• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较经肛门多普勒引导痔动脉结扎术联合直肠阴道修复术与传统外切术治疗 3、4 度痔的疗效。

Comparison Of Outcome Between Open Haemorrhoidectomy Versus Trans-Anal Doppler Guided Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation With Recto-Anal Repair In 3rd And 4th Degree Haemorrhoids.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Mayo Hospital Lahore.

Department of Surgery, King Edward Medical College Lahore-Pakistan.

出版信息

J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2023 Feb-Mar;35(1):95-98.

PMID:36849385
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Haemorrhoids are very common but their exact prevalence is not known as most of the people suffering from them do not seek medical or surgical advice. The literature states their prevalence to be about 39% and commonly affect people aged between 45-65 years of age. Objective of the study was to compare the outcomes of open haemorrhoidectomy Vs Trans anal Doppler ultrasound guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with recto-anal repair in 3rd and 4th degree haemorrhoids. It was a Randomized control trial, conducted at the Department of Surgery, King Edward Medical University, Lahore; from October 2019 to March 2021.

METHODS

This was a randomized control trial study where the results of 70 patients of haemorrhoids including 3rd and 4th degree disease fulfilling the selection criteria, who underwent open haemorrhoidectomy (OH) and Doppler guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation with rectoanal repair (HAL RAR) procedure on elective and emergency operating lists, were analyzed with regards to post-operative pain, bleeding and hospital stay.

RESULTS

From our seventy patients the minimum age was 23 and maximum age limit was 55 years (mean: 35.09±7.47). There were 49 (70%) males and 21 (30%) females. Mean post-op pain on day 7 for OH was 1.12±0.72 and for HAL RAR it was 1.06±0.52. Post-op bleeding (POB) occurred in 4 (10%) patients in OH group and 2(6.66%) patients in HAL RAR group. Mean hospital stay for OH group was 2±0.45 and for HAL RAR it was 1.20±0.40, for POB, it was 1.9±0.30 in OH group and 1.86±0.34 in HAL-RAR group.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in mean post-op pain on day seven, and post-op bleeding, but there was significant difference in terms of mean hospital stay between the two groups.

摘要

背景

痔疮非常常见,但由于大多数患者没有寻求医疗或手术建议,因此其确切患病率尚不清楚。文献报道其患病率约为 39%,常见于 45-65 岁人群。本研究的目的是比较开放式痔切除术与经肛门多普勒超声引导痔动脉结扎联合直肠肛门修复术治疗 3 度和 4 度痔的疗效。这是一项在拉合尔爱德华国王医科大学外科系进行的随机对照试验,时间为 2019 年 10 月至 2021 年 3 月。

方法

这是一项随机对照试验研究,对符合选择标准的 70 例痔病患者(包括 3 度和 4 度疾病)的手术结果进行了分析,这些患者在选择性和紧急手术清单上接受了开放式痔切除术(OH)和经肛门多普勒超声引导痔动脉结扎联合直肠肛门修复术(HAL RAR)治疗,分析了术后疼痛、出血和住院时间。

结果

在我们的 70 名患者中,最小年龄为 23 岁,最大年龄为 55 岁(平均:35.09±7.47)。男性 49 例(70%),女性 21 例(30%)。OH 组术后第 7 天的平均术后疼痛为 1.12±0.72,HAL RAR 组为 1.06±0.52。OH 组有 4 例(10%)患者出现术后出血(POB),HAL RAR 组有 2 例(6.66%)患者出现 POB。OH 组的平均住院时间为 2±0.45,HAL RAR 组为 1.20±0.40,POB 组为 1.9±0.30,HAL-RAR 组为 1.86±0.34。

结论

两组患者术后第 7 天的平均术后疼痛和术后出血无显著差异,但平均住院时间有显著差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison Of Outcome Between Open Haemorrhoidectomy Versus Trans-Anal Doppler Guided Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation With Recto-Anal Repair In 3rd And 4th Degree Haemorrhoids.比较经肛门多普勒引导痔动脉结扎术联合直肠阴道修复术与传统外切术治疗 3、4 度痔的疗效。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2023 Feb-Mar;35(1):95-98.
2
Haemorrhoidal artery ligation: Is Doppler guidance useful? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.痔动脉结扎术:多普勒引导是否有用?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jul;27(7):e70163. doi: 10.1111/codi.70163.
3
Stapled haemorrhoidectomy (haemorrhoidopexy) for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a systematic review and economic evaluation.吻合器痔切除术(痔固定术)治疗痔疮:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Apr;12(8):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-193. doi: 10.3310/hta12080.
4
Interventional treatments for prolapsing haemorrhoids: network meta-analysis.介入治疗痔脱垂:网状荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2021 Sep 6;5(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab091.
5
The comparison of doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation and the tissue selecting technique for patients with grade III/IV haemorrhoids: a retrospective cohort study.多普勒引导下痔动脉结扎术与组织选择技术治疗Ⅲ/Ⅳ度痔的比较:一项回顾性队列研究
Updates Surg. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02202-4.
6
Coblation versus other surgical techniques for tonsillectomy.用于扁桃体切除术的低温等离子消融术与其他手术技术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 22;8(8):CD004619. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004619.pub3.
7
Interventions for preventing postpartum constipation.预防产后便秘的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 18;2015(9):CD011625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011625.pub2.
8
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 4;7(7):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub3.
9
Rubber band ligation versus haemorrhoidectomy for the treatment of grade II-III haemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.橡皮圈套扎术与痔切除术治疗Ⅱ-Ⅲ度痔疮的疗效比较:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Jun;25(6):663-674. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02430-x. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
10
Post-hemorrhoidectomy pain: can surgeons reduce it? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.痔切除术后疼痛:外科医生能否减轻?一项随机试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Dec;36(12):2553-2566. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-04013-6. Epub 2021 Aug 20.