烈的政治因素推动了疫苗选择。我们表明,政治和意识形态已经进入个人决策领域,如健康。

相似文献

1
The political component of COVID-19 vaccine choice: Results from a conjoint experiment.COVID-19 疫苗选择的政治成分:一项联合实验的结果。
Public Health. 2023 Apr;217:33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.01.014. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
2
Factors Associated With US Adults' Likelihood of Accepting COVID-19 Vaccination.与美国成年人接受 COVID-19 疫苗意愿相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2025594. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25594.
3
A Discrete Choice Analysis Comparing COVID-19 Vaccination Decisions for Children and Adults.儿童和成人的 COVID-19 疫苗接种决策的离散选择分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2253582. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53582.
4
Associations between COVID-19 vaccine uptake, race/ethnicity, and political party affiliation.新冠疫苗接种、种族/民族和政党从属之间的关联。
J Behav Med. 2023 Jun;46(3):525-531. doi: 10.1007/s10865-022-00379-2. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
5
Politics matters for individual attitudes toward vaccine donation: cross-national evidence from the United States and Taiwan.政治因素影响个人对疫苗捐赠的态度:来自美国和中国台湾的跨国证据。
Global Health. 2023 Jun 20;19(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00940-x.
6
The politics of vaccination: a closer look at the beliefs, social norms, and prevention behaviors related to COVID-19 vaccine uptake within two US political parties.疫苗接种的政治学:深入观察美国两党中与 COVID-19 疫苗接种相关的信仰、社会规范和预防行为。
Psychol Health Med. 2024 Mar;29(3):589-602. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2023.2283401. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
7
The pervasive association between political ideology and COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Brazil: an ecologic study.政治意识形态与巴西 COVID-19 疫苗接种率之间的普遍关联:一项生态学研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 23;23(1):1606. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16409-w.
8
Influence of Vaccination Characteristics on COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance Among Working-Age People in Hong Kong, China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.接种特征对中国香港工作年龄段人群对 COVID-19 疫苗接受度的影响:一项离散选择实验。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 10;9:793533. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.793533. eCollection 2021.
9
When to be vaccinated? What to consider? Modelling decision-making and time preference for COVID-19 vaccine through a conjoint experiment.何时接种疫苗?需要考虑哪些因素?通过联合实验对 COVID-19 疫苗接种决策和时间偏好进行建模。
Vaccine. 2023 Oct 6;41(42):6300-6308. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.08.068. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
10
The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在英国和美国,针对成年人的 COVID-19 疫苗副作用风险的描述和沟通对疫苗接种意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05484-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Ideology and COVID-19 Vaccination Intention: Perceptual Mediators and Communication Moderators.意识形态与 COVID-19 疫苗接种意愿:感知中介和沟通调节因素。
J Health Commun. 2022 Jun 3;27(6):416-426. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2022.2117438. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
2
Vaccine nationalism among the public: A cross-country experimental evidence of own-country bias towards COVID-19 vaccination.公众中的疫苗民族主义:对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的本国偏见的跨国实验证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Oct;310:115278. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115278. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
3
Understanding hesitancy with revealed preferences across COVID-19 vaccine types.
理解 COVID-19 疫苗类型之间的显示偏好犹豫。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 2;12(1):13293. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15633-5.
4
Two-Tailed Dogs, Social Unrest and COVID-19 Vaccination: Politics, Hesitancy and Vaccine Choice in Hungary and Thailand.双头犬、社会动荡与新冠疫苗接种:匈牙利和泰国的政治、犹豫态度与疫苗选择
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 May 16;10(5):789. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10050789.
5
The roots of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: evidence from Hungary.对 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫的根源:来自匈牙利的证据。
J Behav Med. 2023 Apr;46(1-2):185-200. doi: 10.1007/s10865-022-00314-5. Epub 2022 May 14.
6
Which vaccine attributes foster vaccine uptake? A cross-country conjoint experiment.哪些疫苗属性促进疫苗接种?一项跨国联合实验。
PLoS One. 2022 May 4;17(5):e0266003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266003. eCollection 2022.
7
COVID-19 in Europe: new challenges for addressing vaccine hesitancy.欧洲的新冠疫情:应对疫苗犹豫问题的新挑战。
Lancet. 2022 Feb 19;399(10326):699-701. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00150-7. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
8
Barriers to COVID-19 vaccination among medical students in Kazakhstan: development, validation, and use of a new COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Scale.哈萨克斯坦医学生对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的障碍:新的 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫量表的开发、验证和使用。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Dec 2;17(12):4982-4992. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1982280. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
9
Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy: a cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia.COVID-19 疫苗接受度和犹豫的决定因素:沙特阿拉伯的一项横断面研究。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Nov 2;17(11):4015-4020. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1950506. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
10
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: misinformation and perceptions of vaccine safety.COVID-19 疫苗犹豫:疫苗安全性的错误信息和认知。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Dec 31;18(1):1950504. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1950504. Epub 2021 Jul 30.