• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

介入治疗痔脱垂:网状荟萃分析。

Interventional treatments for prolapsing haemorrhoids: network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, South Auckland Clinical Campus, University of Auckland, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2021 Sep 6;5(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab091.

DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrab091
PMID:34633439
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8504447/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple treatments for early-moderate grade symptomatic haemorrhoids currently exist, each associated with their respective efficacy, complications, and risks. The aim of this study was to compare the relative clinical outcomes and effectiveness of interventional treatments for grade II-III haemorrhoids.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA criteria for all the RCTs published between 1980 and 2020; manuscripts were identified using the MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases. Inclusion criteria were RCTs comparing procedural interventions for grade II-III haemorrhoids. Primary outcomes of interest were: symptom recurrence at a minimum follow-up of 6 weeks, postprocedural pain measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) on day 1, and postprocedural complications (bleeding, urinary retention, and bowel incontinence). After bias assessment and heterogeneity analysis, a Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine RCTs were identified, including 9232 patients. Fourteen different treatments were analysed in the network meta-analysis. Overall, there were 59 RCTs (73 per cent) judged as being at high risk of bias, and the greatest risk was in the domain measurement of outcome. Variable amounts of heterogeneity were detected in direct treatment comparisons, in particular for symptom recurrence and postprocedural pain. Recurrence of haemorrhoidal symptoms was reported by 54 studies, involving 7026 patients and 14 treatments. Closed haemorrhoidectomy had the lowest recurrence risk, followed by open haemorrhoidectomy, suture ligation with mucopexy, stapled haemorrhoidopexy, and Doppler-guided haemorrhoid artery ligation (DG-HAL) with mucopexy. Pain was reported in 34 studies involving 3812 patients and 11 treatments. Direct current electrotherapy, DG-HAL with mucopexy, and infrared coagulation yielded the lowest pain scores. Postprocedural bleeding was recorded in 46 studies involving 5696 patients and 14 treatments. Open haemorrhoidectomy had the greatest risk of postprocedural bleeding, followed by stapled haemorrhoidopexy and closed haemorrhoidectomy. Urinary retention was reported in 30 studies comparing 10 treatments involving 3116 participants. Open haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidopexy had significantly higher odds of urinary retention than rubber band ligation and DG-HAL with mucopexy. Nine studies reported bowel incontinence comparing five treatments involving 1269 participants. Open haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidopexy had the highest probability of bowel incontinence.

CONCLUSION

Open and closed haemorrhoidectomy, and stapled haemorrhoidopexy were associated with worse pain, and more postprocedural bleeding, urinary retention, and bowel incontinence, but had the lowest rates of symptom recurrence. The risks and benefits of each treatment should be discussed with patients before a decision is made.

摘要

背景

目前有多种治疗早期中度症状性痔的方法,每种方法都有其各自的疗效、并发症和风险。本研究旨在比较 II 级-III 级痔的介入治疗的相对临床结果和效果。

方法

根据 PRISMA 标准对 1980 年至 2020 年期间发表的所有 RCT 进行系统评价;使用 MEDLINE、Embase 和 CENTRAL 数据库确定手稿。纳入标准为比较 II 级-III 级痔手术干预的 RCT。主要观察指标为:至少 6 周随访时症状复发、第 1 天视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量的术后疼痛和术后并发症(出血、尿潴留和肠失禁)。在进行偏倚评估和异质性分析后,进行贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。

结果

共确定了 79 项 RCT,包括 9232 名患者。对网络荟萃分析中的 14 种不同治疗方法进行了分析。总体而言,59 项 RCT(73%)被认为存在高度偏倚风险,最大的风险来自结果测量领域。在直接治疗比较中发现了不同程度的异质性,特别是在症状复发和术后疼痛方面。54 项研究报告了痔症状复发,涉及 7026 名患者和 14 种治疗方法。闭合痔切除术的复发风险最低,其次是开放式痔切除术、黏膜结扎加黏膜固定术、吻合器痔上黏膜环切术和多普勒引导痔动脉结扎术加黏膜固定术。34 项研究报告了 3812 名患者和 11 种治疗方法的疼痛。直流电电疗、多普勒引导痔动脉结扎术加黏膜固定术和红外线凝固术的疼痛评分最低。46 项研究记录了 5696 名患者和 14 种治疗方法的术后出血。开放式痔切除术的术后出血风险最大,其次是吻合器痔上黏膜环切术和闭合痔切除术。30 项研究比较了 10 种治疗方法,涉及 3116 名参与者,报告了尿潴留。开放式痔切除术和吻合器痔上黏膜环切术的尿潴留风险明显高于橡胶圈结扎和多普勒引导痔动脉结扎术加黏膜固定术。9 项研究比较了 5 种治疗方法,涉及 1269 名参与者,报告了肠失禁。开放式痔切除术和吻合器痔上黏膜环切术的肠失禁概率最高。

结论

开放式和闭合式痔切除术以及吻合器痔上黏膜环切术与更严重的疼痛、更多的术后出血、尿潴留和肠失禁相关,但症状复发率最低。在做出决定之前,应与患者讨论每种治疗方法的风险和益处。

