Dekker L, Han-Geurts I J M, Rørvik H D, van Dieren S, Bemelman W A
Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, Proctos Clinic, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Jun;25(6):663-674. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02430-x. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
The aim of this study was to review clinical outcome of haemorrhoidectomy and rubber band ligation in grade II-III haemorrhoids.
A systematic review was conducted. Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrials.gov, and the WHO International Trial Registry Platform were searched, from inception until May 2018, to identify randomised clinical trials comparing rubber band ligation with haemorrhoidectomy for grade II-III haemorrhoids. The primary outcome was control of symptoms. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, postoperative complications, anal continence, patient satisfaction, quality of life and healthcare costs were assessed. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed.
Three hundred and twenty-four studies were identified. Eight trials met the inclusion criteria. All trials were of moderate methodological quality. Outcome measures were diverse and not clearly defined. Control of symptoms was better following haemorrhoidectomy. Patients had less pain after rubber band ligation. There were more complications (bleeding, urinary retention, anal incontinence/stenosis) in the haemorrhoidectomy group. Patient satisfaction was equal in both groups. There were no data on quality of life and healthcare costs except that in one study patients resumed work more early after rubber band ligation.
Haemorrhoidectomy seems to provide better symptom control but at the cost of more pain and complications. However, due to the poor quality of the studies analysed/it is not possible to determine which of the two procedures provides the best treatment for grade II-III haemorrhoids. Further studies focusing on clearly defined outcome measurements taking patients perspective and economic impact into consideration are required.
本研究旨在回顾II - III度痔疮行痔切除术和橡皮圈套扎术的临床结局。
进行了一项系统评价。检索了Medline、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、Clinicaltrials.gov以及世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台,检索时间从建库至2018年5月,以确定比较II - III度痔疮橡皮圈套扎术与痔切除术的随机临床试验。主要结局是症状控制。次要结局包括术后疼痛、术后并发症、肛门节制、患者满意度、生活质量和医疗费用进行评估。遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。
共识别出324项研究。8项试验符合纳入标准。所有试验的方法学质量中等。结局指标多样且定义不明确。痔切除术后症状控制更好。橡皮圈套扎术后患者疼痛较轻。痔切除术组并发症(出血、尿潴留、肛门失禁/狭窄)更多。两组患者满意度相当。除一项研究表明橡皮圈套扎术后患者恢复工作更早外,没有关于生活质量和医疗费用的数据。
痔切除术似乎能更好地控制症状,但代价是疼痛和并发症更多。然而,由于所分析研究质量较差,无法确定这两种手术哪种对II - III度痔疮提供最佳治疗。需要进一步开展关注明确结局指标测量、考虑患者观点和经济影响的研究。