相似文献

1
Interventional treatments for prolapsing haemorrhoids: network meta-analysis.介入治疗痔脱垂:网状荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2021 Sep 6;5(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab091.
2
Stapled haemorrhoidectomy (haemorrhoidopexy) for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a systematic review and economic evaluation.吻合器痔切除术(痔固定术)治疗痔疮:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Apr;12(8):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-193. doi: 10.3310/hta12080.
3
Rubber band ligation versus haemorrhoidectomy for the treatment of grade II-III haemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.橡皮圈套扎术与痔切除术治疗Ⅱ-Ⅲ度痔疮的疗效比较:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Jun;25(6):663-674. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02430-x. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
7
Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 16;6(6):CD011841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011841.pub3.
8
Treatment for bleeding oesophageal varices in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis.失代偿期肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张出血的治疗:网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 10;4(4):CD013155. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013155.pub2.
9
Rubber band ligation versus excisional haemorrhoidectomy for haemorrhoids.橡皮圈套扎术与外剥内扎术治疗痔疮的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD005034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005034.pub2.
10
Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.老年人髋关节囊外骨折的手术干预:一项网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 10;2(2):CD013405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013405.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Combined therapy of HIFU rectoanal lifting (HIFU-RAL) and sclerotherapy for prolapsed hemorrhoids and rectal mucosal prolapse: A case series.高强度聚焦超声直肠提升术(HIFU-RAL)联合硬化疗法治疗痔脱垂和直肠黏膜脱垂:病例系列
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Sep 5;104(36):e44368. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044368.
2
Postoperative Perianal Abscess and Concomitant Anorectal Fistula: An Extremely Rare Complication After Emergency Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization With Mucopexy for Hemorrhoidal Disease.术后肛周脓肿合并肛瘘:痔病急诊经肛门痔动脉结扎术加黏膜固定术后极为罕见的并发症
Case Rep Surg. 2025 Aug 8;2025:1465838. doi: 10.1155/cris/1465838. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Symptom-based scoring for haemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review.基于症状的痔病评分:系统评价。
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Nov;22(11):1518-1527. doi: 10.1111/codi.15253. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
2
Comparative study of endoscopic band ligation versus injection sclerotherapy with 50% dextrose in water, in symptomatic internal haemorrhoids.内镜下套扎术与50%葡萄糖水注射硬化疗法治疗有症状内痔的对比研究
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2020 Jan-Mar;27(1):13-20. doi: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_128_19.
3
Results of the double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing laser hemorrhoidoplasty with sutured mucopexy and excisional hemorrhoidectomy.
SHAPE-skin-sparing hemorrhoidectomy and PExy: a novel technique for the surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease.
保留皮肤的 SHAPE 痔切除术和固定术:一种治疗痔病的新技术。
Updates Surg. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02255-5.
4
The Complications of Hemorrhoidectomy From Patients' Perspective: A Qualitative Study.从患者角度看痔切除术的并发症:一项定性研究
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 28;8(5):e70724. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70724. eCollection 2025 May.
5
Efficacy and Safety of a New Technique Combining Injection Sclerotherapy and External Hemorrhoidectomy for Prolapsed Hemorrhoids: A Single-center Observational Study.一种结合注射硬化疗法和外痔切除术治疗脱垂性痔新技术的疗效与安全性:一项单中心观察性研究
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2024 Oct 25;8(4):331-339. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2024-034. eCollection 2024.
6
Evaluation of the current guidelines for the management of haemorrhoidal disease using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II instrument.使用《指南研究与评价II》工具对痔病管理现行指南的评估
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Mar 31;11(6):265. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-4255. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
7
Can Targeting Sphincter Spasm Reduce Post-Haemorrhoidectomy Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.靶向肛门括约肌痉挛能否减轻痔术后疼痛?系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2023 Feb;47(2):520-533. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06807-3. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
比较激光痔上黏膜环切术、缝合黏膜固定术和外剥内扎术的双盲随机对照试验结果。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Mar;35(3):481-490. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03460-6. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
4
BUGSnet: an R package to facilitate the conduct and reporting of Bayesian network Meta-analyses.BUGSnet:一个 R 包,用于方便贝叶斯网络荟萃分析的实施和报告。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0829-2.
5
Haemorrhoid energy therapy versus rubber band ligation for the management of grade I and II haemorrhoids: a randomized trial.痔能量疗法与橡皮圈套扎术治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ度痔的随机对照试验
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Nov;89(11):1466-1469. doi: 10.1111/ans.15496. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
6
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
7
European Society of Coloproctology Core Outcome Set for haemorrhoidal disease: an international Delphi study among healthcare professionals.欧洲肛肠病学会痔病核心结局集:一项针对医疗保健专业人员的国际 Delphi 研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2019 May;21(5):570-580. doi: 10.1111/codi.14553. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
8
The Clinical Efficacy of Infrared Photocoagulation Versus Closed Hemorrhoidectomy in Treatment of Hemorrhoid.红外线光凝术与闭合式痔切除术治疗痔疮的临床疗效比较
J Lasers Med Sci. 2018 Winter;9(1):23-26. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2018.06. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
9
Haemorrhoids: an update on management.痔疮:管理方面的最新进展
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2017 Oct;8(10):141-147. doi: 10.1177/2040622317713957. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
10
A prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating the short-term outcomes of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization versus tissue-selecting technique.一项前瞻性随机对照试验,评估经肛门痔动脉结扎术与选择性痔切除术治疗痔的短期疗效。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Sep;21(9):737-743. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1669-x. Epub 2017 Sep 20.